评价奥兰加巴德市小学教师阅读障碍知识与态度结构化教学方案的效果

Donit John, Pratibha Arun Chandekar
{"title":"评价奥兰加巴德市小学教师阅读障碍知识与态度结构化教学方案的效果","authors":"Donit John, Pratibha Arun Chandekar","doi":"10.9734/cjast/2023/v42i354233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement: To evaluate the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowledge and Attitude regarding Dyslexia among selected Primary School Teachers in Aurangabad City. Research Objectives: 1. To assess the existing knowledge score regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers. 2. To assess the existing attitude score regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers.3. To correlate the knowledge and attitude among primary school teachers before the administration of structured teaching programme regarding dyslexia. 4. To evaluate the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on knowledge and attitude regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers. 5. To find-out the association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables. 6. To find-out the association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables.
 Research Hypothesis: H01-There is no significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test knowledge score of primary school teachers. H1- There is a significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test knowledge score of primary school teachers. H02- There is no significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test attitude score of primary school teachers. H2- There is a significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test attitude score of primary school teachers. H03- There is no significant correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers before the administration of a structured teaching programme. H3- There is a significant correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers before the administration of a structured teaching programme. H04- There is no significant association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables of primary school teachers. H4- There is a significant association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables. H05- There is no significant association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables. H5- There is a significant association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables.
 Research Methodology: Evaluatory research approach was used with pre-experimental one Group Pre-test post-test among 250 primary school teachers in selected primary schools in Aurangabad city by non- Probability purposive sampling technique for data collection.
 Results: In concern with age, 60(24%) of the teachers had age 26-30 years, 110(44%) of them had age 31-35 years and 80(32%) of them had age above 36 years. There were no teachers from the age group of 20-25. In regards to gender, 120(48%) of them were males and130 (52%) of them were females. In concern with Professional qualification, 60(24%) of them were TTC, 100(40%) of them had B.Ed. And 90(36%) of them had M.Ed. There were no teachers have an additional degree. In regard with years of experience, 20(8%) of them had up to five years of experience, 60(24%) of them had 6 to 10 years of experience, 100(40%) of them had 11 to 15 years of experience and 70(28%) of them had above 15 years of experience. In concern with teaching time with students per day 30(12%) of them were teaching for up to 2 hours per day, 80(32%) of them were teaching for up to 4 hours and 140(56%) of them were teaching for up to 6 hours per day. There were no teachers have above 6 hours of teaching time with students. In concern with the number of students in the class, the majority of 130(52%) of them had 21-25 students in the class. 120(48%) of them had 26-30 students in class and none of them had below 20 and above 31 students in the class. In consider with nature of employment, 175(70%) of them were temporary and 75 (30%) of them were permanent. In regard to with previous experience with a dyslexic child, 170(68%) of them had no previous experience with dyslexic child 80(32%) of them had previous experience with dyslexic child. In considering with teachers undergone any short term training on a dyslexia, 170(68%) of them had never undergone any short term training on dyslexia and 80(32%) of them had attended in short term training and whereas 58(72.5%) participated in short term training, 22(27.5%) attended seminar, and none of them had taken part in any workshop and conference on dyslexia. In regard with any committee regularly discussing about dyslexia, there were 130 (52%) teachers in the schools where have no committee regularly discussing about dyslexia and 120(48%) teachers in the schools where committee regularly discussing about dyslexia, and whereas 77(64%) had special educators and 43(36%) had mobile trainers to regularly discussing about dyslexia. In the pre-test, the majority of 150(60%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 70(28%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 30(12%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia. In consider with pre-test, 220(88%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 30(12%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers regarding dyslexia. