我们的小镇,阿瓦达艺术与人文中心,阿瓦达,科罗拉多州

Brenton Kyle
{"title":"我们的小镇,阿瓦达艺术与人文中心,阿瓦达,科罗拉多州","authors":"Brenton Kyle","doi":"10.5325/thorntonwilderj.4.1.0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his program note to the 2023 production of Our Town at the Arvada Center for the Arts and Humanities, the Center’s President and CEO Phillip Sneed suggests that the play’s central preoccupation is “what it means to be part of a community.” He sees this reflected both in the obvious sense, in that the play is an exploration of a particular community over the course of—and just after—a brief lifetime. But it is also true in a more subtle sense, as arts organizations such as the Arvada Center emerge slowly from the COVID-19 pandemic and embark on the effort to rebuild the communities that sustain them. Sneed (and Arvada Center artistic director Lynne Collins) picked Our Town as a vehicle for reigniting that spark of community, inviting audience members to once again “join with others in the communal experience of watching live theatre.”Director Geoffrey Kent—who also plays the Stage Manager—and his artistic team make several significant choices to reinforce both aspects of this theme of community (Kate Gleason served as assistant director). First, they have chosen to heighten the theatricality of an already highly theatrical work, thus doubling down on the type of experience that can only be had live. And second, their production foregrounds the way in which both the characters and the audience are members of the community of Grover’s Corners. Most of these choices succeed and combine to form a spare and lyrical, yet powerfully theatrical, production of Wilder’s most essential play.From the start, Kent and his team emphasized that this production would be a work of theater. The Black Box Theatre at the Arvada Center is a 200-seat space in the round. At the outset of the evening, rather than the Stage Manager entering onto a bare stage and setting the scene as in Wilder’s stage directions, this production began with the actors mingling among the audience as they entered. As curtain time approached, an actual stage manager (the stage manager was Christine Moore and the assistant stage manager was Melissa J. Michelson) wandered through, announcing five minutes to the actors, who gave back a “thank you, five.” There was no scenery—just a small electric organ next to one of the voms and a ghost light in the center of the stage (the set designer was Brian Mallgrave). The entire auditorium—stage and house—was brightly and generally lit (lighting design was by Jon Dunkle).As curtain time arrived, the cast gathered center stage in a circle around the ghost light to go through an abbreviated physical and vocal warm-up (Fig. 1). After a few minutes, they began singing Our Town’s signature hymn—“Blest Be the Tie that Binds”—on a communal “ooh” rather than singing the words (Emily Van Fleet, also playing Mrs. Gibbs, was musical director). When the hymn was finished, the Stage Manager leaped into action, ascending the three or four steps into one of the voms, beginning his opening monologue. As he discussed the impending dawn, he walked back down into the center of the circle. Telling the audience, “The morning star always gets wonderful bright the minute before it has to go,—doesn’t it?” (Collected Plays 149), he flipped the switch to turn off the ghost light, and the production began in earnest.Once the residents of Grover’s Corners began their day, another theatricalized aspect of the production revealed itself. With a few spare exceptions, the production utilized no props; instead, the actors mimed all of their stage business (the mime choreographer—also playing Mr. Webb—was Matt Zambrano). For certain pieces of business, offstage but still visible actors provided sound effects timed to the miming: when Mrs. Gibbs helped Mrs. Webb with her beans in Act 1, the actors mimed snapping beans and their compatriots offstage snapped in time to the miming. When Joe Crowell threw newspapers, company members slapped rolled-up scripts into their palms, so the audience could “hear” the papers landing on front stoops, and when the Stage Manager (as Mr. Morgan) made ice cream sodas for Emily and George in Act 2, an offstage actor vocalized fizzing noises as the Stage Manager pulled the tap of the soda fountain. The bits of mime that had accompanying sound effects were more noticeable, but ultimately more effective than the garden-variety miming of stage business (opening cabinets, pouring coffee, etc.). Some performers were better at the mime than others—Zambrano was unsurprisingly a standout—but it was a welcome reminder of the power and versatility of live theater.The minimalism in the props carried through to the rest of the set as well. Two small tables and four chairs formed the entirety of the Webb and Gibbs homes in Acts 1 and 2. Two benches did duty as the seating in the respective mothers’ gardens. Mr. Morgan’s soda counter was a long plank across the backs of two chairs. Professor Willard’s disquisition on the antediluvian history of Grover’s Corners was delivered with the aid of an artist’s easel with nothing on it. And when George and Emily discussed their math homework from their respective rooms, the actors stood on chairs in opposite-corner elevated voms. (Ironically, while the production eschewed the typical ladders for George and Emily’s windows, the production poster features the silhouette of a young woman standing on a ladder in front of a full moon, which speaks to the iconic