Colleen Kamoroff, Erik Meyer, Caren S. Goldberg, Saramae Parker, Matthew M. Smith, Joshua S. Reece
{"title":"研究红杉和国王峡谷国家公园的水生物种分布:溪流中视觉和环境DNA调查的比较","authors":"Colleen Kamoroff, Erik Meyer, Caren S. Goldberg, Saramae Parker, Matthew M. Smith, Joshua S. Reece","doi":"10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biodiversity monitoring is a difficult and expensive activity that is chronically underfunded. Visual Encounter Surveys (VES) are a common monitoring tool for poikilothermic organisms in streams and rivers, but many species are challenging to detect with this method. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods have been growing in popularity as a supplement or replacement for VES for aquatic species, but they are not yet widely adopted, in part due to perceived costs, a lack of understanding about their efficacy, and a lack of technical expertise. We implemented a paired VES and eDNA survey of 13 species (6 native and 7 invasive) in three rivers within and around Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI). We found that species detection using eDNA methods was consistently higher compared to traditional snorkel VES, and eDNA was an accurate, cost-effective method for detecting biodiversity. Using eDNA and VES techniques, we were able to conduct a survey of aquatic biodiversity in areas within and neighboring the SEKI boundary. Our work highlights the potential for eDNA methods to be used in conjunction with traditional VES to minimize costs and improve capacity for resource management.","PeriodicalId":49780,"journal":{"name":"Natural Areas Journal","volume":" 38","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Aquatic Species Distributions for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks: A Comparison of Visual and Environmental DNA Surveys in Streams\",\"authors\":\"Colleen Kamoroff, Erik Meyer, Caren S. Goldberg, Saramae Parker, Matthew M. Smith, Joshua S. Reece\",\"doi\":\"10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biodiversity monitoring is a difficult and expensive activity that is chronically underfunded. Visual Encounter Surveys (VES) are a common monitoring tool for poikilothermic organisms in streams and rivers, but many species are challenging to detect with this method. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods have been growing in popularity as a supplement or replacement for VES for aquatic species, but they are not yet widely adopted, in part due to perceived costs, a lack of understanding about their efficacy, and a lack of technical expertise. We implemented a paired VES and eDNA survey of 13 species (6 native and 7 invasive) in three rivers within and around Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI). We found that species detection using eDNA methods was consistently higher compared to traditional snorkel VES, and eDNA was an accurate, cost-effective method for detecting biodiversity. Using eDNA and VES techniques, we were able to conduct a survey of aquatic biodiversity in areas within and neighboring the SEKI boundary. Our work highlights the potential for eDNA methods to be used in conjunction with traditional VES to minimize costs and improve capacity for resource management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"volume\":\" 38\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Areas Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Areas Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608-43.4.225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating Aquatic Species Distributions for Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks: A Comparison of Visual and Environmental DNA Surveys in Streams
Biodiversity monitoring is a difficult and expensive activity that is chronically underfunded. Visual Encounter Surveys (VES) are a common monitoring tool for poikilothermic organisms in streams and rivers, but many species are challenging to detect with this method. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods have been growing in popularity as a supplement or replacement for VES for aquatic species, but they are not yet widely adopted, in part due to perceived costs, a lack of understanding about their efficacy, and a lack of technical expertise. We implemented a paired VES and eDNA survey of 13 species (6 native and 7 invasive) in three rivers within and around Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI). We found that species detection using eDNA methods was consistently higher compared to traditional snorkel VES, and eDNA was an accurate, cost-effective method for detecting biodiversity. Using eDNA and VES techniques, we were able to conduct a survey of aquatic biodiversity in areas within and neighboring the SEKI boundary. Our work highlights the potential for eDNA methods to be used in conjunction with traditional VES to minimize costs and improve capacity for resource management.
期刊介绍:
The Natural Areas Journal is the flagship publication of the Natural Areas Association is the leading voice in natural areas management and preservation.
The Journal features peer-reviewed original research articles on topics such as:
-Applied conservation biology-
Ecological restoration-
Natural areas management-
Ecological assessment and monitoring-
Invasive and exotic species management-
Habitat protection-
Fire ecology.
It also includes writing on conservation issues, forums, topic reviews, editorials, state and federal natural area activities and book reviews. In addition, we publish special issues on various topics.