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.14 which is positive. It indicates that there is a positive correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary teachers. The strength of this positive correlation was tested using the t-test for the significance of the correlation coefficient. The t-value for this test is 2.22 with 248 degrees of freedom. The corresponding p-value was small (less than 0.05). It is evident that there is a significant positive correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary teachers regarding dyslexia. More the knowledge better is the attitude of primary teachers towards dyslexia. In concern with knowledge pre-test, 150(60%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 70(28%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 30(12%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia, whereas. in the post-test, 30(12%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 80(32%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 140(56%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia. This indicates that the knowledge among primary school teachers regarding dyslexia improved remarkably after the structured teaching programme. A paired t-test was used to calculate the effect of STP on awareness of elementary school instructors regarding dyslexia. The average knowledge score in the pre-test was 11.1 whereas in the post-test score was 20.7. The t-value for this test was 21.8 with 249 degrees of freedom. It is evident that structured teaching is significantly effective in improving the knowledge regarding dyslexia among the primary school teachers. In regard to attitude the pre-test, 220(88%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 30(12%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. In the post-test, 110(44%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 140(56%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. This indicates that the attitude of the primary school teachers towards dyslexia improved remarkably after a structured teaching program. The paired t-test was used to evaluate the outcome of STP on awareness of graded school tutors regarding dyslexia. The average knowledge score in the pre-test was 44.5 which increased to 52.1 in the post-test. The t-value for this test was 15.5 with 249 degrees of freedom. It is evident that structured teaching is significantly effective in improving the attitude towards dyslexia among primary school teachers. Among 10 demographic variables, 9 demographic variables were found to be significant (at 0.05 levels). According to calculated X2 value of age(X2 = 52.6),professional qualification(X2 =43.2), years of experience(X2 =111.1), teaching time with students per day(X2 =35.5), number of students in the class(X2 =10.8), nature of employment(X2 =15.4), previous experience with dyslexic child(X2 =23.5), any additional training on dyslexia(X2 =23.5), and do you have any committee regularly discussing about dyslexia(X2 =10.8)were found to have significant association with the knowledge regarding dyslexia among primary school teacher except gender(X2 =5.8). Among 10 demographic variables, 4 demographic variables were found to be having significant association (at 0.05 levels). According to calculated X2 value of gender (X2 =32.3), professional qualification (X2 =47.5), years of experience (X2 =28.9), and teaching time with students per day (X2 =11.3) were attitude of primary school teachers towards dyslexia. Whereas age in years (X2 =2.3),number of students in the class (X2 =0.3), nature of employment (X2 =0.2), previous experience with dyslexic child (X2 =1.6), have you undergone any additional training on dyslexia (X2 =1.6)and do you have any committee regularly discussing dyslexia (X2 =0.3) had no significant association between post-test attitude score with selected demographic variables.
 Conclusion: The findings revealed that Structured Teaching Programme was highly effective in increasing knowledge and having positive attitude regarding Dyslexia among Primary School teachers in Aurangabad City.","PeriodicalId":10730,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Dyslexia among Selected Primary School Teachers in Aurangabad City\",\"authors\":\"Donit John, Pratibha Arun Chandekar\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/cjast/2023/v42i354233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statement: To evaluate the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowledge and Attitude regarding Dyslexia among selected Primary School Teachers in Aurangabad City. Research Objectives: 1. To assess the existing knowledge score regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers. 2. To assess the existing attitude score regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers.3. To correlate the knowledge and attitude among primary school teachers before the administration of structured teaching programme regarding dyslexia. 4. To evaluate the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on knowledge and attitude regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers. 5. To find-out the association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables. 6. To find-out the association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables.
 Research Hypothesis: H01-There is no significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test knowledge score of primary school teachers. H1- There is a significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test knowledge score of primary school teachers. H02- There is no significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test attitude score of primary school teachers. H2- There is a significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test attitude score of primary school teachers. H03- There is no significant correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers before the administration of a structured teaching programme. H3- There is a significant correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers before the administration of a structured teaching programme. H04- There is no significant association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables of primary school teachers. H4- There is a significant association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables. H05- There is no significant association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables. H5- There is a significant association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables.
 Research Methodology: Evaluatory research approach was used with pre-experimental one Group Pre-test post-test among 250 primary school teachers in selected primary schools in Aurangabad city by non- Probability purposive sampling technique for data collection.