power of Wilder’s image.)The production’s heightened theatricality emphasized its chosen theme of community. From the very first scene, the production physically demonstrated how intimately the residents of Grover’s Corners are involved in one another’s lives. While Wilder calls for the Webb and Gibbs breakfast tables to occupy the down-left and down-right corners of a proscenium stage, respectively, with the gardens facing each other toward center, Kent’s production placed the two breakfast tables literally side by side, center stage, separated by at most two inches. This meant that, for the intercut breakfast scene, it appeared that the two families sat at one large table together, rather than in separate houses—a foreshadowing of the literal joining of the families via Emily and George’s wedding in Act 2 (Fig. 2).The most interesting way in which the production emphasized community was in its attempts to make the audience feel like a part of the community of Grover’s Corners. This was most apparent in the production’s lighting design—or lack thereof. As Kent wrote in his director’s note, the production had “blessed few light cues,” and his team chose to keep the house lights up throughout the play to encourage the audience “to feel as though you are also a resident of our town because we all are.” Although the level of ambient light varied throughout the performance—the nighttime sequence of Act 1 and the entirety of Act 3 were noticeably dimmer than the rest—the house was lit throughout at just below the level of the stage. When the Stage Manager handed random audience members questions written on cards to ask Editor Webb in Act 1, it was not startling or surprising, as the audience already felt like members of the community.The costume design (by Meghan Anderson Doyle) further emphasized the connection between the audience and the actors. While there was a general early twentieth-century feel to the dresses and suits, the costumes strove for evocation rather than technical accuracy, and the simple lines downplayed the extent to which this was meant to seem like a “period” piece. And no effort was made to place the Stage Manager in a historically accurate period: Kent’s untucked white button-down shirt, jeans off the rack, glasses on a lanyard around his neck, long hair tied in a bun, and close-cropped beard would be more at home in a coffee shop in 2023 than in Mr. Morgan’s soda fountain in 1901.The casting of the production also showed an effort to reflect the community of Arvada and greater Denver. Mrs. Gibbs (Emily Van Fleet) and Mrs. Webb (Diana Dresser) were both played by white actors. Dr. Gibbs (Lavour Addison) was played by a Black actor, and for George (Teej Morgan-Arzola) the team cast an actor who appeared to be of blended heritage. Editor Webb (Matt Zambrano) was played by an actor of Latin descent, and Emily (Claylish Coldiron) also seemed a member of that community. These casting choices further closed the distance between Wilder’s world and ours, and they worked well.The performances were, on the whole, very strong. As the Stage Manager, Kent conveyed a warm, wry sensibility and visibly enjoyed being our guide through Grover’s Corners and Emily’s life. Particular standouts were the Gibbs and Webb parents, all four of whom found a loving if slightly world-weary gear that conveyed great caring, but also a wistful awareness that their children would soon grow up and leave them. All four parents were also up to the challenge of carrying most of the more comedic bits of the text; Zambrano’s delivery of Mr. Webb’s father’s advice to George on his wedding day in Act 2 was a particular standout. As Emily, Coldiron shifted adeptly between young girl and young woman, demonstrating a keen intelligence and steel as well as a deep reservoir of love for her family and for George. As George, Morgan-Arzola had a boundless energy and excitement for the future. The remainder of the company (Samantha Piel, Archer Rosenkrantz, Tresha Farris, Kate Gleason, Frank Oden, and Josh Robinson) ably filled out the world of Grover’s Corners, rising eagerly to the challenge, whether it was singing in the choir, making the offstage sound of a horse neighing, or appearing as a solemn mourner at Emily’s funeral. Kent’s direction focused on moving quickly and nimbly through the text, ensuring that the production never dragged.In Act 3, the staging worked to pull the audience fully into the world of the cemetery. While Wilder calls for the dead characters to be seated in three rows of chairs together right of center facing downstage, Kent’s production situated the primary four dead—Mrs. Gibbs, Mrs. Soames, Mr. Stimson, and Wally Webb—in chairs next to the front row of each of the four audience seating banks, facing in toward the stage. Then, as Emily was brought in by a parade of umbrella-bearing mourners, she ultimately sat down in a chair dead center. No audience member could effectively see all four dead characters, so as the dead spoke to Emily, it was almost as if we, too, were among the dead greeting our latest companion. Act 3 is the most abstract section of the play, and staging it in this way enhanced the disconnection between audience and narrative that is inherent in Wilder’s text. It was an effective choice.After Emily traveled back to her birthday and returned to the cemetery, the Stage Manager appeared directly upstage of her during her final colloquy with the dead, rolling the ghost light—idle next to the organ throughout the evening, but now lit once