中国贸易冲击与欧盟就业

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Mi Dai, Qingyuan Du, Yalin Liu, Jianwei Xu
{"title":"中国贸易冲击与欧盟就业","authors":"Mi Dai, Qingyuan Du, Yalin Liu, Jianwei Xu","doi":"10.1080/09638199.2023.2260010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes the effect of trade with China on the European Union's industrial and regional employment. Built on a canonical multi-country Ricardian model, we identify and estimate the employment reallocation effect across fifteen EU countries with specific discussions on three channels: import penetration, direct export, and third-market competition vis-à-vis China. Data suggest that the adverse effects stemming from the import penetration and the third-market competition quantitatively dominate the positive effect from the export channel for the effect on the EU. In particular, the third-market competition channel is a key channel for understanding the impact of China trade shock on the EU market, accounting for about 46% and 36% of the total negative effect at the industry level and region level, respectively. Moreover, the third-market competition channel particularly influenced the relative employment growth of the worst-affected industries in the European market.KEYWORDS: China shockemploymentthird-market competitionJEL CLASSIFICATIONS: E24F14F16J23L60O47R12R23 AcknowledgmentsWe thank Silvio Contessi, Alberto Pozzolo, Chuliang Luo for their help during the study of the research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This index is the simple average of the intra-EU trade from 2002 to 2007 from the Eurostat database (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database).2 We do not use the initial employment share in 1996 to compute the three measures in the baseline estimations in order to include more countries in the sample. In one robustness check, we adopt the employment share in 1996 to compute the regional average import penetration, direct export and third-market competition measures, the sample reduces to five countries, however, our baseline estimation result still holds.3 Data source: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=STAN08BIS#.4 Data source: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.Additional informationFundingThe authors are funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 7167302, 71973013, 72303260, 72373012]. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of their organizations.","PeriodicalId":51656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The China trade shock and the European Union's employment\",\"authors\":\"Mi Dai, Qingyuan Du, Yalin Liu, Jianwei Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09638199.2023.2260010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes the effect of trade with China on the European Union's industrial and regional employment. Built on a canonical multi-country Ricardian model, we identify and estimate the employment reallocation effect across fifteen EU countries with specific discussions on three channels: import penetration, direct export, and third-market competition vis-à-vis China. Data suggest that the adverse effects stemming from the import penetration and the third-market competition quantitatively dominate the positive effect from the export channel for the effect on the EU. In particular, the third-market competition channel is a key channel for understanding the impact of China trade shock on the EU market, accounting for about 46% and 36% of the total negative effect at the industry level and region level, respectively. Moreover, the third-market competition channel particularly influenced the relative employment growth of the worst-affected industries in the European market.KEYWORDS: China shockemploymentthird-market competitionJEL CLASSIFICATIONS: E24F14F16J23L60O47R12R23 AcknowledgmentsWe thank Silvio Contessi, Alberto Pozzolo, Chuliang Luo for their help during the study of the research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This index is the simple average of the intra-EU trade from 2002 to 2007 from the Eurostat database (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database).2 We do not use the initial employment share in 1996 to compute the three measures in the baseline estimations in order to include more countries in the sample. In one robustness check, we adopt the employment share in 1996 to compute the regional average import penetration, direct export and third-market competition measures, the sample reduces to five countries, however, our baseline estimation result still holds.3 Data source: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=STAN08BIS#.4 Data source: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.Additional informationFundingThe authors are funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 7167302, 71973013, 72303260, 72373012]. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of their organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2260010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Trade & Economic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2023.2260010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文分析了中欧贸易对欧盟产业和区域就业的影响。在一个典型的跨国李嘉图模型的基础上,我们确定并估计了15个欧盟国家的就业再分配效应,具体讨论了三个渠道:进口渗透、直接出口和与-à-vis中国的第三方市场竞争。数据表明,进口渗透和第三方市场竞争带来的负面影响在数量上超过了出口渠道对欧盟的正面影响。其中,第三市场竞争渠道是理解中国贸易冲击对欧盟市场影响的关键渠道,在行业层面和区域层面分别约占总负面影响的46%和36%。此外,第三市场竞争渠道尤其影响了欧洲市场受影响最严重行业的相对就业增长。关键词:中国冲击就业第三市场竞争jel分类:E24F14F16J23L60O47R12R23致谢感谢Silvio Contessi, Alberto Pozzolo, Chuliang Luo在研究过程中的帮助。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1本指数是欧盟统计局数据库(https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database).2) 2002年至2007年欧盟内部贸易的简单平均值我们没有使用1996年的初始就业份额来计算基线估计中的三个措施,以便将更多的国家纳入样本。在一次稳健性检验中,我们采用1996年的就业份额来计算区域平均进口渗透率、直接出口和第三市场竞争措施,样本减少到五个国家,但我们的基线估计结果仍然成立数据来源:http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=STAN08BIS#.4数据来源:http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.Additional基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上基金[资助号:7167302,71973013,72303260,72373012]。本文中表达的观点是作者的观点,并不一定反映其组织的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The China trade shock and the European Union's employment
ABSTRACTThis paper analyzes the effect of trade with China on the European Union's industrial and regional employment. Built on a canonical multi-country Ricardian model, we identify and estimate the employment reallocation effect across fifteen EU countries with specific discussions on three channels: import penetration, direct export, and third-market competition vis-à-vis China. Data suggest that the adverse effects stemming from the import penetration and the third-market competition quantitatively dominate the positive effect from the export channel for the effect on the EU. In particular, the third-market competition channel is a key channel for understanding the impact of China trade shock on the EU market, accounting for about 46% and 36% of the total negative effect at the industry level and region level, respectively. Moreover, the third-market competition channel particularly influenced the relative employment growth of the worst-affected industries in the European market.KEYWORDS: China shockemploymentthird-market competitionJEL CLASSIFICATIONS: E24F14F16J23L60O47R12R23 AcknowledgmentsWe thank Silvio Contessi, Alberto Pozzolo, Chuliang Luo for their help during the study of the research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This index is the simple average of the intra-EU trade from 2002 to 2007 from the Eurostat database (https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database).2 We do not use the initial employment share in 1996 to compute the three measures in the baseline estimations in order to include more countries in the sample. In one robustness check, we adopt the employment share in 1996 to compute the regional average import penetration, direct export and third-market competition measures, the sample reduces to five countries, however, our baseline estimation result still holds.3 Data source: http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=STAN08BIS#.4 Data source: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.Additional informationFundingThe authors are funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 7167302, 71973013, 72303260, 72373012]. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of their organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development ( JITED) focuses on international economics, economic development, and the interface between trade and development. The links between trade and development economics are critical at a time when fluctuating commodity prices, ongoing production fragmentation, and trade liberalisation can radically affect the economies of advanced and developing countries. Our aim is to keep in touch with the latest developments in research as well as setting the agenda for future analysis. Publication of high quality articles covering; theoretical and applied issues in international and development economics; econometric applications of trade and/or development issues based on sound theoretical economic models or testing fundamental economic hypotheses; models of structural change; trade and development issues of economies in Eastern Europe, Asia and the Pacific area; papers on specific topics which are policy-relevant; review articles on important branches of the literature including controversial and innovative ideas are also welcome. JITED is designed to meet the needs of international and development economists, economic historians, applied economists, and policy makers. The international experts who make up the journal’s Editorial Board encourage contributions from economists world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信