 Results: In concern with age, 60(24%) of the teachers had age 26-30 years, 110(44%) of them had age 31-35 years and 80(32%) of them had age above 36 years. There were no teachers from the age group of 20-25. In regards to gender, 120(48%) of them were males and130 (52%) of them were females. In concern with Professional qualification, 60(24%) of them were TTC, 100(40%) of them had B.Ed. And 90(36%) of them had M.Ed. There were no teachers have an additional degree. In regard with years of experience, 20(8%) of them had up to five years of experience, 60(24%) of them had 6 to 10 years of experience, 100(40%) of them had 11 to 15 years of experience and 70(28%) of them had above 15 years of experience. In concern with teaching time with students per day 30(12%) of them were teaching for up to 2 hours per day, 80(32%) of them were teaching for up to 4 hours and 140(56%) of them were teaching for up to 6 hours per day. There were no teachers have above 6 hours of teaching time with students. In concern with the number of students in the class, the majority of 130(52%) of them had 21-25 students in the class. 120(48%) of them had 26-30 students in class and none of them had below 20 and above 31 students in the class. In consider with nature of employment, 175(70%) of them were temporary and 75 (30%) of them were permanent. In regard to with previous experience with a dyslexic child, 170(68%) of them had no previous experience with dyslexic child 80(32%) of them had previous experience with dyslexic child. In considering with teachers undergone any short term training on a dyslexia, 170(68%) of them had never undergone any short term training on dyslexia and 80(32%) of them had attended in short term training and whereas 58(72.5%) participated in short term training, 22(27.5%) attended seminar, and none of them had taken part in any workshop and conference on dyslexia. In regard with any committee regularly discussing about dyslexia, there were 130 (52%) teachers in the schools where have no committee regularly discussing about dyslexia and 120(48%) teachers in the schools where committee regularly discussing about dyslexia, and whereas 77(64%) had special educators and 43(36%) had mobile trainers to regularly discussing about dyslexia. In the pre-test, the majority of 150(60%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 70(28%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 30(12%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia. In consider with pre-test, 220(88%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 30(12%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers regarding dyslexia. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.14 which is positive. It indicates that there is a positive correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary teachers. The strength of this positive correlation was tested using the t-test for the significance of the correlation coefficient. The t-value for this test is 2.22 with 248 degrees of freedom. The corresponding p-value was small (less than 0.05). It is evident that there is a significant positive correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary teachers regarding dyslexia. More the knowledge better is the attitude of primary teachers towards dyslexia. In concern with knowledge pre-test, 150(60%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 70(28%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 30(12%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia, whereas. in the post-test, 30(12%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 80(32%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 140(56%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia. This indicates that the knowledge among primary school teachers regarding dyslexia improved remarkably after the structured teaching programme. A paired t-test was used to calculate the effect of STP on awareness of elementary school instructors regarding dyslexia. The average knowledge score in the pre-test was 11.1 whereas in the post-test score was 20.7. The t-value for this test was 21.8 with 249 degrees of freedom. It is evident that structured teaching is significantly effective in improving the knowledge regarding dyslexia among the primary school teachers. In regard to attitude the pre-test, 220(88%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 30(12%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. In the post-test, 110(44%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 140(56%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. This indicates that the attitude of the primary school teachers towards dyslexia improved remarkably after a structured teaching program. The paired t-test was used to evaluate the outcome of STP on awareness of graded school tutors regarding dyslexia. The average knowledge score in the pre-test was 44.5 which increased to 52.1 in the post-test. The t-value for this test was 15.5 with 249 degrees of freedom. It is evident that structured teaching is significantly effective in improving the attitude towards dyslexia among primary school teachers. Among 10 demographic variables, 9 demographic variables were found to be significant (at 0.05 levels). According to calculated X2 value of age(X2 = 52.6),professional qualification(X2 =43.2), years of experience(X2 =111.1), teaching time with students per day(X2 =35.5), number of students in the class(X2 =10.8), nature of employment(X2 =15.4), previous experience with dyslexic child(X2 =23.5), any additional training on dyslexia(X2 =23.5), and do you have any committee regularly discussing about dyslexia(X2 =10.8)were found to have significant association with the knowledge regarding dyslexia among primary school teacher except gender(X2 =5.8). Among 10 demographic variables, 4 demographic variables were found to be having significant association (at 0.05 levels). According to calculated X2 value of gender (X2 =32.3), professional qualification (X2 =47.5), years of experience (X2 =28.9), and teaching time with students per day (X2 =11.3) were attitude of primary school teachers towards dyslexia. Whereas age in years (X2 =2.3),number of students in the class (X2 =0.3), nature of employment (X2 =0.2), previous experience with dyslexic child (X2 =1.6), have you undergone any additional training on dyslexia (X2 =1.6)and do you have any committee regularly discussing dyslexia (X2 =0.3) had no significant association between post-test attitude score with selected demographic variables.
