{"title":"人类世的图与场","authors":"Jeffrey Benjamin","doi":"10.1558/jca.25835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following thoughts will inevitably find themselves in the service of a central idea: the creation of a discursive common ground – that is, the production of a set of assumptions, beliefs and common terms that find acceptance and use, and which form the basis for conversation and dialogue. So, in the simple act of gathering a group of essays under the title “Making Ground”, we have created a discursive commons that allows discrete and unique thoughts and ideas to find expression. This notion – the creation of a discursive commons – is the guiding theme of this essay, where it begins and where it will end. It is also very important to note that (although I do not think it is the case in this instance) a discursive commons can be created through evasion as much as through attraction: by advancing or proposing a theme that is somehow repellant to an existing field of discourse, a new common ground can be created. Therefore, the overt rejection of a discursive commons, or the rejection of a conceptual assertion, in many ways serves the same purpose as its acceptance.","PeriodicalId":54020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Archaeology","volume":"45 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Figure and Field in the Anthropocene\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Benjamin\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/jca.25835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following thoughts will inevitably find themselves in the service of a central idea: the creation of a discursive common ground – that is, the production of a set of assumptions, beliefs and common terms that find acceptance and use, and which form the basis for conversation and dialogue. So, in the simple act of gathering a group of essays under the title “Making Ground”, we have created a discursive commons that allows discrete and unique thoughts and ideas to find expression. This notion – the creation of a discursive commons – is the guiding theme of this essay, where it begins and where it will end. It is also very important to note that (although I do not think it is the case in this instance) a discursive commons can be created through evasion as much as through attraction: by advancing or proposing a theme that is somehow repellant to an existing field of discourse, a new common ground can be created. Therefore, the overt rejection of a discursive commons, or the rejection of a conceptual assertion, in many ways serves the same purpose as its acceptance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.25835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.25835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The following thoughts will inevitably find themselves in the service of a central idea: the creation of a discursive common ground – that is, the production of a set of assumptions, beliefs and common terms that find acceptance and use, and which form the basis for conversation and dialogue. So, in the simple act of gathering a group of essays under the title “Making Ground”, we have created a discursive commons that allows discrete and unique thoughts and ideas to find expression. This notion – the creation of a discursive commons – is the guiding theme of this essay, where it begins and where it will end. It is also very important to note that (although I do not think it is the case in this instance) a discursive commons can be created through evasion as much as through attraction: by advancing or proposing a theme that is somehow repellant to an existing field of discourse, a new common ground can be created. Therefore, the overt rejection of a discursive commons, or the rejection of a conceptual assertion, in many ways serves the same purpose as its acceptance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary Archaeology is the first dedicated, international, peer-reviewed journal to explore archaeology’s specific contribution to understanding the present and recent past. It is concerned both with archaeologies of the contemporary world, defined temporally as belonging to the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, as well as with reflections on the socio-political implications of doing archaeology in the contemporary world. In addition to its focus on archaeology, JCA encourages articles from a range of adjacent disciplines which consider recent and contemporary material-cultural entanglements, including anthropology, art history, cultural studies, design studies, heritage studies, history, human geography, media studies, museum studies, psychology, science and technology studies and sociology. Acknowledging the key place which photography and digital media have come to occupy within this emerging subfield, JCA includes a regular photo essay feature and provides space for the publication of interactive, web-only content on its website.