比才《卡门》失败神话的创作。以下是1875-1883年法国印刷机的资料

Anna V. Bulycheva, Elena A. Arutyunova
{"title":"比才《卡门》失败神话的创作。以下是1875-1883年法国印刷机的资料","authors":"Anna V. Bulycheva, Elena A. Arutyunova","doi":"10.56620/2587-9731-2023-3-040-062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stage fate of Georges Bizet’s last opera Carmen has become surrounded by legends for a long time. For a long period of time in musicology in Russia and in other countries it was considered that the composition was received rather coldly by the critics, whereas the world premiere, which took place on March 3, 1875 resulted in a failure. An analysis of the articles published in the periodicals of 1875 reveals the erroneousness of this fact: the reviews of the first production of Carmen were almost unanimously positive, and not a single harshly negative review was published. In order to understand the reason for the origin of the myth about the opera’s failure, it is worth examining the critical articles published from the moment of its first production up to the revival of Carmen at the Opéra-comique in 1883. The nineteenth century became a time of flourishing of the French press. In Paris alone there were over a hundred newspapers and illustrated magazines, around sixty of which responded to the premiere of Carmen. Among the authors of the reviews there were both significant musicologists, composers and literati, as well as journalists whose names have remained unknown. Virtually every critical article examines important questions of the libretto, the score, the performance and the formatting. It follows from the materials of the press that after the first production the main criticism was expressed in regard to the chosen plotline and the libretto, while the music received quite favorable estimation. After Bizet’s death in June 1875, the opera remained under the steadfast attention of the public, continued to receive exuberant reviews and was withdrawn from the repertoire of the Opéra-comique after two successful seasons due to the requirement of renewing the repertoire. In 1883 Carmen returned to the Paris scene as a masterpiece acknowledged throughout the world, and it was particularly at the moment of the opera’s revival the myth began to form of the failure of its premiere. This legend, created by the directorate of the Opéra-comique for the sake of attracting the audiences’ attention, was quickly disseminated and fixated itself into the consciousness of the public and the critics. Not least important was the role played in its popularization by the effect of substitution of reminiscences and the image formed around Bizet of a romantic artist and an unrecognized genius, which predominated in the 19th century.","PeriodicalId":211901,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Musicology","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Creation of the Myth about the Failure of Georges Bizet’s Carmen. Following the Materials of the French Press of the Years 1875–1883\",\"authors\":\"Anna V. Bulycheva, Elena A. Arutyunova\",\"doi\":\"10.56620/2587-9731-2023-3-040-062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The stage fate of Georges Bizet’s last opera Carmen has become surrounded by legends for a long time. For a long period of time in musicology in Russia and in other countries it was considered that the composition was received rather coldly by the critics, whereas the world premiere, which took place on March 3, 1875 resulted in a failure. An analysis of the articles published in the periodicals of 1875 reveals the erroneousness of this fact: the reviews of the first production of Carmen were almost unanimously positive, and not a single harshly negative review was published. In order to understand the reason for the origin of the myth about the opera’s failure, it is worth examining the critical articles published from the moment of its first production up to the revival of Carmen at the Opéra-comique in 1883. The nineteenth century became a time of flourishing of the French press. In Paris alone there were over a hundred newspapers and illustrated magazines, around sixty of which responded to the premiere of Carmen. Among the authors of the reviews there were both significant musicologists, composers and literati, as well as journalists whose names have remained unknown. Virtually every critical article examines important questions of the libretto, the score, the performance and the formatting. It follows from the materials of the press that after the first production the main criticism was expressed in regard to the chosen plotline and the libretto, while the music received quite favorable estimation. After