 Conclusion: The findings revealed that Structured Teaching Programme was highly effective in increasing knowledge and having positive attitude regarding Dyslexia among Primary School teachers in Aurangabad City.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2023/v42i354233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2023/v42i354233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价奥兰加巴德市小学教师关于阅读障碍知识和态度的结构化教学计划的有效性。研究目标:1;目的评估小学教师阅读障碍知识现状。2. 二、探讨小学教师对阅读障碍的态度得分现状。目的探讨小学教师在实施结构化教学计划前对阅读障碍的认知与态度。4. 评价结构化教学方案对小学教师阅读障碍知识和态度的影响。5. 找出测验后知识得分与所选人口学变量之间的关系。6. 找出测试后态度得分与所选人口学变量之间的关系。
研究假设:h01 -小学教师测前平均分与测后平均分之间无显著差异。H1-小学教师测前平均分与测后平均分存在显著差异。H02-小学教师测前、测后态度平均分差异无统计学意义。H2-小学教师的前测态度平均分与后测态度平均分存在显著差异。H03-在实施结构化教学计划之前,小学教师的知识和态度之间没有显著的相关关系。H3-在实施结构化教学计划之前,小学教师的知识和态度之间存在显著的相关关系。H04-小学教师测验后知识得分与其所选人口学变量之间无显著相关。H4-测试后的知识得分与他们选择的人口统计变量之间存在显著的关联。H05-测验后态度得分与他们选择的人口学变量之间没有显著的关联。H5-测试后态度得分与他们选择的人口学变量之间存在显著关联。
研究方法:采用评价性研究方法,对奥兰加巴德市选定的250名小学教师采用非概率有目的抽样技术进行数据收集,采用预实验一组前测试后测试的方法。
结果:年龄方面,26 ~ 30岁教师占60人(24%),31 ~ 35岁教师占110人(44%),36岁以上教师占80人(32%)。没有20-25岁年龄段的教师。性别方面,男性120人(48%),女性130人(52%)。在专业资格方面,有60人(24%)为TTC, 100人(40%)为学士学位,90人(36%)为硕士学位。没有教师拥有额外的学位。在工作经验方面,20人(8%)的工作经验达5年,60人(24%)的工作经验达6至10年,100人(40%)的工作经验达11至15年,70人(28%)的工作经验达15年以上。在每天与学生的教学时间方面,30名教师(12%)每天的教学时间长达2小时,80名教师(32%)每天的教学时间长达4小时,140名教师(56%)每天的教学时间长达6小时。没有老师与学生的教学时间超过6小时。在学生人数方面,130多所学校(52%)的学生人数在21-25人之间。其中120家(48%)的班级人数在26-30人之间,没有一家班级人数在20人以下,没有一家班级人数在31人以上。考虑到雇用的性质,其中175人(70%)是临时雇员,75人(30%)是长期雇员。在有治疗失读症儿童的经验方面,170人(68%)没有治疗失读症儿童的经验,80人(32%)有治疗失读症儿童的经验。在接受过短期培训的教师中,170人(68%)从未接受过短期培训,80人(32%)参加过短期培训,58人(72.5%)参加过短期培训,22人(27.5%)参加过研讨会,没有人参加过任何关于阅读障碍的研讨会和会议。关于任何定期讨论阅读障碍的委员会,在没有委员会定期讨论阅读障碍的学校中有130名(52%)教师,在委员会定期讨论阅读障碍的学校中有120名(48%)教师,而77名(64%)教师有特殊教育者,43名(36%)教师有流动培训师定期讨论阅读障碍。在前测中,150名(60%)小学教师对阅读障碍的认知较差(0-10分),70名(28%)教师对阅读障碍的认知一般(11-20分),30名(12%)教师对阅读障碍的认知较好(21-30分)。 考虑到前测结果,220名(88%)小学教师对阅读障碍有消极态度(得分20-50),30名(12%)教师对阅读障碍有积极态度(得分51-80)。采用Pearson相关系数评估小学教师阅读障碍知识与态度的相关关系。Pearson相关系数为0.14,为正相关。结果表明,小学教师的知识与态度之间存在正相关关系。使用t检验相关系数的显著性来检验这种正相关的强度。该检验的t值为2.22,自由度为248。相应的p值较小(小于0.05)。小学教师对阅读障碍的认知与态度显著正相关。知识越多越好是小学教师对待阅读障碍的态度。在知识前测方面,150名(60%)的小学教师对阅读障碍的知识贫乏(0-10分),70名(28%)的教师对阅读障碍的知识贫乏(11-20分),30名(12%)的教师对阅读障碍的知识贫乏(21-30分)。在后测中,30名小学教师对阅读障碍的认知较差(0-10分),占12%;80名教师对阅读障碍的认知一般(11-20分),占32%;140名教师对阅读障碍的认知较好(21-30分),占56%。这表明,在结构化教学计划后,小学教师对阅读障碍的认识有了显著提高。采用配对t检验计算STP对小学教师阅读障碍认知的影响。前测平均分为11.1分,后测平均分为20.7分。该检验的t值为21.8,自由度为249。结果表明,结构化教学在提高小学教师阅读障碍知识方面具有显著效果。在前测态度方面,220名(88%)小学教师对阅读障碍持否定态度(20 ~ 50分),30名(12%)小学教师对阅读障碍持积极态度(51 ~ 80分)。后测中,110名(44%)小学教师对阅读障碍持否定态度(得分20 ~ 50),140名(56%)小学教师对阅读障碍持肯定态度(得分51 ~ 80)。这表明小学教师对阅读障碍的态度在结构化教学计划后显著改善。采用配对t检验评价STP对分级学校教师阅读障碍认知的影响。前测平均知识得分为44.5分,后测平均知识得分为52.1分。该检验的t值为15.5,自由度为249。结果表明,结构化教学对改善小学教师对待阅读障碍的态度有显著效果。10个人口学变量中,9个人口学变量显著(0.05水平)。根据年龄(X2 = 52.6)、专业资格(X2 =43.2)、经验年数(X2 =111.1)、每天与学生的教学时间(X2 =35.5)、班级人数(X2 =10.8)、就业性质(X2 =15.4)、以往与读写困难儿童的接触经验(X2 =23.5)、是否接受过读写困难方面的额外培训(X2 =23.5),是否有委员会定期讨论阅读障碍(X2 =10.8)除性别外,与小学教师对阅读障碍的认知有显著相关(X2 =5.8)。在10个人口学变量中,有4个人口学变量存在显著相关性(0.05水平)。根据计算得出的性别(X2 =32.3)、专业资格(X2 =47.5)、工作年限(X2 =28.9)、每天与学生相处时间(X2 =11.3)的X2值分别为小学教师对阅读障碍的态度。然而,年龄(X2 =2.3)、班级学生人数(X2 =0.3)、就业性质(X2 =0.2)、以前有过读写困难儿童的经历(X2 =1.6)、您是否接受过读写困难的额外培训(X2 =1.6)以及您是否有任何委员会定期讨论读写困难(X2 =0.3)在测试后态度得分与所选人口统计学变量之间没有显著关联。
结论:结构化教学计划在提高奥兰加巴德市小学教师对阅读障碍的认识和积极态度方面效果显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To Evaluate the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Dyslexia among Selected Primary School Teachers in Aurangabad City
Statement: To evaluate the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme on Knowledge and Attitude regarding Dyslexia among selected Primary School Teachers in Aurangabad City. Research Objectives: 1. To assess the existing knowledge score regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers. 2. To assess the existing attitude score regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers.3. To correlate the knowledge and attitude among primary school teachers before the administration of structured teaching programme regarding dyslexia. 4. To evaluate the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on knowledge and attitude regarding dyslexia among primary school teachers. 5. To find-out the association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables. 