象征制度的法律与限制:胡塞尔与皮尔斯和弗雷格的较量

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Philosophie Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.3917/philo.159.0093
Dominique Pradelle
{"title":"象征制度的法律与限制:胡塞尔与皮尔斯和弗雷格的较量","authors":"Dominique Pradelle","doi":"10.3917/philo.159.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, Dominique Pradelle focuses on the act of symbolic institution that establishes the alphabet of signs: Is it a matter of the free establishment of an operative meaning or is it governed by necessary laws? In the latter case, where did they come from? The author shows that these laws come from the upper layers of meaning and ideal objects—which has the essential consequence, in transcendental phenomenology, of removing the Husserlian concept of transcendental constitution from the paradigm of a free production of the meaning and of the objects.","PeriodicalId":38393,"journal":{"name":"Philosophie","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lois et limites de l’institution symbolique : Husserl confronté à Peirce et Frege\",\"authors\":\"Dominique Pradelle\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/philo.159.0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, Dominique Pradelle focuses on the act of symbolic institution that establishes the alphabet of signs: Is it a matter of the free establishment of an operative meaning or is it governed by necessary laws? In the latter case, where did they come from? The author shows that these laws come from the upper layers of meaning and ideal objects—which has the essential consequence, in transcendental phenomenology, of removing the Husserlian concept of transcendental constitution from the paradigm of a free production of the meaning and of the objects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophie\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/philo.159.0093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/philo.159.0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,Dominique Pradelle关注的是符号制度建立符号字母表的行为:这是一个自由建立操作意义的问题,还是由必要的法律支配的问题?在后一种情况下,它们从何而来?作者指出,这些规律来自意义和理想客体的上层,这在先验现象学中具有根本性的后果,即将胡塞尔的先验构成概念从意义和客体的自由生产范式中移除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lois et limites de l’institution symbolique : Husserl confronté à Peirce et Frege
In this paper, Dominique Pradelle focuses on the act of symbolic institution that establishes the alphabet of signs: Is it a matter of the free establishment of an operative meaning or is it governed by necessary laws? In the latter case, where did they come from? The author shows that these laws come from the upper layers of meaning and ideal objects—which has the essential consequence, in transcendental phenomenology, of removing the Husserlian concept of transcendental constitution from the paradigm of a free production of the meaning and of the objects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophie
Philosophie Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信