氨甲环酸预防产后出血:系统评价方案和个体患者数据荟萃分析

Katharine Ker, Haleema Shakur-Still, Loïc Sentilhes, Luis D. Pacheco, George Saade, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Amy Brenner, Raoul Mansukhani, François-Xavier Ageron, Danielle Prowse, Rizwana Chaudhri, Oladapo Olayemi, Ian Roberts
{"title":"氨甲环酸预防产后出血:系统评价方案和个体患者数据荟萃分析","authors":"Katharine Ker, Haleema Shakur-Still, Loïc Sentilhes, Luis D. Pacheco, George Saade, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Amy Brenner, Raoul Mansukhani, François-Xavier Ageron, Danielle Prowse, Rizwana Chaudhri, Oladapo Olayemi, Ian Roberts","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.13747.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<ns4:p><ns4:bold>Background</ns4:bold>: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces the risk of death and is recommended as a treatment for women with severe postpartum bleeding. There is hope that giving TXA shortly before or immediately after birth could prevent postpartum bleeding. Extending the use of TXA to prevent harmful postpartum bleeding could improve outcomes for millions of women; however, we must carefully consider the balance of benefits and potential harms. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of TXA for preventing postpartum bleeding, and to explore how the effects vary by underlying risk and other patient characteristics.</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods</ns4:bold>: We will search for prospectively registered, randomised controlled trials involving 500 patients or more assessing the effects of TXA in women giving birth. Two authors will extract data and assess risk of bias. IPD data will be sought from eligible trials. Primary outcomes will be life-threatening bleeding and thromboembolic events. We will use a one-stage model to analyse the data. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to explore whether the effectiveness and safety of TXA varies by underlying risk, type birth, maternal haemoglobin (Hb), and timing of TXA. </ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions</ns4:bold>: This systematic review and IPD meta-analysis will address important clinical questions about the effectiveness and safety of the use of TXA for the prevention of postpartum bleeding that cannot be answered reliably using aggregate data and will inform the decision of who to treat.</ns4:p><ns4:p> </ns4:p><ns4:p> PROSPERO registration: CRD42022345775</ns4:p>","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum bleeding: Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Katharine Ker, Haleema Shakur-Still, Loïc Sentilhes, Luis D. Pacheco, George Saade, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Amy Brenner, Raoul Mansukhani, François-Xavier Ageron, Danielle Prowse, Rizwana Chaudhri, Oladapo Olayemi, Ian Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/gatesopenres.13747.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<ns4:p><ns4:bold>Background</ns4:bold>: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces the risk of death and is recommended as a treatment for women with severe postpartum bleeding. There is hope that giving TXA shortly before or immediately after birth could prevent postpartum bleeding. Extending the use of TXA to prevent harmful postpartum bleeding could improve outcomes for millions of women; however, we must carefully consider the balance of benefits and potential harms. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of TXA for preventing postpartum bleeding, and to explore how the effects vary by underlying risk and other patient characteristics.</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods</ns4:bold>: We will search for prospectively registered, randomised controlled trials involving 500 patients or more assessing the effects of TXA in women giving birth. Two authors will extract data and assess risk of bias. IPD data will be sought from eligible trials. Primary outcomes will be life-threatening bleeding and thromboembolic events. We will use a one-stage model to analyse the data. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to explore whether the effectiveness and safety of TXA varies by underlying risk, type birth, maternal haemoglobin (Hb), and timing of TXA. </ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions</ns4:bold>: This systematic review and IPD meta-analysis will address important clinical questions about the effectiveness and safety of the use of TXA for the prevention of postpartum bleeding that cannot be answered reliably using aggregate data and will inform the decision of who to treat.</ns4:p><ns4:p> </ns4:p><ns4:p> PROSPERO registration: CRD42022345775</ns4:p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13747.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13747.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:氨甲环酸(TXA)可降低死亡风险,被推荐用于重度产后出血妇女的治疗。有希望在分娩前不久或分娩后立即给予TXA可以防止产后出血。扩大使用TXA来预防有害的产后出血可以改善数百万妇女的结局;然而,我们必须仔细考虑利益和潜在危害的平衡。本文介绍了一项系统评价和个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析的方案,以评估TXA预防产后出血的有效性和安全性,并探讨其效果如何随潜在风险和其他患者特征而变化。方法:我们将检索前瞻性注册的随机对照试验,涉及500例或更多患者,评估TXA对分娩妇女的影响。两位作者将提取数据并评估偏倚风险。IPD数据将从符合条件的试验中寻求。主要结局将是危及生命的出血和血栓栓塞事件。我们将使用一个单阶段模型来分析数据。将进行亚组分析,以探讨TXA的有效性和安全性是否因潜在风险、出生类型、母体血红蛋白(Hb)和TXA的时间而变化。结论:本系统综述和IPD荟萃分析将解决有关使用TXA预防产后出血的有效性和安全性的重要临床问题,这些问题无法通过汇总数据可靠地回答,并将为决定谁治疗提供信息。普洛斯彼罗注册:CRD42022345775
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tranexamic acid for the prevention of postpartum bleeding: Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces the risk of death and is recommended as a treatment for women with severe postpartum bleeding. There is hope that giving TXA shortly before or immediately after birth could prevent postpartum bleeding. Extending the use of TXA to prevent harmful postpartum bleeding could improve outcomes for millions of women; however, we must carefully consider the balance of benefits and potential harms. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness and safety of TXA for preventing postpartum bleeding, and to explore how the effects vary by underlying risk and other patient characteristics. Methods: We will search for prospectively registered, randomised controlled trials involving 500 patients or more assessing the effects of TXA in women giving birth. Two authors will extract data and assess risk of bias. IPD data will be sought from eligible trials. Primary outcomes will be life-threatening bleeding and thromboembolic events. We will use a one-stage model to analyse the data. Subgroup analyses will be conducted to explore whether the effectiveness and safety of TXA varies by underlying risk, type birth, maternal haemoglobin (Hb), and timing of TXA. Conclusions: This systematic review and IPD meta-analysis will address important clinical questions about the effectiveness and safety of the use of TXA for the prevention of postpartum bleeding that cannot be answered reliably using aggregate data and will inform the decision of who to treat. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022345775
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信