6. To find-out the association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables. Research Hypothesis: H01-There is no significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test knowledge score of primary school teachers. H1- There is a significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test knowledge score of primary school teachers. H02- There is no significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test attitude score of primary school teachers. H2- There is a significant difference between mean pre-test and post-test attitude score of primary school teachers. H03- There is no significant correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers before the administration of a structured teaching programme. H3- There is a significant correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers before the administration of a structured teaching programme. H04- There is no significant association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables of primary school teachers. H4- There is a significant association between post-test knowledge score with their selected demographic variables. H05- There is no significant association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables. H5- There is a significant association between post-test attitude score with their selected demographic variables. Research Methodology: Evaluatory research approach was used with pre-experimental one Group Pre-test post-test among 250 primary school teachers in selected primary schools in Aurangabad city by non- Probability purposive sampling technique for data collection. Results: In concern with age, 60(24%) of the teachers had age 26-30 years, 110(44%) of them had age 31-35 years and 80(32%) of them had age above 36 years. There were no teachers from the age group of 20-25. In regards to gender, 120(48%) of them were males and130 (52%) of them were females. In concern with Professional qualification, 60(24%) of them were TTC, 100(40%) of them had B.Ed. And 90(36%) of them had M.Ed. There were no teachers have an additional degree. In regard with years of experience, 20(8%) of them had up to five years of experience, 60(24%) of them had 6 to 10 years of experience, 100(40%) of them had 11 to 15 years of experience and 70(28%) of them had above 15 years of experience. In concern with teaching time with students per day 30(12%) of them were teaching for up to 2 hours per day, 80(32%) of them were teaching for up to 4 hours and 140(56%) of them were teaching for up to 6 hours per day. There were no teachers have above 6 hours of teaching time with students. In concern with the number of students in the class, the majority of 130(52%) of them had 21-25 students in the class. 120(48%) of them had 26-30 students in class and none of them had below 20 and above 31 students in the class. In consider with nature of employment, 175(70%) of them were temporary and 75 (30%) of them were permanent. In regard to with previous experience with a dyslexic child, 170(68%) of them had no previous experience with dyslexic child 80(32%) of them had previous experience with dyslexic child. In considering with teachers undergone any short term training on a dyslexia, 170(68%) of them had never undergone any short term training on dyslexia and 80(32%) of them had attended in short term training and whereas 58(72.5%) participated in short term training, 22(27.5%) attended seminar, and none of them had taken part in any workshop and conference on dyslexia. In regard with any committee regularly discussing about dyslexia, there were 130 (52%) teachers in the schools where have no committee regularly discussing about dyslexia and 120(48%) teachers in the schools where committee regularly discussing about dyslexia, and whereas 77(64%) had special educators and 43(36%) had mobile trainers to regularly discussing about dyslexia. In the pre-test, the majority of 150(60%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 70(28%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 30(12%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia. In consider with pre-test, 220(88%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 30(12%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary school teachers regarding dyslexia. