在太阳物理学中招聘和保留的重要性:这不仅仅是一个管道问题

IF 2.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Alexa J. Halford, Christopher M. Bard, Angeline G. Burrell, Ryan M. McGranaghan, Lynn B. Wilson III, McArthur Jones, Chuanfei Dong, Liang Wang, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Niescja Turner, Michael W. Liemohn, Jeff Klenzing
{"title":"在太阳物理学中招聘和保留的重要性:这不仅仅是一个管道问题","authors":"Alexa J. Halford, Christopher M. Bard, Angeline G. Burrell, Ryan M. McGranaghan, Lynn B. Wilson III, McArthur Jones, Chuanfei Dong, Liang Wang, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Niescja Turner, Michael W. Liemohn, Jeff Klenzing","doi":"10.3389/fspas.2023.1216449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A major obstacle in cultivating a robust Heliophysics (and broader scientific) community is the lack of diversity throughout science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. For many years, this has been understood as a “leaky pipeline” analogy, in which predominately minority students initially interested in STEM gradually fall (or are pushed) out of the field on their way to a scientific research position. However, this ignores critical structural and policy issues which drive even later career Ph.D.s out of a career in Heliophysics. We identify here several systemic problems that inhibit many from participating fully in the Heliophysics community, including soft money pressure, lack of accessibility and equity, power imbalances, lack of accountability, friction in collaboration, and difficulties in forming mentorship bonds. We present several recommendations to empower research-supporting organizations to help create a culture of inclusion, openness, and innovative science.","PeriodicalId":46793,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of recruitment and retention in Heliophysics: it’s not just a pipeline problem\",\"authors\":\"Alexa J. Halford, Christopher M. Bard, Angeline G. Burrell, Ryan M. McGranaghan, Lynn B. Wilson III, McArthur Jones, Chuanfei Dong, Liang Wang, Tuija I. Pulkkinen, Niescja Turner, Michael W. Liemohn, Jeff Klenzing\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fspas.2023.1216449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A major obstacle in cultivating a robust Heliophysics (and broader scientific) community is the lack of diversity throughout science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. For many years, this has been understood as a “leaky pipeline” analogy, in which predominately minority students initially interested in STEM gradually fall (or are pushed) out of the field on their way to a scientific research position. However, this ignores critical structural and policy issues which drive even later career Ph.D.s out of a career in Heliophysics. We identify here several systemic problems that inhibit many from participating fully in the Heliophysics community, including soft money pressure, lack of accessibility and equity, power imbalances, lack of accountability, friction in collaboration, and difficulties in forming mentorship bonds. We present several recommendations to empower research-supporting organizations to help create a culture of inclusion, openness, and innovative science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1216449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1216449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

培养一个强大的太阳物理学(以及更广泛的科学)社区的一个主要障碍是在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域缺乏多样性。多年来,这一直被理解为“管道泄漏”的类比,即最初对STEM感兴趣的主要少数民族学生在通往科研岗位的道路上逐渐退出(或被挤出)该领域。然而,这忽略了关键的结构和政策问题,这些问题甚至导致后来的职业博士们离开了太阳物理学的职业生涯。我们在这里指出了几个系统性问题,这些问题阻碍了许多人充分参与太阳物理学社区,包括软资金压力、缺乏可及性和公平性、权力不平衡、缺乏问责制、合作摩擦以及形成师友关系的困难。我们提出了一些建议,以授权研究支持组织帮助创建一种包容、开放和创新的科学文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The importance of recruitment and retention in Heliophysics: it’s not just a pipeline problem
A major obstacle in cultivating a robust Heliophysics (and broader scientific) community is the lack of diversity throughout science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. For many years, this has been understood as a “leaky pipeline” analogy, in which predominately minority students initially interested in STEM gradually fall (or are pushed) out of the field on their way to a scientific research position. However, this ignores critical structural and policy issues which drive even later career Ph.D.s out of a career in Heliophysics. We identify here several systemic problems that inhibit many from participating fully in the Heliophysics community, including soft money pressure, lack of accessibility and equity, power imbalances, lack of accountability, friction in collaboration, and difficulties in forming mentorship bonds. We present several recommendations to empower research-supporting organizations to help create a culture of inclusion, openness, and innovative science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
363
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信