研究红杉和国王峡谷国家公园的水生物种分布:溪流中视觉和环境DNA调查的比较

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Colleen Kamoroff, Erik Meyer, Caren S. Goldberg, Saramae Parker, Matthew M. Smith, Joshua S. Reece
{"title":"研究红杉和国王峡谷国家公园的水生物种分布:溪流中视觉和环境DNA调查的比较","authors":"Colleen Kamoroff, Erik Meyer, Caren S. Goldberg, Saramae Parker, Matthew M. Smith, Joshua S. Reece","doi":"10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biodiversity monitoring is a difficult and expensive activity that is chronically underfunded. Visual Encounter Surveys (VES) are a common monitoring tool for poikilothermic organisms in streams and rivers, but many species are challenging to detect with this method. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods have been growing in popularity as a supplement or replacement for VES for aquatic species, but they are not yet widely adopted, in part due to perceived costs, a lack of understanding about their efficacy, and a lack of technical expertise. We implemented a paired VES and eDNA survey of 13 species (6 native and 7 invasive) in three rivers within and around Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI). We found that species detection using eDNA methods was consistently higher compared to traditional snorkel VES, and eDNA was an accurate, cost-effective method for detecting biodiversity. Using eDNA and VES techniques, we were able to conduct a survey of aquatic biodiversity in areas within and neighboring the SEKI boundary. Our work highlights the potential for eDNA methods to be used in conjunction with traditional VES to minimize costs and improve capacity for resource management.","PeriodicalId":49780,"journal":{"name":"Natural Areas Journal","volume":" 38","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Aquatic Species Distributions for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks: A Comparison of Visual and Environmental DNA Surveys in Streams\",\"authors\":\"Colleen Kamoroff, Erik Meyer, Caren S. Goldberg, Saramae Parker, Matthew M. Smith, Joshua S. Reece\",\"doi\":\"10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biodiversity monitoring is a difficult and expensive activity that is chronically underfunded. Visual Encounter Surveys (VES) are a common monitoring tool for poikilothermic organisms in streams and rivers, but many species are challenging to detect with this method. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods have been growing in popularity as a supplement or replacement for VES for aquatic species, but they are not yet widely adopted, in part due to perceived costs, a lack of understanding about their efficacy, and a lack of technical expertise. We implemented a paired VES and eDNA survey of 13 species (6 native and 7 invasive) in three rivers within and around Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI). We found that species detection using eDNA methods was consistently higher compared to traditional snorkel VES, and eDNA was an accurate, cost-effective method for detecting biodiversity. Using eDNA and VES techniques, we were able to conduct a survey of aquatic biodiversity in areas within and neighboring the SEKI boundary. Our work highlights the potential for eDNA methods to be used in conjunction with traditional VES to minimize costs and improve capacity for resource management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"volume\":\" 38\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Areas Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物多样性监测是一项困难而昂贵的活动,长期资金不足。视觉接触调查(VES)是一种常见的监测溪流和河流中变热生物的工具,但许多物种很难用这种方法检测到。环境DNA (eDNA)检测方法作为水生物种VES的补充或替代方法越来越受欢迎,但尚未被广泛采用,部分原因是成本、对其功效缺乏了解以及缺乏技术专长。本文对红杉和国王峡谷国家公园(SEKI)内及周边三条河流中的13种物种(6种本地物种和7种入侵物种)进行了配对的VES和eDNA调查。我们发现,与传统的浮潜探测方法相比,eDNA方法的物种检漏率始终较高,并且eDNA是一种准确、经济的生物多样性检测方法。利用eDNA和VES技术,我们对SEKI边界内和边界附近的水生生物多样性进行了调查。我们的工作强调了eDNA方法与传统VES结合使用的潜力,以最大限度地降低成本并提高资源管理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Aquatic Species Distributions for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks: A Comparison of Visual and Environmental DNA Surveys in Streams
Biodiversity monitoring is a difficult and expensive activity that is chronically underfunded. Visual Encounter Surveys (VES) are a common monitoring tool for poikilothermic organisms in streams and rivers, but many species are challenging to detect with this method. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods have been growing in popularity as a supplement or replacement for VES for aquatic species, but they are not yet widely adopted, in part due to perceived costs, a lack of understanding about their efficacy, and a lack of technical expertise. We implemented a paired VES and eDNA survey of 13 species (6 native and 7 invasive) in three rivers within and around Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI). We found that species detection using eDNA methods was consistently higher compared to traditional snorkel VES, and eDNA was an accurate, cost-effective method for detecting biodiversity. Using eDNA and VES techniques, we were able to conduct a survey of aquatic biodiversity in areas within and neighboring the SEKI boundary. Our work highlights the potential for eDNA methods to be used in conjunction with traditional VES to minimize costs and improve capacity for resource management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Areas Journal
Natural Areas Journal 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Natural Areas Journal is the flagship publication of the Natural Areas Association is the leading voice in natural areas management and preservation. The Journal features peer-reviewed original research articles on topics such as: -Applied conservation biology- Ecological restoration- Natural areas management- Ecological assessment and monitoring- Invasive and exotic species management- Habitat protection- Fire ecology. It also includes writing on conservation issues, forums, topic reviews, editorials, state and federal natural area activities and book reviews. In addition, we publish special issues on various topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信