Rohith Vulchi, Scott Nolte, Joshua McGinty, Benjamin McKnight
{"title":"除草剂计划、种植顺序和耕作类型:抗麦草畏棉花中紫红草的系统管理方法","authors":"Rohith Vulchi, Scott Nolte, Joshua McGinty, Benjamin McKnight","doi":"10.3389/fagro.2023.1277054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Herbicide-resistant Amaranthus palmeri poses a significant threat to cotton production in the US. Tillage, cover crops, crop rotations, and dicamba-based herbicide programs can individually provide effective control of A. palmeri , but there is a lack of research evaluating the above tactics in a system for its long-term management. Field trials were conducted near College Station and Thrall, TX (2019–2021) to evaluate the efficacy of dicamba-based herbicide programs under multiple cropping sequences and tillage types in a systems approach for A. palmeri control in dicamba-resistant cotton. The experimental design used was a split–split plot design. The main plots were no-till cover cropping, strip tillage, and conventional tillage. The subplots were cotton:cotton:cotton (CCC) and cotton:sorghum:cotton (CSC) sequences for 3 years within each tillage type, and sub-subplots were a weedy check (WC), a weed-free check (WF), a low-input program without residual herbicides (LI), and a high-input program with residual herbicides (HI). Using HI under the CSC sequence was the only system that provided >90% control of A. palmeri for 3 years across all tillage types and locations. By 2021, A. palmeri densities in the CSC sequence at College Station (4,156 plants ha −1 ) and Thrall (4,006 plants ha −1 ) are significantly low compared to the CCC sequence (31,364 and 9,867 plants ha −1 , respectively) when averaged across other factors. Similarly, A. palmeri densities in HI at College Station (9,867 plants ha −1 ) and Thrall (1,016 plants ha −1 ) are significantly low compared to LI (25,653 and 13,365 plants ha −1 , respectively) when averaged across other factors. We also observed that the CSC sequence reduced A. palmeri seed bank by at least 40% compared to the CCC sequence at both College Station and Thrall when averaged across other factors. Over 3 years, we did not observe significant differences between LI and HI for cotton yields at College Station (1,715–3,636 kg ha −1 ) and Thrall (1,569−1,989 kg ha −1 ). However, rotating cotton with sorghum during 2020 improved cotton yields by 39% under no-till cover cropping in 2021 at Thrall. These results indicate that using dicamba-based herbicide programs with residual herbicides and implementing crop rotations can effectively manage A. palmeri in terms of seasonal control, densities, and seed bank buildup across tillage types and environments.","PeriodicalId":34038,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbicide programs, cropping sequences, and tillage-types: a systems approach for managing Amaranthus palmeri in dicamba-resistant cotton\",\"authors\":\"Rohith Vulchi, Scott Nolte, Joshua McGinty, Benjamin McKnight\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fagro.2023.1277054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Herbicide-resistant Amaranthus palmeri poses a significant threat to cotton production in the US. Tillage, cover crops, crop rotations, and dicamba-based herbicide programs can individually provide effective control of A. palmeri , but there is a lack of research evaluating the above tactics in a system for its long-term management. Field trials were conducted near College Station and Thrall, TX (2019–2021) to evaluate the efficacy of dicamba-based herbicide programs under multiple cropping sequences and tillage types in a systems approach for A. palmeri control in dicamba-resistant cotton. The experimental design used was a split–split plot design. The main plots were no-till cover cropping, strip tillage, and conventional tillage. The subplots were cotton:cotton:cotton (CCC) and cotton:sorghum:cotton (CSC) sequences for 3 years within each tillage type, and sub-subplots were a weedy check (WC), a weed-free check (WF), a low-input program without residual herbicides (LI), and a high-input program with residual herbicides (HI). Using HI under the CSC sequence was the only system that provided >90% control of A. palmeri for 3 years across all tillage types and locations. By 2021, A. palmeri densities in the CSC sequence at College Station (4,156 plants ha −1 ) and Thrall (4,006 plants ha −1 ) are significantly low compared to the CCC sequence (31,364 and 9,867 plants ha −1 , respectively) when averaged across other factors. Similarly, A. palmeri