在工程和建筑行业实施ISO14001:系统回顾

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
R E Horry, C A Booth, A-M Mahamadu, S Ball
{"title":"在工程和建筑行业实施ISO14001:系统回顾","authors":"R E Horry, C A Booth, A-M Mahamadu, S Ball","doi":"10.1680/jensu.23.00038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a need within society to manage our impacts on the environment. The ISO14001 tool, based on the original BS7750 standard, was created in 1996 and subsequently updated in 2004 and 2015, has become the most prevalent type of Environmental Management Systems (EMS) adopted worldwide. Engineering and construction organisations wanting to implement ISO14001 should be fully acquainted with the advantages and disadvantages of adopting an EMS. Using the SCOPUS academic database, this study uses the PRISMA-method to identify and select publications (since 1999) for systematic review. Examination of the chosen articles (n=46) reveals a limited number of works per annum, with a peak in 2011 (n=6). The most frequently reported benefits are ‘enriching green corporate and public image’, ‘improved environmental performance’ and ‘regulation compliance’; whilst the barriers are ‘costs’, ‘lack of experience, expertise or knowledge’ and ‘lack of training’. Further analysis, using VOSviewer, has shown the network relationships between article keywords, notably that sustainability is increasingly listed (since 2011) and links with most other keywords. This suggests the engineering and construction sectors may be seeing beyond the cost barrier and are realising the positive difference ISO14001 can contribute to their operations, their local/national communities, and to the SDGs.","PeriodicalId":49671,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing ISO14001 in the engineering and construction sectors: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"R E Horry, C A Booth, A-M Mahamadu, S Ball\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jensu.23.00038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is a need within society to manage our impacts on the environment. The ISO14001 tool, based on the original BS7750 standard, was created in 1996 and subsequently updated in 2004 and 2015, has become the most prevalent type of Environmental Management Systems (EMS) adopted worldwide. Engineering and construction organisations wanting to implement ISO14001 should be fully acquainted with the advantages and disadvantages of adopting an EMS. Using the SCOPUS academic database, this study uses the PRISMA-method to identify and select publications (since 1999) for systematic review. Examination of the chosen articles (n=46) reveals a limited number of works per annum, with a peak in 2011 (n=6). The most frequently reported benefits are ‘enriching green corporate and public image’, ‘improved environmental performance’ and ‘regulation compliance’; whilst the barriers are ‘costs’, ‘lack of experience, expertise or knowledge’ and ‘lack of training’. Further analysis, using VOSviewer, has shown the network relationships between article keywords, notably that sustainability is increasingly listed (since 2011) and links with most other keywords. This suggests the engineering and construction sectors may be seeing beyond the cost barrier and are realising the positive difference ISO14001 can contribute to their operations, their local/national communities, and to the SDGs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.23.00038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.23.00038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会需要管理我们对环境的影响。ISO14001工具基于最初的BS7750标准,于1996年创建,随后于2004年和2015年更新,已成为全球采用的最普遍的环境管理体系(EMS)类型。希望实施ISO14001的工程和建筑组织应该充分了解采用环境管理体系的优点和缺点。本研究使用SCOPUS学术数据库,采用prisma方法识别和选择出版物(1999年以来)进行系统评价。对所选文章(n=46)的检查显示,每年的作品数量有限,2011年达到峰值(n=6)。最常报道的好处是“丰富绿色企业和公众形象”、“改善环保表现”和“遵守法规”;而障碍是“成本”、“缺乏经验、专业知识或知识”和“缺乏培训”。进一步的分析,使用VOSviewer,显示了文章关键词之间的网络关系,特别是可持续性越来越多地被列出(自2011年以来)和大多数其他关键词的链接。这表明工程和建筑部门可能会超越成本障碍,并正在意识到ISO14001可以为他们的运营、当地/国家社区以及可持续发展目标做出的积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing ISO14001 in the engineering and construction sectors: a systematic review
There is a need within society to manage our impacts on the environment. The ISO14001 tool, based on the original BS7750 standard, was created in 1996 and subsequently updated in 2004 and 2015, has become the most prevalent type of Environmental Management Systems (EMS) adopted worldwide. Engineering and construction organisations wanting to implement ISO14001 should be fully acquainted with the advantages and disadvantages of adopting an EMS. Using the SCOPUS academic database, this study uses the PRISMA-method to identify and select publications (since 1999) for systematic review. Examination of the chosen articles (n=46) reveals a limited number of works per annum, with a peak in 2011 (n=6). The most frequently reported benefits are ‘enriching green corporate and public image’, ‘improved environmental performance’ and ‘regulation compliance’; whilst the barriers are ‘costs’, ‘lack of experience, expertise or knowledge’ and ‘lack of training’. Further analysis, using VOSviewer, has shown the network relationships between article keywords, notably that sustainability is increasingly listed (since 2011) and links with most other keywords. This suggests the engineering and construction sectors may be seeing beyond the cost barrier and are realising the positive difference ISO14001 can contribute to their operations, their local/national communities, and to the SDGs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Engineering Sustainability provides a forum for sharing the latest thinking from research and practice, and increasingly is presenting the ''how to'' of engineering a resilient future. The journal features refereed papers and shorter articles relating to the pursuit and implementation of sustainability principles through engineering planning, design and application. The tensions between and integration of social, economic and environmental considerations within such schemes are of particular relevance. Methodologies for assessing sustainability, policy issues, education and corporate responsibility will also be included. The aims will be met primarily by providing papers and briefing notes (including case histories and best practice guidance) of use to decision-makers, practitioners, researchers and students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信