{"title":"学习模式和兴趣对学习结果有什么影响?","authors":"Suratno Suratno, Rahmat Murboyono, Muazza Muazza, Devi Guspita","doi":"10.21831/cp.v42i3.52342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine whether there is a significant influence between the learning model (NHT and STAD) and student interest on learning outcomes . This study uses a mixed methods approach with sequential explanatory. Sequential explanatory is a research where the initial data collection is quantitative which is then followed by qualitative data. The data collection instrument is in the form of a response questionnaire for the STAD and NHT learning models with 18 statements , student interest questionnaires of 1 1 statement, and learning outcomes test sheets containing 7 questions. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by descriptive statistics to find the average value and using inferential statistics in the form of multiple regression test and ANOVA test to see quantitative data, while for qualitative data using Miles Huberman, namely data reduction, data display, and conclusions. This study uses 327 students of SMK 1 and SMK 4 in Jambi City by using a total sampling technique, namely the entire population is used as the research sample . Then interviewed 20 students who were willing to conduct interviews. The results of this study indicate that Student responses to the STAD learning model have a good category, which is 60.2% (197 of 327) and student responses to the NHT learning model of teacher pedagogic competence also have a low category. good that is equal to 58.7% (192 of 225). Student interest in learning also has a good category, which is 60.9% (199 out of 327. And there is a significant influence between learning models, interests and student learning outcomes with the determination coefficient value is (R2) 0.729 . This means the contribution of the model learning and student interest in student learning outcomes by 72.9 %, while the remaining 27.1 % is influenced by other variables.","PeriodicalId":52186,"journal":{"name":"Cakrawala Pendidikan","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the effect of learning models and interests on study results?\",\"authors\":\"Suratno Suratno, Rahmat Murboyono, Muazza Muazza, Devi Guspita\",\"doi\":\"10.21831/cp.v42i3.52342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine whether there is a significant influence between the learning model (NHT and STAD) and student interest on learning outcomes . This study uses a mixed methods approach with sequential explanatory. Sequential explanatory is a research where the initial data collection is quantitative which is then followed by qualitative data. The data collection instrument is in the form of a response questionnaire for the STAD and NHT learning models with 18 statements , student interest questionnaires of 1 1 statement, and learning outcomes test sheets containing 7 questions. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by descriptive statistics to find the average value and using inferential statistics in the form of multiple regression test and ANOVA test to see quantitative data, while for qualitative data using Miles Huberman, namely data reduction, data display, and conclusions. This study uses 327 students of SMK 1 and SMK 4 in Jambi City by using a total sampling technique, namely the entire population is used as the research sample . Then interviewed 20 students who were willing to conduct interviews. The results of this study indicate that Student responses to the STAD learning model have a good category, which is 60.2% (197 of 327) and student responses to the NHT learning model of teacher pedagogic competence also have a low category. good that is equal to 58.7% (192 of 225). Student interest in learning also has a good category, which is 60.9% (199 out of 327. And there is a significant influence between learning models, interests and student learning outcomes with the determination coefficient value is (R2) 0.729 . This means the contribution of the model learning and student interest in student learning outcomes by 72.9 %, while the remaining 27.1 % is influenced by other variables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cakrawala Pendidikan\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cakrawala Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.52342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cakrawala Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v42i3.52342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is the effect of learning models and interests on study results?
This study aims to determine whether there is a significant influence between the learning model (NHT and STAD) and student interest on learning outcomes . This study uses a mixed methods approach with sequential explanatory. Sequential explanatory is a research where the initial data collection is quantitative which is then followed by qualitative data. The data collection instrument is in the form of a response questionnaire for the STAD and NHT learning models with 18 statements , student interest questionnaires of 1 1 statement, and learning outcomes test sheets containing 7 questions. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by descriptive statistics to find the average value and using inferential statistics in the form of multiple regression test and ANOVA test to see quantitative data, while for qualitative data using Miles Huberman, namely data reduction, data display, and conclusions. This study uses 327 students of SMK 1 and SMK 4 in Jambi City by using a total sampling technique, namely the entire population is used as the research sample . Then interviewed 20 students who were willing to conduct interviews. The results of this study indicate that Student responses to the STAD learning model have a good category, which is 60.2% (197 of 327) and student responses to the NHT learning model of teacher pedagogic competence also have a low category. good that is equal to 58.7% (192 of 225). Student interest in learning also has a good category, which is 60.9% (199 out of 327. And there is a significant influence between learning models, interests and student learning outcomes with the determination coefficient value is (R2) 0.729 . This means the contribution of the model learning and student interest in student learning outcomes by 72.9 %, while the remaining 27.1 % is influenced by other variables.