Cong Minh Huynh, Tan Loi Nguyen, Thi Huong Tra Lam
{"title":"经合组织国家的财政分权与收入不平等:影子经济重要吗?","authors":"Cong Minh Huynh, Tan Loi Nguyen, Thi Huong Tra Lam","doi":"10.1007/s40822-023-00241-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impacts of fiscal decentralization on income inequality have been debated, especially they can depend on fiscal tools and other factors. This paper explores whether the allocation of government spending and tax revenue at different levels of government truly alleviates income inequality or inadvertently exacerbates it, considering the presence of the shadow economy – which operates outside formal channels. The study focuses on 23 OECD countries over the period 2002–2020 due to the significant surge in fiscal decentralization, and the growing concerns regarding rising income inequality and the shadow economy within OECD countries. Results show that: (i) tax revenue decentralization increases income inequality; (ii) expenditure decentralization significantly reduces income inequality; (iii) income inequality is positively affected by shadow economy; (iv) the shadow economy intensifies the detrimental effect of tax revenue decentralization on income equality, and it weakens the beneficial effect of expenditure decentralization on income equality; (v) the threshold is 18.53%, meaning that expenditure decentralization abates income inequality as long as the shadow economy is below this threshold, but above this level, expenditure decentralization exacerbates income inequality. These findings suggest that tax revenue decentralization may not be the silver bullet for combating income inequality, whereas expenditure decentralization holds promise when the shadow economy is controlled. These insights call for cautious policymaking in the realm of fiscal decentralization, particularly in the context of the shadow economy, to foster a more equitable future.","PeriodicalId":45064,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Economic Review","volume":"58 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiscal decentralization and income inequality in OECD countries: does shadow economy matter?\",\"authors\":\"Cong Minh Huynh, Tan Loi Nguyen, Thi Huong Tra Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40822-023-00241-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The impacts of fiscal decentralization on income inequality have been debated, especially they can depend on fiscal tools and other factors. This paper explores whether the allocation of government spending and tax revenue at different levels of government truly alleviates income inequality or inadvertently exacerbates it, considering the presence of the shadow economy – which operates outside formal channels. The study focuses on 23 OECD countries over the period 2002–2020 due to the significant surge in fiscal decentralization, and the growing concerns regarding rising income inequality and the shadow economy within OECD countries. Results show that: (i) tax revenue decentralization increases income inequality; (ii) expenditure decentralization significantly reduces income inequality; (iii) income inequality is positively affected by shadow economy; (iv) the shadow economy intensifies the detrimental effect of tax revenue decentralization on income equality, and it weakens the beneficial effect of expenditure decentralization on income equality; (v) the threshold is 18.53%, meaning that expenditure decentralization abates income inequality as long as the shadow economy is below this threshold, but above this level, expenditure decentralization exacerbates income inequality. These findings suggest that tax revenue decentralization may not be the silver bullet for combating income inequality, whereas expenditure decentralization holds promise when the shadow economy is controlled. These insights call for cautious policymaking in the realm of fiscal decentralization, particularly in the context of the shadow economy, to foster a more equitable future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"58 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00241-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00241-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fiscal decentralization and income inequality in OECD countries: does shadow economy matter?
The impacts of fiscal decentralization on income inequality have been debated, especially they can depend on fiscal tools and other factors. This paper explores whether the allocation of government spending and tax revenue at different levels of government truly alleviates income inequality or inadvertently exacerbates it, considering the presence of the shadow economy – which operates outside formal channels. The study focuses on 23 OECD countries over the period 2002–2020 due to the significant surge in fiscal decentralization, and the growing concerns regarding rising income inequality and the shadow economy within OECD countries. Results show that: (i) tax revenue decentralization increases income inequality; (ii) expenditure decentralization significantly reduces income inequality; (iii) income inequality is positively affected by shadow economy; (iv) the shadow economy intensifies the detrimental effect of tax revenue decentralization on income equality, and it weakens the beneficial effect of expenditure decentralization on income equality; (v) the threshold is 18.53%, meaning that expenditure decentralization abates income inequality as long as the shadow economy is below this threshold, but above this level, expenditure decentralization exacerbates income inequality. These findings suggest that tax revenue decentralization may not be the silver bullet for combating income inequality, whereas expenditure decentralization holds promise when the shadow economy is controlled. These insights call for cautious policymaking in the realm of fiscal decentralization, particularly in the context of the shadow economy, to foster a more equitable future.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Eurasian Economic Review is to publish peer-reviewed empirical research papers that test, extend, or build theory and contribute to practice. All empirical methods - including, but not limited to, qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, and any combination of methods - are welcome. Empirical, theoretical and methodological articles from all fields of finance and applied macroeconomics are featured in the journal. Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the field are highly encouraged. The journal has a broad scope, addressing such issues as: financial systems and regulation, corporate and start-up finance, macro and sustainable finance, finance and innovation, consumer finance, public policies on financial markets within local, regional, national and international contexts, money and banking, and the interface of labor and financial economics. The macroeconomics coverage includes topics from monetary economics, labor economics, international economics and development economics.
Eurasian Economic Review is published quarterly. To be published in Eurasian Economic Review, a manuscript must make strong empirical and/or theoretical contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to our field. Consequently, preference is given to submissions that test, extend, or build strong theoretical frameworks while empirically examining issues with high importance for theory and practice. Eurasian Economic Review is not tied to any national context. Although it focuses on Europe and Asia, all papers from related fields on any region or country are highly encouraged. Single country studies, cross-country or regional studies can be submitted.