回应:“从来都不是最强的:在关于质量的辩论中协调系统动力学的四个思想流派”-通过共享工具和技术加强该领域

IF 1.7 3区管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT

System Dynamics Review Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1002/sdr.1751

Robert Eberlein

{"title":"回应:“从来都不是最强的:在关于质量的辩论中协调系统动力学的四个思想流派”-通过共享工具和技术加强该领域","authors":"Robert Eberlein","doi":"10.1002/sdr.1751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System Dynamics ReviewEarly View Letter to the Editor In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751 Accepted by Andreas Größler Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References Eberlein R, Chichakly K, Größler A, King-Beall A, Moyano IM, Armenia S 2017. “Recommendations for the Conference Submission and Review Process” a Report to the System Dynamics Society Policy Council. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/PolicyCouncil/2017/summer/papers/P1019.pdf. Forrester JW. 2007. System dynamics—The next fifty years. System Dynamics Review 23(2–3): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.381. Peterson DW, Eberlein R. 1994. Reality check: A bridge between systems thinking and system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100205. Richardson G. 2017. Confidence in Exploratory Models. In System Dynamics Society Winter Camp: Albuquerque, NM. Richardson G 2023. “Building Confidence in Exploratory Models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 System Dynamics Conference. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2023/papers/P1002.pdf. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":51500,"journal":{"name":"System Dynamics Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques\",\"authors\":\"Robert Eberlein\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sdr.1751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"System Dynamics ReviewEarly View Letter to the Editor In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751 Accepted by Andreas Größler Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References Eberlein R, Chichakly K, Größler A, King-Beall A, Moyano IM, Armenia S 2017. “Recommendations for the Conference Submission and Review Process” a Report to the System Dynamics Society Policy Council. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/PolicyCouncil/2017/summer/papers/P1019.pdf. Forrester JW. 2007. System dynamics—The next fifty years. System Dynamics Review 23(2–3): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.381. Peterson DW, Eberlein R. 1994. Reality check: A bridge between systems thinking and system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100205. Richardson G. 2017. Confidence in Exploratory Models. In System Dynamics Society Winter Camp: Albuquerque, NM. Richardson G 2023. “Building Confidence in Exploratory Models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 System Dynamics Conference. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2023/papers/P1002.pdf. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation\",\"PeriodicalId\":51500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"System Dynamics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System Dynamics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

系统动力学评论早期观点致编辑的信回应:“永远不是最强的:在质量辩论中协调系统动力学的四种思想流派”-通过共享工具和技术加强该领域罗伯特·埃伯莱因，通讯作者罗伯特·埃伯莱因[email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems，黎巴嫩，新罕布什尔州，美国。通讯:罗伯特·埃伯莱因，isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A，黎巴嫩，NH 03766，美国。E-mail: [email protected]搜索本文作者Robert Eberlein的更多论文，通讯作者Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA。通讯地址:Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA。E-mail: [email protected]搜索该作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年10月24日https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751被Andreas接受Größler阅读全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件，并在下面的复选框中选择分享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件，请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。复制URL共享链接共享一个emailfacebooktwitterlinkedinreddit微信本文无摘要参考文献Eberlein R, Chichakly K, Größler A, King-Beall A, Moyano IM，亚美尼亚S 2017。“会议提交和审查过程的建议”，提交给系统动力学学会政策委员会的报告。https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/PolicyCouncil/2017/summer/papers/P1019.pdf。Forrester JW。2007. 系统动力学——未来50年。系统动力学评论23(2-3):359-370。https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.381。李建军，李建军。1994。现实检查:系统思考和系统动力学之间的桥梁。系统动力学评论10(2-3):159-174。https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100205。Richardson G. 2017。探索性模型的信心。在系统动力学学会冬令营:阿尔伯克基，新墨西哥州。理查森G 2023。“在探索性模型中建立信心”，载于2023年系统动力学会议论文集。https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2023/papers/P1002.pdf。在问题包含之前的早期视图在线版本的记录参考信息

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques

System Dynamics ReviewEarly View Letter to the Editor In response to: “Never the strongest: reconciling the four schools of thought in system dynamics in the debate on quality” —Strengthening the field through shared tools and techniques Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Robert Eberlein, Corresponding Author Robert Eberlein [email protected] orcid.org/0009-0001-8444-3030 isee systems, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA Correspondence to: Robert Eberlein, isee systems, 24 Hanover Street Suite 8A, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1751 Accepted by Andreas Größler Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References Eberlein R, Chichakly K, Größler A, King-Beall A, Moyano IM, Armenia S 2017. “Recommendations for the Conference Submission and Review Process” a Report to the System Dynamics Society Policy Council. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/PolicyCouncil/2017/summer/papers/P1019.pdf. Forrester JW. 2007. System dynamics—The next fifty years. System Dynamics Review 23(2–3): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.381. Peterson DW, Eberlein R. 1994. Reality check: A bridge between systems thinking and system dynamics. System Dynamics Review 10(2–3): 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.4260100205. Richardson G. 2017. Confidence in Exploratory Models. In System Dynamics Society Winter Camp: Albuquerque, NM. Richardson G 2023. “Building Confidence in Exploratory Models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 System Dynamics Conference. https://proceedings.systemdynamics.org/2023/papers/P1002.pdf. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

System Dynamics Review Multiple-

CiteScore

6.60

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The System Dynamics Review exists to communicate to a wide audience advances in the application of the perspectives and methods of system dynamics to societal, technical, managerial, and environmental problems. The Review publishes: advances in mathematical modelling and computer simulation of dynamic feedback systems; advances in methods of policy analysis based on information feedback and circular causality; generic structures (dynamic feedback systems that support particular widely applicable behavioural insights); system dynamics contributions to theory building in the social and natural sciences; policy studies and debate emphasizing the role of feedback and circular causality in problem behaviour.