伊拉克和叙利亚的语言政策及其影响

{"title":"伊拉克和叙利亚的语言政策及其影响","authors":"","doi":"10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article covers the language policies of Iraq and Syria. It aims to compare the language policies of both states, as well as the results and consequences of these policies. The paper met the research through the extensive analysis of reports and articles produced by different NGOs, think tanks, different academic centers as well as by official documents adopted by the Iraq and Syria. The H. Linz’s and A. Stepan’s typology of state and nation building was used to compare the language policies of Iraq and Syria. The author concludes that Syria and Iraq, both being multi-ethnic states, have completely different language policies towards ethnic minorities. The ultimate goal of both policies is the formation of a single national identity. The aim of Syria's strategy is the gradual assimilation of minorities and therefore only the Arabic language has official status in the country; the use of minority languages is limited. Iraq has taken a course towards the gradual integration of minorities; country recognizes its linguistic diversity, and both state and non-state institutions actively use minority languages. The language policies of both countries had varying success and resulting in both positive and negative consequences.","PeriodicalId":31282,"journal":{"name":"Vlast'' Moskva","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Языковые политики Ирака и Сирии и их эффекты\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article covers the language policies of Iraq and Syria. It aims to compare the language policies of both states, as well as the results and consequences of these policies. The paper met the research through the extensive analysis of reports and articles produced by different NGOs, think tanks, different academic centers as well as by official documents adopted by the Iraq and Syria. The H. Linz’s and A. Stepan’s typology of state and nation building was used to compare the language policies of Iraq and Syria. The author concludes that Syria and Iraq, both being multi-ethnic states, have completely different language policies towards ethnic minorities. The ultimate goal of both policies is the formation of a single national identity. The aim of Syria's strategy is the gradual assimilation of minorities and therefore only the Arabic language has official status in the country; the use of minority languages is limited. Iraq has taken a course towards the gradual integration of minorities; country recognizes its linguistic diversity, and both state and non-state institutions actively use minority languages. The language policies of both countries had varying success and resulting in both positive and negative consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vlast'' Moskva\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vlast'' Moskva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vlast'' Moskva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章涉及伊拉克和叙利亚的语言政策。它的目的是比较两国的语言政策,以及这些政策的结果和后果。本文通过广泛分析不同非政府组织、智库、不同学术中心的报告和文章,以及伊拉克和叙利亚通过的官方文件,来满足研究。林茨(H. Linz)和斯捷潘(A. Stepan)的国家和民族建设类型被用来比较伊拉克和叙利亚的语言政策。作者的结论是,叙利亚和伊拉克都是多民族国家,对少数民族的语言政策完全不同。这两项政策的最终目标都是形成单一的民族认同。叙利亚战略的目的是逐渐同化少数民族,因此只有阿拉伯语在该国具有官方地位;少数民族语言的使用是有限的。伊拉克已经走上了少数民族逐步融合的道路;国家承认语言的多样性,国家和非国家机构都积极使用少数民族语言。两国的语言政策都取得了不同程度的成功,并产生了积极和消极的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Языковые политики Ирака и Сирии и их эффекты
The article covers the language policies of Iraq and Syria. It aims to compare the language policies of both states, as well as the results and consequences of these policies. The paper met the research through the extensive analysis of reports and articles produced by different NGOs, think tanks, different academic centers as well as by official documents adopted by the Iraq and Syria. The H. Linz’s and A. Stepan’s typology of state and nation building was used to compare the language policies of Iraq and Syria. The author concludes that Syria and Iraq, both being multi-ethnic states, have completely different language policies towards ethnic minorities. The ultimate goal of both policies is the formation of a single national identity. The aim of Syria's strategy is the gradual assimilation of minorities and therefore only the Arabic language has official status in the country; the use of minority languages is limited. Iraq has taken a course towards the gradual integration of minorities; country recognizes its linguistic diversity, and both state and non-state institutions actively use minority languages. The language policies of both countries had varying success and resulting in both positive and negative consequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信