基于物理论证的计算机支持的协同混合学习,提高概念掌握和论证技能

E. Murdani, A. Suhandi, M. Muslim, A. Setiawan, A. Samsudin, B. Costu
{"title":"基于物理论证的计算机支持的协同混合学习,提高概念掌握和论证技能","authors":"E. Murdani, A. Suhandi, M. Muslim, A. Setiawan, A. Samsudin, B. Costu","doi":"10.15294/jpii.v12i2.42457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation of senior high school students in Singkawang City, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. The Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning (PABCSCHL) model in Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) especially on the topic of the forest fire on the peatlands has been developed with good validation categories by three pedagogical validators and three assessment validators and been implemented to 200 students. Their argumentation skill levels are measured based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern. The syntax of the PABCSCHL model is Reading (online), Concept Building, Discussing and Debating (offline), Experiment Designing (online), and Experiment Doing (offline). The core of this model is student collaboration in arguing, debating, and experimenting. From this research, most student solution to anticipate the fire forest on peatlands is burning and waiting until the fire is extinguished perfectly (70 students), monitoring periodically that the fire is completely extinguished (60 students), and limiting the burned area by digging trenches around the site (50 students). Student solutions describe students’ understanding of solving problems posed in group discussion sessions and debates and prove their arguments with experimental data. Before implementing the model, no student has the highest level of argumentation and concept mastery. After that, 23 students have the highest level of concept mastery, and 25 students have the highest level of argumentation. The PABCSCHL model can increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation skills. This model is a new alternative hybrid learning in the post COVID-19 pandemic. Many more SSI can be learning topics to be implemented in this model.","PeriodicalId":37652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning to Increase Concept Mastery and Argumentation Skills\",\"authors\":\"E. Murdani, A. Suhandi, M. Muslim, A. Setiawan, A. Samsudin, B. Costu\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/jpii.v12i2.42457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation of senior high school students in Singkawang City, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. The Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning (PABCSCHL) model in Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) especially on the topic of the forest fire on the peatlands has been developed with good validation categories by three pedagogical validators and three assessment validators and been implemented to 200 students. Their argumentation skill levels are measured based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern. The syntax of the PABCSCHL model is Reading (online), Concept Building, Discussing and Debating (offline), Experiment Designing (online), and Experiment Doing (offline). The core of this model is student collaboration in arguing, debating, and experimenting. From this research, most student solution to anticipate the fire forest on peatlands is burning and waiting until the fire is extinguished perfectly (70 students), monitoring periodically that the fire is completely extinguished (60 students), and limiting the burned area by digging trenches around the site (50 students). Student solutions describe students’ understanding of solving problems posed in group discussion sessions and debates and prove their arguments with experimental data. Before implementing the model, no student has the highest level of argumentation and concept mastery. After that, 23 students have the highest level of concept mastery, and 25 students have the highest level of argumentation. The PABCSCHL model can increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation skills. This model is a new alternative hybrid learning in the post COVID-19 pandemic. Many more SSI can be learning topics to be implemented in this model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i2.42457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i2.42457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在提高印尼西加里曼丹省新卡旺市高中学生的概念掌握和论证水平。社会科学问题(SSI)中基于物理论证的计算机支持协同混合学习(PABCSCHL)模型,特别是泥炭地森林火灾的主题,已由三位教学验证者和三位评估验证者开发出良好的验证类别,并在200名学生中实施。他们的辩论技巧水平是根据图尔敏辩论模式来衡量的。PABCSCHL模型的语法是阅读(在线)、概念构建、讨论和辩论(离线)、实验设计(在线)和实验做(离线)。这种模式的核心是学生在争论、辩论和实验中的合作。从这项研究中,大多数学生预测泥炭地火灾森林的解决方案是燃烧并等待火完全熄灭(70名学生),定期监测火完全熄灭(60名学生),并通过在现场周围挖沟来限制燃烧区域(50名学生)。学生解决方案描述学生对解决小组讨论和辩论中提出的问题的理解,并用实验数据证明他们的论点。在实施该模式之前,没有学生的论证能力和概念掌握能力达到最高水平。在此之后,23名学生的概念掌握水平最高,25名学生的论证水平最高。PABCSCHL模式可以提高学生的概念掌握水平和论证能力。该模型是后COVID-19大流行时期一种新的替代混合学习模式。更多的SSI可以是要在这个模型中实现的学习主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning to Increase Concept Mastery and Argumentation Skills
This study aims to increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation of senior high school students in Singkawang City, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. The Physics Argumentation-Based Computer-Supported Collaborative Hybrid Learning (PABCSCHL) model in Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) especially on the topic of the forest fire on the peatlands has been developed with good validation categories by three pedagogical validators and three assessment validators and been implemented to 200 students. Their argumentation skill levels are measured based on Toulmin Argumentation Pattern. The syntax of the PABCSCHL model is Reading (online), Concept Building, Discussing and Debating (offline), Experiment Designing (online), and Experiment Doing (offline). The core of this model is student collaboration in arguing, debating, and experimenting. From this research, most student solution to anticipate the fire forest on peatlands is burning and waiting until the fire is extinguished perfectly (70 students), monitoring periodically that the fire is completely extinguished (60 students), and limiting the burned area by digging trenches around the site (50 students). Student solutions describe students’ understanding of solving problems posed in group discussion sessions and debates and prove their arguments with experimental data. Before implementing the model, no student has the highest level of argumentation and concept mastery. After that, 23 students have the highest level of concept mastery, and 25 students have the highest level of argumentation. The PABCSCHL model can increase the level of concept mastery and argumentation skills. This model is a new alternative hybrid learning in the post COVID-19 pandemic. Many more SSI can be learning topics to be implemented in this model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy, and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. Moreover, this journal also covers the issues concerned with environmental education & environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信