Bizet’s death in June 1875, the opera remained under the steadfast attention of the public, continued to receive exuberant reviews and was withdrawn from the repertoire of the Opéra-comique after two successful seasons due to the requirement of renewing the repertoire. In 1883 Carmen returned to the Paris scene as a masterpiece acknowledged throughout the world, and it was particularly at the moment of the opera’s revival the myth began to form of the failure of its premiere. This legend, created by the directorate of the Opéra-comique for the sake of attracting the audiences’ attention, was quickly disseminated and fixated itself into the consciousness of the public and the critics. Not least important was the role played in its popularization by the effect of substitution of reminiscences and the image formed around Bizet of a romantic artist and an unrecognized genius, which predominated in the 19th century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Musicology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Musicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56620/2587-9731-2023-3-040-062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Musicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56620/2587-9731-2023-3-040-062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比才最后一部歌剧《卡门》的舞台命运长期以来一直充满着传奇色彩。在很长一段时间里,俄罗斯和其他国家的音乐学认为,评论界对这部作品的反应相当冷淡,而1875年3月3日举行的世界首演则以失败告终。对1875年发表在期刊上的文章的分析揭示了这一事实的错误:对卡门第一部作品的评论几乎一致是正面的,没有一篇严厉的负面评论发表。为了理解关于歌剧失败的神话起源的原因,有必要研究一下从它第一次制作到1883年卡门在opsamra -comique重新上演的批评性文章。19世纪成为法国报刊的繁荣时期。仅在巴黎就有一百多家报纸和插图杂志,其中大约六十家对《卡门》的首演作出了回应。在这些评论的作者中,既有重要的音乐学家、作曲家和文人,也有名字不为人知的记者。事实上,每一篇评论文章都考察了剧本、配乐、表演和格式等重要问题。从报纸上的材料可以看出,在第一部作品之后,主要的批评是关于选择的情节和歌词,而音乐则得到了相当好的评价。比才于1875年6月去世后,这部歌剧仍然受到公众的坚定关注,继续受到热烈的评论,并在两个成功的演出季后,由于更新剧目的要求,从opsamra -comique的保留剧目中撤出。1883年,《卡门》作为一部举世公认的杰作重返巴黎舞台,尤其是在这部歌剧复兴的那一刻,首演失败的神话开始形成。这个由喜剧总局为了吸引观众的注意而编造的传说迅速传播开来,并在公众和评论家的意识中固定下来。同样重要的是,在19世纪占主导地位的比才周围形成的浪漫主义艺术家和不被认可的天才的形象,以及对回忆的替代效应在其普及中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Creation of the Myth about the Failure of Georges Bizet’s Carmen. Following the Materials of the French Press of the Years 1875–1883
The stage fate of Georges Bizet’s last opera Carmen has become surrounded by legends for a long time. For a long period of time in musicology in Russia and in other countries it was considered that the composition was received rather coldly by the critics, whereas the world premiere, which took place on March 3, 1875 resulted in a failure. An analysis of the articles published in the periodicals of 1875 reveals the erroneousness of this fact: the reviews of the first production of Carmen were almost unanimously positive, and not a single harshly negative review was published. In order to understand the reason for the origin of the myth about the opera’s failure, it is worth examining the critical articles published from the moment of its first production up to the revival of Carmen at the Opéra-comique in 1883. The nineteenth century became a time of flourishing of the French press. In Paris alone there were over a hundred newspapers and illustrated magazines, around sixty of which responded to the premiere of Carmen. Among the authors of the reviews there were both significant musicologists, composers and literati, as well as journalists whose names have remained unknown. Virtually every critical article examines important questions of the libretto, the score, the performance and the formatting. It follows from the materials of the press that after the first production the main criticism was expressed in regard to the chosen plotline and the libretto, while the music received quite favorable estimation. After Bizet’s death in June 1875, the opera remained under the steadfast attention of the public, continued to receive exuberant reviews and was withdrawn from the repertoire of the Opéra-comique after two successful seasons due to the requirement of renewing the repertoire. In 1883 Carmen returned to the Paris scene as a masterpiece acknowledged throughout the world, and it was particularly at the moment of the opera’s revival the myth began to form of the failure of its premiere. This legend, created by the directorate of the Opéra-comique for the sake of attracting the audiences’ attention, was quickly disseminated and fixated itself into the consciousness of the public and the critics. Not least important was the role played in its popularization by the effect of substitution of reminiscences and the image formed around Bizet of a romantic artist and an unrecognized genius, which predominated in the 19th century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信