比利时上诉法院对列支敦士登基金会遗产分配的遗产税处理作出裁决

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
Niels Appermont
{"title":"比利时上诉法院对列支敦士登基金会遗产分配的遗产税处理作出裁决","authors":"Niels Appermont","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In a judgment of 5 April 2022, the Court of Appeal of Ghent ruled on a case regarding the qualification of a distribution by Liechtenstein Stiftung under Belgian inheritance taxation. While the constitution of and the transfer of assets to a private foundation, or even a distribution by a private foundation after the death of the founder normally does not trigger Belgian inheritance taxation, the Court ultimately ruled that the distributions should be subject to inheritance taxation, based on the (perceived) existence of an ‘agreement’ between the wife of the founder, who was designated as the ‘first beneficiary’ and the second beneficiaries. This judgment raises a number of questions regarding the correct interpretation of the relevant Belgian tax provisions and the correct application of the applicable Liechtenstein legislation. This article provides an in-depth assessment of this judgment and serves as a cautionary tale for any private foundation which has a founder and/or beneficiaries resident in Belgium.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belgian court of appeal rules on inheritance tax treatment of a distribution by a Liechtenstein foundation\",\"authors\":\"Niels Appermont\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttad047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In a judgment of 5 April 2022, the Court of Appeal of Ghent ruled on a case regarding the qualification of a distribution by Liechtenstein Stiftung under Belgian inheritance taxation. While the constitution of and the transfer of assets to a private foundation, or even a distribution by a private foundation after the death of the founder normally does not trigger Belgian inheritance taxation, the Court ultimately ruled that the distributions should be subject to inheritance taxation, based on the (perceived) existence of an ‘agreement’ between the wife of the founder, who was designated as the ‘first beneficiary’ and the second beneficiaries. This judgment raises a number of questions regarding the correct interpretation of the relevant Belgian tax provisions and the correct application of the applicable Liechtenstein legislation. This article provides an in-depth assessment of this judgment and serves as a cautionary tale for any private foundation which has a founder and/or beneficiaries resident in Belgium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttad047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2022年4月5日的判决中,根特上诉法院就列支敦士登基金会根据比利时遗产税分配资格的案件作出裁决。虽然设立和向私人基金会转移资产,甚至在创始人去世后由私人基金会进行分配,通常不会触发比利时的遗产税,但法院最终裁定,根据创始人妻子(被指定为“第一受益人”和“第二受益人”)之间存在的“协议”,分配应该受到遗产税的约束。这一判决提出了一些关于正确解释有关比利时税收规定和正确适用适用的列支敦士登立法的问题。本文对这一判断进行了深入的评估,并为任何创始人和/或受益人居住在比利时的私人基金会提供了一个警世故事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Belgian court of appeal rules on inheritance tax treatment of a distribution by a Liechtenstein foundation
Abstract In a judgment of 5 April 2022, the Court of Appeal of Ghent ruled on a case regarding the qualification of a distribution by Liechtenstein Stiftung under Belgian inheritance taxation. While the constitution of and the transfer of assets to a private foundation, or even a distribution by a private foundation after the death of the founder normally does not trigger Belgian inheritance taxation, the Court ultimately ruled that the distributions should be subject to inheritance taxation, based on the (perceived) existence of an ‘agreement’ between the wife of the founder, who was designated as the ‘first beneficiary’ and the second beneficiaries. This judgment raises a number of questions regarding the correct interpretation of the relevant Belgian tax provisions and the correct application of the applicable Liechtenstein legislation. This article provides an in-depth assessment of this judgment and serves as a cautionary tale for any private foundation which has a founder and/or beneficiaries resident in Belgium.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信