对基于奖励的众筹绩效和成功中未解决的研究差距的检查

Muma Business Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.28945/5210
matthew grace
{"title":"对基于奖励的众筹绩效和成功中未解决的研究差距的检查","authors":"matthew grace","doi":"10.28945/5210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrepreneurs’ options for raising capital in the 21st Century have changed dramatically. Of the new options for individuals and businesses to raise funds, none has received more attention in the last decade than Crowdfunding. Crowdfunding, having emerged from crowdsourcing, allows fundraisers to collect funds from funders, usually via the internet, and most often through an intermediary, the crowdfunding platform. The most studied type of crowdfunding is reward-based crowdfunding in which funders receive a reward from the funder for pledging funds to a campaign. What factors impact the performance of reward-based crowdfunding campaigns is of vital importance. Similarly, knowledge of the recent advances in the field including the remaining research gaps, which have so far been underexplored, is also pressing. The purpose of this systematic review was therefore to answer two interrelated, questions: first, what performance and success factors have been recently discovered in the RBCF literature (2018-2021)? Second, what are the remaining unaddressed research gaps in reward-based crowdfunding performance and success? This review produced several key findings. In addition to the many gaps already identified in previous crowdfunding reviews, this review identified several novel gaps. First, the extant literature has not addressed the importance of macroeconomic factors in determining the performance of campaigns. Second, there is a paucity of research concerning the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on campaign performance, or how funder motivations and behaviors have been affected. Third, there has been a lack of research on fundraisers whose campaigns are “self-hosted” on their own websites bypassing crowdfunding platforms altogether. Lastly, this review did not identify any studies that attempted to understand the effects of funders canceling or decreasing previously made pledges to a campaign, or what motivates funders to change their pledges mid-campaign.","PeriodicalId":234535,"journal":{"name":"Muma Business Review","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Examination of Unaddressed Research Gaps in Reward-Based Crowdfunding Performance and Success\",\"authors\":\"matthew grace\",\"doi\":\"10.28945/5210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Entrepreneurs’ options for raising capital in the 21st Century have changed dramatically. Of the new options for individuals and businesses to raise funds, none has received more attention in the last decade than Crowdfunding. Crowdfunding, having emerged from crowdsourcing, allows fundraisers to collect funds from funders, usually via the internet, and most often through an intermediary, the crowdfunding platform. The most studied type of crowdfunding is reward-based crowdfunding in which funders receive a reward from the funder for pledging funds to a campaign. What factors impact the performance of reward-based crowdfunding campaigns is of vital importance. Similarly, knowledge of the recent advances in the field including the remaining research gaps, which have so far been underexplored, is also pressing. The purpose of this systematic review was therefore to answer two interrelated, questions: first, what performance and success factors have been recently discovered in the RBCF literature (2018-2021)? Second, what are the remaining unaddressed research gaps in reward-based crowdfunding performance and success? This review produced several key findings. In addition to the many gaps already identified in previous crowdfunding reviews, this review identified several novel gaps. First, the extant literature has not addressed the importance of macroeconomic factors in determining the performance of campaigns. Second, there is a paucity of research concerning the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on campaign performance, or how funder motivations and behaviors have been affected. Third, there has been a lack of research on fundraisers whose campaigns are “self-hosted” on their own websites bypassing crowdfunding platforms altogether. Lastly, this review did not identify any studies that attempted to understand the effects of funders canceling or decreasing previously made pledges to a campaign, or what motivates funders to change their pledges mid-campaign.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muma Business Review\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muma Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28945/5210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muma Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/5210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在21世纪,企业家的融资选择发生了巨大变化。在个人和企业筹集资金的新选择中,没有什么比众筹在过去十年中受到了更多的关注。众筹是由众包发展而来的,它允许筹款者从出资者那里筹集资金,通常是通过互联网,最常见的是通过一个中介,即众筹平台。研究最多的众筹类型是基于奖励的众筹,在这种众筹中,出资者从出资者那里获得奖励,为一项活动提供资金。什么因素会影响基于奖励的众筹活动的表现是至关重要的。同样,了解该领域的最新进展,包括迄今尚未充分探索的剩余研究空白,也很紧迫。因此,本系统综述的目的是回答两个相互关联的问题:首先,最近在RBCF文献(2018-2021)中发现了哪些绩效和成功因素?其次,在基于奖励的众筹绩效和成功方面,还有哪些未解决的研究差距?这次审查产生了几个关键发现。除了在之前的众筹审查中已经发现的许多差距之外,这次审查还发现了一些新的差距。首先,现有文献没有论述宏观经济因素在决定竞选业绩方面的重要性。其次,关于COVID-19大流行对活动绩效的影响,或如何影响资助者的动机和行为的研究缺乏。第三,缺乏对绕过众筹平台,在自己的网站上“自行托管”活动的筹款人的研究。最后,本综述没有发现任何试图了解资助者取消或减少先前对活动的承诺的影响,或者资助者在活动中改变承诺的动机的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Examination of Unaddressed Research Gaps in Reward-Based Crowdfunding Performance and Success
Entrepreneurs’ options for raising capital in the 21st Century have changed dramatically. Of the new options for individuals and businesses to raise funds, none has received more attention in the last decade than Crowdfunding. Crowdfunding, having emerged from crowdsourcing, allows fundraisers to collect funds from funders, usually via the internet, and most often through an intermediary, the crowdfunding platform. The most studied type of crowdfunding is reward-based crowdfunding in which funders receive a reward from the funder for pledging funds to a campaign. What factors impact the performance of reward-based crowdfunding campaigns is of vital importance. Similarly, knowledge of the recent advances in the field including the remaining research gaps, which have so far been underexplored, is also pressing. The purpose of this systematic review was therefore to answer two interrelated, questions: first, what performance and success factors have been recently discovered in the RBCF literature (2018-2021)? Second, what are the remaining unaddressed research gaps in reward-based crowdfunding performance and success? This review produced several key findings. In addition to the many gaps already identified in previous crowdfunding reviews, this review identified several novel gaps. First, the extant literature has not addressed the importance of macroeconomic factors in determining the performance of campaigns. Second, there is a paucity of research concerning the impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on campaign performance, or how funder motivations and behaviors have been affected. Third, there has been a lack of research on fundraisers whose campaigns are “self-hosted” on their own websites bypassing crowdfunding platforms altogether. Lastly, this review did not identify any studies that attempted to understand the effects of funders canceling or decreasing previously made pledges to a campaign, or what motivates funders to change their pledges mid-campaign.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信