densities in HI at College Station (9,867 plants ha −1 ) and Thrall (1,016 plants ha −1 ) are significantly low compared to LI (25,653 and 13,365 plants ha −1 , respectively) when averaged across other factors. We also observed that the CSC sequence reduced A. palmeri seed bank by at least 40% compared to the CCC sequence at both College Station and Thrall when averaged across other factors. Over 3 years, we did not observe significant differences between LI and HI for cotton yields at College Station (1,715–3,636 kg ha −1 ) and Thrall (1,569−1,989 kg ha −1 ). However, rotating cotton with sorghum during 2020 improved cotton yields by 39% under no-till cover cropping in 2021 at Thrall. These results indicate that using dicamba-based herbicide programs with residual herbicides and implementing crop rotations can effectively manage A. palmeri in terms of seasonal control, densities, and seed bank buildup across tillage types and environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Agronomy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1277054\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1277054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
抗除草剂苋菜对美国棉花生产构成了重大威胁。耕作、覆盖作物、轮作和麦草畏除草剂方案均能有效地防治棕榈蚜,但缺乏在一个系统中对上述策略进行长期管理的研究。2019-2021年,在德克萨斯州大学城(College Station)和萨尔(Thrall)附近进行了田间试验,以评估基于麦草畏的除草剂方案在多重种植顺序和耕作类型下对抗麦草畏棉花的草蚜控制效果。实验设计采用裂-裂小区设计。主要耕作方式为免耕覆盖、带状耕作和常规耕作。每个耕作类型的子样为3年的棉花:棉花:棉花(CCC)和棉花:高粱:棉花(CSC)序列,子样为杂草检查(WC)、无杂草检查(WF)、无残留除草剂的低投入方案(LI)和残留除草剂的高投入方案(HI)。在CSC序列下使用HI是唯一能在所有耕作类型和地点连续3年控制棕榈蚜90%的系统。到2021年,与CCC序列(分别为31,364株和9,867株ha - 1)相比,College Station和Thrall的CSC序列(4,156株ha - 1)的palmeri密度显著降低。同样,在其他因素的平均影响下,College Station和Thrall地区高海拔地区palmeri的密度分别为9,867株ha - 1和1,016株ha - 1,显著低于LI地区(分别为25,653和13,365株ha - 1)。我们还观察到,当在其他因素上平均时,CSC序列比CCC序列在College Station和Thrall都减少了至少40%的A. palmeri种子库。在3年的时间里,我们观察到LI和HI在大学城(1,715-3,636 kg ha - 1)和萨尔(1,569 - 1,989 kg ha - 1)的棉花产量上没有显著差异。然而,在萨尔,2020年棉花与高粱轮作将使2021年免耕覆盖种植下的棉花产量提高39%。这些结果表明,在不同耕作类型和不同环境下,使用麦草畏除草剂和残留除草剂并实行轮作可以有效地控制棕榈草的季节控制、密度和种子库积累。
Herbicide programs, cropping sequences, and tillage-types: a systems approach for managing Amaranthus palmeri in dicamba-resistant cotton
Herbicide-resistant Amaranthus palmeri poses a significant threat to cotton production in the US. Tillage, cover crops, crop rotations, and dicamba-based herbicide programs can individually provide effective control of A. palmeri , but there is a lack of research evaluating the above tactics in a system for its long-term management. Field trials were conducted near College Station and Thrall, TX (2019–2021) to evaluate the efficacy of dicamba-based herbicide programs under multiple cropping sequences and tillage types in a systems approach for A. palmeri control in dicamba-resistant cotton. The experimental design used was a split–split plot design. The main plots were no-till cover cropping, strip tillage, and conventional tillage. The subplots were cotton:cotton:cotton (CCC) and cotton:sorghum:cotton (CSC) sequences for 3 years within each tillage type, and sub-subplots were a weedy check (WC), a weed-free check (WF), a low-input program without residual herbicides (LI), and a high-input program with residual herbicides (HI). Using HI under the CSC sequence was the only system that provided >90% control of A. palmeri for 3 years across all tillage types and locations. By 2021, A. palmeri densities in the CSC sequence at College Station (4,156 plants ha −1 ) and Thrall (4,006 plants ha −1 ) are significantly low compared to the CCC sequence (31,364 and 9,867 plants ha −1 , respectively) when averaged across other factors. Similarly, A. palmeri densities in HI at College Station (9,867 plants ha −1 ) and Thrall (1,016 plants ha −1 ) are significantly low compared to LI (25,653 and 13,365 plants ha −1 , respectively) when averaged across other factors. We also observed that the CSC sequence reduced A. palmeri seed bank by at least 40% compared to the CCC sequence at both College Station and Thrall when averaged across other factors. Over 3 years, we did not observe significant differences between LI and HI for cotton yields at College Station (1,715–3,636 kg ha −1 ) and Thrall (1,569−1,989 kg ha −1 ). However, rotating cotton with sorghum during 2020 improved cotton yields by 39% under no-till cover cropping in 2021 at Thrall. These results indicate that using dicamba-based herbicide programs with residual herbicides and implementing crop rotations can effectively manage A. palmeri in terms of seasonal control, densities, and seed bank buildup across tillage types and environments.