{"title":"制药公司如何滥用脂肪接受度","authors":"Andrea Bombak","doi":"10.1080/09581596.2023.2273201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPharmaceutical companies influence whether we perceive conditions as relevant to the medical sector and in need of pharmaceutical intervention (pharmaceuticalization). Recently, through coordinated media and professional campaigns, pharmaceutical companies are coming to influence our understanding of bodily size. Beyond merely affecting conversations about how weight should be understood and engaged with in healthcare, however, pharmaceutical companies are swaying how society approaches weight stigma. By elevating certain voices, those of organizations and clinicians with whom they partner, and not others, including fat acceptance activists, pharmaceutical companies are having a regressive impact on body acceptance veiled as “obesity” stigma advocacy.KEYWORDS: Obesityweight lossconflicts of intereststigmapharmaceuticalizationmedicalization Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Fat and higher-weight are used throughout this manuscript non-pejoratively as neutral descriptors; obese/obesity (BMI ≥ 30) are presented in quotes to emphasize the contested nature of the pathologization of fatness (Meadows & Daníelsdóttir, Citation2016).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.","PeriodicalId":51469,"journal":{"name":"Critical Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How pharmaceutical companies misappropriate fat acceptance\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Bombak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09581596.2023.2273201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTPharmaceutical companies influence whether we perceive conditions as relevant to the medical sector and in need of pharmaceutical intervention (pharmaceuticalization). Recently, through coordinated media and professional campaigns, pharmaceutical companies are coming to influence our understanding of bodily size. Beyond merely affecting conversations about how weight should be understood and engaged with in healthcare, however, pharmaceutical companies are swaying how society approaches weight stigma. By elevating certain voices, those of organizations and clinicians with whom they partner, and not others, including fat acceptance activists, pharmaceutical companies are having a regressive impact on body acceptance veiled as “obesity” stigma advocacy.KEYWORDS: Obesityweight lossconflicts of intereststigmapharmaceuticalizationmedicalization Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Fat and higher-weight are used throughout this manuscript non-pejoratively as neutral descriptors; obese/obesity (BMI ≥ 30) are presented in quotes to emphasize the contested nature of the pathologization of fatness (Meadows & Daníelsdóttir, Citation2016).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2023.2273201\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2023.2273201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
How pharmaceutical companies misappropriate fat acceptance
ABSTRACTPharmaceutical companies influence whether we perceive conditions as relevant to the medical sector and in need of pharmaceutical intervention (pharmaceuticalization). Recently, through coordinated media and professional campaigns, pharmaceutical companies are coming to influence our understanding of bodily size. Beyond merely affecting conversations about how weight should be understood and engaged with in healthcare, however, pharmaceutical companies are swaying how society approaches weight stigma. By elevating certain voices, those of organizations and clinicians with whom they partner, and not others, including fat acceptance activists, pharmaceutical companies are having a regressive impact on body acceptance veiled as “obesity” stigma advocacy.KEYWORDS: Obesityweight lossconflicts of intereststigmapharmaceuticalizationmedicalization Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Fat and higher-weight are used throughout this manuscript non-pejoratively as neutral descriptors; obese/obesity (BMI ≥ 30) are presented in quotes to emphasize the contested nature of the pathologization of fatness (Meadows & Daníelsdóttir, Citation2016).Additional informationFundingThe author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.
期刊介绍:
Critical Public Health (CPH) is a respected peer-review journal for researchers and practitioners working in public health, health promotion and related fields. It brings together international scholarship to provide critical analyses of theory and practice, reviews of literature and explorations of new ways of working. The journal publishes high quality work that is open and critical in perspective and which reports on current research and debates in the field. CPH encourages an interdisciplinary focus and features innovative analyses. It is committed to exploring and debating issues of equity and social justice; in particular, issues of sexism, racism and other forms of oppression.