活根或施用植物残体或肥料后12年的土壤碳

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Stewart B Wuest
{"title":"活根或施用植物残体或肥料后12年的土壤碳","authors":"Stewart B Wuest","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Soil organic carbon was measured after surface application of equal C amounts from various carbon sources to fallow soil or a winter wheat crop for five consecutive years. Municipal biosolid produced the largest gain, followed by manure and alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) foliage. Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) straw, sucrose, and wood sawdust were not different than no addition. These effects were additive to and independent from the effect of fallow soil versus cropped soil. Soil cropped to winter wheat increased in carbon comparable to the biosolid application or to plots planted to perennial grass. Measurements 4, 6, and 12 years after a return to normal farming practices produced no change in relative or quantitative differences. These results illuminate the durability of above‐ and below‐ground contributions to soil carbon. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":22142,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil carbon twelve years after live roots or application of plant residues or manure\",\"authors\":\"Stewart B Wuest\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.20597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Soil organic carbon was measured after surface application of equal C amounts from various carbon sources to fallow soil or a winter wheat crop for five consecutive years. Municipal biosolid produced the largest gain, followed by manure and alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) foliage. Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) straw, sucrose, and wood sawdust were not different than no addition. These effects were additive to and independent from the effect of fallow soil versus cropped soil. Soil cropped to winter wheat increased in carbon comparable to the biosolid application or to plots planted to perennial grass. Measurements 4, 6, and 12 years after a return to normal farming practices produced no change in relative or quantitative differences. These results illuminate the durability of above‐ and below‐ground contributions to soil carbon. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved\",\"PeriodicalId\":22142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Science Society of America Journal\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Science Society of America Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20597\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20597","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要采用不同碳源对休耕土壤或冬小麦作物连续施用等量碳,测定土壤有机碳含量。城市生物固体产生了最大的收益,其次是粪肥和苜蓿叶。小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)秸秆、蔗糖和木屑与未添加的差异不大。这些影响与休耕土壤和作物土壤的影响是叠加的,独立于休耕土壤和作物土壤的影响。种植冬小麦的土壤碳的增加与施用生物固体或种植多年生草的土壤碳的增加相当。恢复正常耕作方式后4、6和12年的测量结果显示,相对或数量差异没有变化。这些结果阐明了地上和地下对土壤碳贡献的持久性。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil carbon twelve years after live roots or application of plant residues or manure
ABSTRACT Soil organic carbon was measured after surface application of equal C amounts from various carbon sources to fallow soil or a winter wheat crop for five consecutive years. Municipal biosolid produced the largest gain, followed by manure and alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) foliage. Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) straw, sucrose, and wood sawdust were not different than no addition. These effects were additive to and independent from the effect of fallow soil versus cropped soil. Soil cropped to winter wheat increased in carbon comparable to the biosolid application or to plots planted to perennial grass. Measurements 4, 6, and 12 years after a return to normal farming practices produced no change in relative or quantitative differences. These results illuminate the durability of above‐ and below‐ground contributions to soil carbon. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
130
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: SSSA Journal publishes content on soil physics; hydrology; soil chemistry; soil biology; soil biochemistry; soil fertility; plant nutrition; pedology; soil and water conservation and management; forest, range, and wildland soils; soil and plant analysis; soil mineralogy, wetland soils. The audience is researchers, students, soil scientists, hydrologists, pedologist, geologists, agronomists, arborists, ecologists, engineers, certified practitioners, soil microbiologists, and environmentalists. The journal publishes original research, issue papers, reviews, notes, comments and letters to the editor, and book reviews. Invitational papers may be published in the journal if accepted by the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信