产品开发:想象与实践

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
László Berényi, László Soltész
{"title":"产品开发:想象与实践","authors":"László Berényi, László Soltész","doi":"10.12700/aph.20.9.2023.9.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The increasingly agile environment requires quick responses, including technological solutions and project management decisions. Former investigations aimed to explore expert opinions about project success factors. This study enhances the investigations to student opinions for establishing a more comprehensive view of the critical issues. A harmonious collaboration based on agreed values and methods has been appreciated. The study used a survey among engineering and business students (n=155) about the success factors of product development projects. The goal was to explore their opinions and compare those with expert opinions. The results show that clear goals are considered very important by both groups. Project meetings, cooperation, and other soft factors are recognized as more important by the experts than by the students. The results confirm that the order of the opinions is significantly different. The cluster analysis marked three distinctive patterns of opinions. Improving the performance of the mixed project teams reflected in project success calls for action. Accepting the more professional approach the experienced project team members, the lack of students’ competencies can be designated. Changes must be supported by training activities and rethinking the curricula in the field.","PeriodicalId":50884,"journal":{"name":"Acta Polytechnica Hungarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Product Development: Imagines versus Practice\",\"authors\":\"László Berényi, László Soltész\",\"doi\":\"10.12700/aph.20.9.2023.9.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The increasingly agile environment requires quick responses, including technological solutions and project management decisions. Former investigations aimed to explore expert opinions about project success factors. This study enhances the investigations to student opinions for establishing a more comprehensive view of the critical issues. A harmonious collaboration based on agreed values and methods has been appreciated. The study used a survey among engineering and business students (n=155) about the success factors of product development projects. The goal was to explore their opinions and compare those with expert opinions. The results show that clear goals are considered very important by both groups. Project meetings, cooperation, and other soft factors are recognized as more important by the experts than by the students. The results confirm that the order of the opinions is significantly different. The cluster analysis marked three distinctive patterns of opinions. Improving the performance of the mixed project teams reflected in project success calls for action. Accepting the more professional approach the experienced project team members, the lack of students’ competencies can be designated. Changes must be supported by training activities and rethinking the curricula in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Polytechnica Hungarica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Polytechnica Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.20.9.2023.9.7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Polytechnica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12700/aph.20.9.2023.9.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Product Development: Imagines versus Practice
: The increasingly agile environment requires quick responses, including technological solutions and project management decisions. Former investigations aimed to explore expert opinions about project success factors. This study enhances the investigations to student opinions for establishing a more comprehensive view of the critical issues. A harmonious collaboration based on agreed values and methods has been appreciated. The study used a survey among engineering and business students (n=155) about the success factors of product development projects. The goal was to explore their opinions and compare those with expert opinions. The results show that clear goals are considered very important by both groups. Project meetings, cooperation, and other soft factors are recognized as more important by the experts than by the students. The results confirm that the order of the opinions is significantly different. The cluster analysis marked three distinctive patterns of opinions. Improving the performance of the mixed project teams reflected in project success calls for action. Accepting the more professional approach the experienced project team members, the lack of students’ competencies can be designated. Changes must be supported by training activities and rethinking the curricula in the field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信