“模棱两可在美国脱口秀话语中的作用”

None *Yu. O. Kamesheva, None B. K. Zhumabekova, None B. D. Nygmetova
{"title":"“模棱两可在美国脱口秀话语中的作用”","authors":"None *Yu. O. Kamesheva, None B. K. Zhumabekova, None B. D. Nygmetova","doi":"10.48081/wjjs4338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This research article investigates the prevalent utilization of hedging strategies in the context of American talk show discourse. Through a comprehensive analysis of a diverse range of talk show episodes, this study aims to shed light on how participants in these shows employ hedging to navigate sensitive and contentious topics while maintaining a diplomatic and non-committal stance. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative discourse analysis and quantitative content analysis to identify and categorize various hedging devices used by talk show hosts and guests. Additionally, the study examines the motivations behind the use of hedging in this particular communicative context. Results indicate that hedging is a prominent feature of American talk show discourse. Hosts and guests often use hedge words and phrases, such as «maybe», «like», «you know», «I think», «I see», etc., to soften their statements and express uncertainty. Furthermore, the research finds that hedging is strategically utilized as a means to evade answering difficult questions, diplomatically discuss controversial topics, and protect personal image and credibility. By adopting a hedging approach, participants create an environment conducive to open dialogue, encouraging diverse viewpoints. The findings of this research contribute to the role of hedging in shaping the discourse. The insights gained from this study can be of value to communication scholars, media practitioners, and anyone interested in comprehending the intricacies of language use in American talk show settings. Also, the study serves as a stepping stone for further research on linguistic strategies used in various media contexts and their impact on audience perceptions and engagement. Keywords: hedging, talk show discourse, hedging language, communication, media discourse. \"","PeriodicalId":491498,"journal":{"name":"Вестник Торайгыров университета","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"THE ROLE OF HEDGING IN AMERICAN TALK SHOW DISCOURSE \\\"\",\"authors\":\"None *Yu. O. Kamesheva, None B. K. Zhumabekova, None B. D. Nygmetova\",\"doi\":\"10.48081/wjjs4338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"This research article investigates the prevalent utilization of hedging strategies in the context of American talk show discourse. Through a comprehensive analysis of a diverse range of talk show episodes, this study aims to shed light on how participants in these shows employ hedging to navigate sensitive and contentious topics while maintaining a diplomatic and non-committal stance. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative discourse analysis and quantitative content analysis to identify and categorize various hedging devices used by talk show hosts and guests. Additionally, the study examines the motivations behind the use of hedging in this particular communicative context. Results indicate that hedging is a prominent feature of American talk show discourse. Hosts and guests often use hedge words and phrases, such as «maybe», «like», «you know», «I think», «I see», etc., to soften their statements and express uncertainty. Furthermore, the research finds that hedging is strategically utilized as a means to evade answering difficult questions, diplomatically discuss controversial topics, and protect personal image and credibility. By adopting a hedging approach, participants create an environment conducive to open dialogue, encouraging diverse viewpoints. The findings of this research contribute to the role of hedging in shaping the discourse. The insights gained from this study can be of value to communication scholars, media practitioners, and anyone interested in comprehending the intricacies of language use in American talk show settings. Also, the study serves as a stepping stone for further research on linguistic strategies used in various media contexts and their impact on audience perceptions and engagement. Keywords: hedging, talk show discourse, hedging language, communication, media discourse. \\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":491498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Вестник Торайгыров университета\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Вестник Торайгыров университета\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48081/wjjs4338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вестник Торайгыров университета","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48081/wjjs4338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了在美国脱口秀话语语境中,套期保值策略的普遍使用。通过对各种脱口秀节目的综合分析,本研究旨在揭示这些节目的参与者如何在保持外交和不承诺立场的同时,利用对冲来驾驭敏感和有争议的话题。本研究采用混合方法,将定性话语分析和定量内容分析相结合,对脱口秀主持人和嘉宾使用的各种模糊限制语进行识别和分类。此外,该研究还考察了在这种特定交际语境中使用模糊取舍的动机。结果表明,限制语是美国脱口秀语篇的一个显著特征。主人和客人经常使用模棱两可的词语和短语,如“也许”、“像”、“你知道”、“我认为”、“我看到”等,以软化他们的陈述,表达不确定。此外,研究发现,对冲被战略性地用作逃避回答难题、外交地讨论有争议的话题、保护个人形象和可信度的手段。通过采取对冲方法,参与者创造了一个有利于公开对话的环境,鼓励不同的观点。本研究的发现有助于解释限制语在语篇塑造中的作用。从这项研究中获得的见解对传播学者、媒体从业者以及任何对理解美国脱口秀环境中语言使用的复杂性感兴趣的人都有价值。此外,本研究为进一步研究各种媒体语境下的语言策略及其对受众感知和参与的影响奠定了基础。关键词:模棱两可,脱口秀话语,模棱两可语言,交际,媒介话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"THE ROLE OF HEDGING IN AMERICAN TALK SHOW DISCOURSE "
"This research article investigates the prevalent utilization of hedging strategies in the context of American talk show discourse. Through a comprehensive analysis of a diverse range of talk show episodes, this study aims to shed light on how participants in these shows employ hedging to navigate sensitive and contentious topics while maintaining a diplomatic and non-committal stance. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative discourse analysis and quantitative content analysis to identify and categorize various hedging devices used by talk show hosts and guests. Additionally, the study examines the motivations behind the use of hedging in this particular communicative context. Results indicate that hedging is a prominent feature of American talk show discourse. Hosts and guests often use hedge words and phrases, such as «maybe», «like», «you know», «I think», «I see», etc., to soften their statements and express uncertainty. Furthermore, the research finds that hedging is strategically utilized as a means to evade answering difficult questions, diplomatically discuss controversial topics, and protect personal image and credibility. By adopting a hedging approach, participants create an environment conducive to open dialogue, encouraging diverse viewpoints. The findings of this research contribute to the role of hedging in shaping the discourse. The insights gained from this study can be of value to communication scholars, media practitioners, and anyone interested in comprehending the intricacies of language use in American talk show settings. Also, the study serves as a stepping stone for further research on linguistic strategies used in various media contexts and their impact on audience perceptions and engagement. Keywords: hedging, talk show discourse, hedging language, communication, media discourse. "
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信