生长期患者上颌宽度测定方法的比较评价

A. Sh. Gazimagomedova, M. A. Vardanyan, N. S. Drobysheva
{"title":"生长期患者上颌宽度测定方法的比较评价","authors":"A. Sh. Gazimagomedova, M. A. Vardanyan, N. S. Drobysheva","doi":"10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-3-231-237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To conduct a comparative evaluation of methods for measuring the width of the upper jaw in growing patients in order to determine the difference between these standard values and improve diagnostics. Materials and methods. The study was conducted in 20 patients aged 6, 8, 10 and 12 years. Measurement of the transversal dimensions of the jaws was carried out on frontal cephalograms using the Ricketts cephalometric analysis, and on CBCT scans using the analysis of the University of Pennsylvania. Results. The results of measurements by frontal cephalograms and CBCT scans have almost the same indicators, the data of both methods differ insignificantly. Conclusions. As a result of the study, both methods confirmed their reliability, however, the analysis of cone-beam computed tomography has a number of advantages. Accordingly, it is possible to simplify the carrying out of diagnostic measures to determine the width of the upper jaw, limiting ourselves to one research method – cone-beam computed tomography without prescribing additional teleroentgenography.","PeriodicalId":34648,"journal":{"name":"Endodontiia Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of methods fordetermining the width of the upper jaw in growing patients\",\"authors\":\"A. Sh. Gazimagomedova, M. A. Vardanyan, N. S. Drobysheva\",\"doi\":\"10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-3-231-237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. To conduct a comparative evaluation of methods for measuring the width of the upper jaw in growing patients in order to determine the difference between these standard values and improve diagnostics. Materials and methods. The study was conducted in 20 patients aged 6, 8, 10 and 12 years. Measurement of the transversal dimensions of the jaws was carried out on frontal cephalograms using the Ricketts cephalometric analysis, and on CBCT scans using the analysis of the University of Pennsylvania. Results. The results of measurements by frontal cephalograms and CBCT scans have almost the same indicators, the data of both methods differ insignificantly. Conclusions. As a result of the study, both methods confirmed their reliability, however, the analysis of cone-beam computed tomography has a number of advantages. Accordingly, it is possible to simplify the carrying out of diagnostic measures to determine the width of the upper jaw, limiting ourselves to one research method – cone-beam computed tomography without prescribing additional teleroentgenography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endodontiia Today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endodontiia Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-3-231-237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontiia Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-3-231-237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的目标。对生长期患者上颌宽度测量方法进行比较评价,以确定这些标准值之间的差异,提高诊断水平。材料和方法。该研究对20名年龄分别为6岁、8岁、10岁和12岁的患者进行了研究。下颌横向尺寸的测量是在使用Ricketts头侧测量分析的额部头颅造影上进行的,以及使用宾夕法尼亚大学分析的CBCT扫描上进行的。结果。额位头颅造影与CBCT的测量结果指标基本一致,两种方法的数据差异不显著。结论。作为研究的结果,两种方法都证实了它们的可靠性,然而,锥束计算机断层扫描的分析有许多优点。因此,有可能简化诊断措施的实施,以确定上颌的宽度,将我们自己限制在一种研究方法-锥束计算机断层扫描,而无需规定额外的远程心动图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of methods fordetermining the width of the upper jaw in growing patients
Aim. To conduct a comparative evaluation of methods for measuring the width of the upper jaw in growing patients in order to determine the difference between these standard values and improve diagnostics. Materials and methods. The study was conducted in 20 patients aged 6, 8, 10 and 12 years. Measurement of the transversal dimensions of the jaws was carried out on frontal cephalograms using the Ricketts cephalometric analysis, and on CBCT scans using the analysis of the University of Pennsylvania. Results. The results of measurements by frontal cephalograms and CBCT scans have almost the same indicators, the data of both methods differ insignificantly. Conclusions. As a result of the study, both methods confirmed their reliability, however, the analysis of cone-beam computed tomography has a number of advantages. Accordingly, it is possible to simplify the carrying out of diagnostic measures to determine the width of the upper jaw, limiting ourselves to one research method – cone-beam computed tomography without prescribing additional teleroentgenography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信