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.14 which is positive. It indicates that there is a positive correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary teachers. The strength of this positive correlation was tested using the t-test for the significance of the correlation coefficient. The t-value for this test is 2.22 with 248 degrees of freedom. The corresponding p-value was small (less than 0.05). It is evident that there is a significant positive correlation between knowledge and attitude of primary teachers regarding dyslexia. More the knowledge better is the attitude of primary teachers towards dyslexia. In concern with knowledge pre-test, 150(60%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 70(28%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 30(12%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia, whereas. in the post-test, 30(12%) of the primary school teachers had poor knowledge (score 0-10), 80(32%) of them had average knowledge (score 11-20) and 140(56%) of them had good knowledge (score 21-30) regarding dyslexia. This indicates that the knowledge among primary school teachers regarding dyslexia improved remarkably after the structured teaching programme. A paired t-test was used to calculate the effect of STP on awareness of elementary school instructors regarding dyslexia. The average knowledge score in the pre-test was 11.1 whereas in the post-test score was 20.7. The t-value for this test was 21.8 with 249 degrees of freedom. It is evident that structured teaching is significantly effective in improving the knowledge regarding dyslexia among the primary school teachers. In regard to attitude the pre-test, 220(88%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 30(12%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. In the post-test, 110(44%) of the primary school teachers had a negative attitude (score 20-50) and 140(56%) of them had a positive attitude (Score 51-80) towards dyslexia. This indicates that the attitude of the primary school teachers towards dyslexia improved remarkably after a structured teaching program. The paired t-test was used to evaluate the outcome of STP on awareness of graded school tutors regarding dyslexia. The average knowledge score in the pre-test was 44.5 which increased to 52.1 in the post-test. The t-value for this test was 15.5 with 249 degrees of freedom. It is evident that structured teaching is significantly effective in improving the attitude towards dyslexia among primary school teachers. Among 10 demographic variables, 9 demographic variables were found to be significant (at 0.05 levels). According to calculated X2 value of age(X2 = 52.6),professional qualification(X2 =43.2), years of experience(X2 =111.1), teaching time with students per day(X2 =35.5), number of students in the class(X2 =10.8), nature of employment(X2 =15.4), previous experience with dyslexic child(X2 =23.5), any additional training on dyslexia(X2 =23.5), and do you have any committee regularly discussing about dyslexia(X2 =10.8)were found to have significant association with the knowledge regarding dyslexia among primary school teacher except gender(X2 =5.8). Among 10 demographic variables, 4 demographic variables were found to be having significant association (at 0.05 levels). According to calculated X2 value of gender (X2 =32.3), professional qualification (X2 =47.5), years of experience (X2 =28.9), and teaching time with students per day (X2 =11.3) were attitude of primary school teachers towards dyslexia. Whereas age in years (X2 =2.3),number of students in the class (X2 =0.3), nature of employment (X2 =0.2), previous experience with dyslexic child (X2 =1.6), have you undergone any additional training on dyslexia (X2 =1.6)and do you have any committee regularly discussing dyslexia (X2 =0.3) had no significant association between post-test attitude score with selected demographic variables. Conclusion: The findings revealed that Structured Teaching Programme was highly effective in increasing knowledge and having positive attitude regarding Dyslexia among Primary School teachers in Aurangabad City.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信