利益平衡中的制裁规模平衡问题(以关税为例)

Mykola Kucheriavenko, Artem Kotenko
{"title":"利益平衡中的制裁规模平衡问题(以关税为例)","authors":"Mykola Kucheriavenko, Artem Kotenko","doi":"10.21564/2414-990x.162.286413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the proposed research, both from theoretical and practical perspectives, lies in addressing the issue of the relationship between the magnitude of sanctions concerning the balance between public and private interests. The main objective of this study is to explore optimal approaches to address issues related to imposing penalties for violations of customs regulations. The results of this research could enhance control procedures and facilitate a balanced determination of penalty sizes in customs law while considering public interest and property rights protection. The study is based on the application of various scientific methods, such as dialectical analysis and synthesis, structural-functional approach, formal-legal and formal-logical analysis, comparative-legal approach, among others. It encompasses an examination of the interplay between public and private interests, as well as an analysis of the system of public interest and potential conflicts arising during the formation of public funds. The research investigates the nature of compulsory payments, such as taxes, fees, and customs duties, illustrated through the example of customs payments. Additionally, it sheds light on issues of administrative liability for customs violations, emphasizing the significance of adhering to specific time criteria when making customs payments and the consequences for the state if these criteria are not met. Furthermore, the study explores the interrelation between material and procedural impact on regulating the behavior of the participants involved in the relationships, emphasizing that these two aspects cannot be separated. It also affirms that the state has the sovereign right to establish taxes, fees, and other payments within its territory to fulfill its functions and meet societal needs. Moreover, the research examines the relationships among various interest groups of participants, such as societal interest, state interest, territorial community interest, government entities, and obligated individuals, while also discerning the division of these interests into disproportionate groups and their interconnectedness. Overall, the research holds significant importance in understanding the issues and prospects within the domain of customs law and administrative responsibility. The findings have the potential to contribute to the improvement of legislation and control procedures, fostering the development of a transparent and efficient legal system capable of safeguarding the interests of all parties involved, including society, the state, and private individuals.","PeriodicalId":417369,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Legality","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem of Balancing the Size of Sanctions in Achieving a Balance of Interests (Using the Example of Customs Duties)\",\"authors\":\"Mykola Kucheriavenko, Artem Kotenko\",\"doi\":\"10.21564/2414-990x.162.286413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the proposed research, both from theoretical and practical perspectives, lies in addressing the issue of the relationship between the magnitude of sanctions concerning the balance between public and private interests. The main objective of this study is to explore optimal approaches to address issues related to imposing penalties for violations of customs regulations. The results of this research could enhance control procedures and facilitate a balanced determination of penalty sizes in customs law while considering public interest and property rights protection. The study is based on the application of various scientific methods, such as dialectical analysis and synthesis, structural-functional approach, formal-legal and formal-logical analysis, comparative-legal approach, among others. It encompasses an examination of the interplay between public and private interests, as well as an analysis of the system of public interest and potential conflicts arising during the formation of public funds. The research investigates the nature of compulsory payments, such as taxes, fees, and customs duties, illustrated through the example of customs payments. Additionally, it sheds light on issues of administrative liability for customs violations, emphasizing the significance of adhering to specific time criteria when making customs payments and the consequences for the state if these criteria are not met. Furthermore, the study explores the interrelation between material and procedural impact on regulating the behavior of the participants involved in the relationships, emphasizing that these two aspects cannot be separated. It also affirms that the state has the sovereign right to establish taxes, fees, and other payments within its territory to fulfill its functions and meet societal needs. Moreover, the research examines the relationships among various interest groups of participants, such as societal interest, state interest, territorial community interest, government entities, and obligated individuals, while also discerning the division of these interests into disproportionate groups and their interconnectedness. Overall, the research holds significant importance in understanding the issues and prospects within the domain of customs law and administrative responsibility. The findings have the potential to contribute to the improvement of legislation and control procedures, fostering the development of a transparent and efficient legal system capable of safeguarding the interests of all parties involved, including society, the state, and private individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Legality\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Legality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.286413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Legality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.162.286413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从理论和实践的角度来看,拟议的研究的相关性在于解决制裁程度与公共利益和私人利益平衡之间的关系问题。本研究的主要目的是探讨解决与对违反海关条例的行为施加处罚有关的问题的最佳方法。这项研究的结果可以加强管制程序,并有助于在考虑公众利益和保护产权的同时,平衡确定海关法中的罚款数额。该研究基于多种科学方法的应用,如辩证分析与综合、结构功能分析、形式法律与形式逻辑分析、比较法律方法等。它包括对公共利益和私人利益之间相互作用的研究,以及对公共利益体系和公共基金形成过程中产生的潜在冲突的分析。该研究调查了强制性支付的性质,如税收、费用和关税,通过海关支付的例子来说明。此外,它还阐明了海关违法行为的行政责任问题,强调了在向海关付款时遵守特定时间标准的重要性,以及如果不符合这些标准,国家将面临的后果。此外,本研究还探讨了物质影响和程序影响在调节关系参与者行为方面的相互关系,强调这两个方面是不可分割的。它还确认,国家拥有在其领土内确定税收、费用和其他支付方式的主权,以履行其职能和满足社会需要。此外,该研究还考察了参与者的各种利益群体之间的关系,如社会利益、国家利益、领土社区利益、政府实体和义务个人,同时也辨别了这些利益群体的划分及其相互联系。总的来说,这项研究对于理解海关法和行政责任领域内的问题和前景具有重要意义。调查结果有可能有助于改善立法和控制程序,促进建立一个透明和有效的法律制度,能够维护包括社会、国家和个人在内的所有有关各方的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Problem of Balancing the Size of Sanctions in Achieving a Balance of Interests (Using the Example of Customs Duties)
The relevance of the proposed research, both from theoretical and practical perspectives, lies in addressing the issue of the relationship between the magnitude of sanctions concerning the balance between public and private interests. The main objective of this study is to explore optimal approaches to address issues related to imposing penalties for violations of customs regulations. The results of this research could enhance control procedures and facilitate a balanced determination of penalty sizes in customs law while considering public interest and property rights protection. The study is based on the application of various scientific methods, such as dialectical analysis and synthesis, structural-functional approach, formal-legal and formal-logical analysis, comparative-legal approach, among others. It encompasses an examination of the interplay between public and private interests, as well as an analysis of the system of public interest and potential conflicts arising during the formation of public funds. The research investigates the nature of compulsory payments, such as taxes, fees, and customs duties, illustrated through the example of customs payments. Additionally, it sheds light on issues of administrative liability for customs violations, emphasizing the significance of adhering to specific time criteria when making customs payments and the consequences for the state if these criteria are not met. Furthermore, the study explores the interrelation between material and procedural impact on regulating the behavior of the participants involved in the relationships, emphasizing that these two aspects cannot be separated. It also affirms that the state has the sovereign right to establish taxes, fees, and other payments within its territory to fulfill its functions and meet societal needs. Moreover, the research examines the relationships among various interest groups of participants, such as societal interest, state interest, territorial community interest, government entities, and obligated individuals, while also discerning the division of these interests into disproportionate groups and their interconnectedness. Overall, the research holds significant importance in understanding the issues and prospects within the domain of customs law and administrative responsibility. The findings have the potential to contribute to the improvement of legislation and control procedures, fostering the development of a transparent and efficient legal system capable of safeguarding the interests of all parties involved, including society, the state, and private individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信