more—along with him. As he sent the audience off with a friendly, “Good night” (Collected Plays 209), he flipped off the ghost light, and we were plunged into darkness for the first time since the play began. In that moment, the heightened theatricality merged with the creative team’s work to build a community, and served as an emphatic conclusion to an excellent production.","PeriodicalId":478170,"journal":{"name":"Thornton Wilder journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Our Town</i>, Arvada Center for the Arts and Humanities, Arvada, Colorado\",\"authors\":\"Brenton Kyle\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/thorntonwilderj.4.1.0123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his program note to the 2023 production of Our Town at the Arvada Center for the Arts and Humanities, the Center’s President and CEO Phillip Sneed suggests that the play’s central preoccupation is “what it means to be part of a community.” He sees this reflected both in the obvious sense, in that the play is an exploration of a particular community over the course of—and just after—a brief lifetime. But it is also true in a more subtle sense, as arts organizations such as the Arvada Center emerge slowly from the COVID-19 pandemic and embark on the effort to rebuild the communities that sustain them. Sneed (and Arvada Center artistic director Lynne Collins) picked Our Town as a vehicle for reigniting that spark of community, inviting audience members to once again “join with others in the communal experience of watching live theatre.”Director Geoffrey Kent—who also plays the Stage Manager—and his artistic team make several significant choices to reinforce both aspects of this theme of community (Kate Gleason served as assistant director). First, they have chosen to heighten the theatricality of an already highly theatrical work, thus doubling down on the type of experience that can only be had live. And second, their production foregrounds the way in which both the characters and the audience are members of the community of Grover’s Corners. Most of these choices succeed and combine to form a spare and lyrical, yet powerfully theatrical, production of Wilder’s most essential play.From the start, Kent and his team emphasized that this production would be a work of theater. The Black Box Theatre at the Arvada Center is a 200-seat space in the round. At the outset of the evening, rather than the Stage Manager entering onto a bare stage and setting the scene as in Wilder’s stage directions, this production began with the actors mingling among the audience as they entered. As curtain time approached, an actual stage manager (the stage manager was Christine Moore and the assistant stage manager was Melissa J. Michelson) wandered through, announcing five minutes to the actors, who gave back a “thank you, five.” There was no scenery—just a small electric organ next to one of the voms and a ghost light in the center of the stage (the set designer was Brian Mallgrave). The entire auditorium—stage and house—was brightly and generally lit (lighting design was by Jon Dunkle).As curtain time arrived, the cast gathered center stage in a circle around the ghost light to go through an abbreviated physical and vocal warm-up (Fig. 1). After a few minutes, they began singing Our Town’s signature hymn—“Blest Be the Tie that Binds”—on a communal “ooh” rather than singing the words (Emily Van Fleet, also playing Mrs. Gibbs, was musical director). When the hymn was finished, the Stage Manager leaped into action, ascending the three or four steps into one of the voms, beginning his opening monologue. As he discussed the impending dawn, he walked back down into the center of the circle. Telling the audience, “The morning star always gets wonderful bright the minute before it has to go,—doesn’t it?” (Collected Plays 149), he flipped the switch to turn off the ghost light, and the production began in earnest.Once the residents of Grover’s Corners began their day, another theatricalized aspect of the production revealed itself. With a few spare exceptions, the production utilized no props; instead, the actors mimed all of their stage business (the mime choreographer—also playing Mr. Webb—was Matt Zambrano). For certain pieces of business, offstage but still visible actors provided sound effects timed to the miming: when Mrs. Gibbs helped Mrs. Webb with her beans in Act 1, the actors mimed snapping beans and their compatriots offstage snapped in time to the miming. When Joe Crowell threw newspapers, company members slapped rolled-up scripts into their palms, so the audience could “hear” the papers landing on front stoops, and when the Stage Manager (as Mr. Morgan) made ice cream sodas for Emily and George in Act 2, an offstage actor vocalized fizzing noises as the Stage Manager pulled the tap of the soda fountain. The bits of mime that had accompanying sound effects were more noticeable, but ultimately more effective than the garden-variety miming of stage business (opening cabinets, pouring coffee, etc.). Some performers were better at the mime than others—Zambrano was unsurprisingly a standout—but it was a welcome reminder of the power and versatility of live theater.The minimalism in the props carried through to the rest of the set as well. Two small tables and four chairs formed the entirety of the Webb and Gibbs homes in Acts 1 and 2. Two benches did duty as the seating in the respective mothers’ gardens. Mr. Morgan’s soda counter was a long plank across the backs of two chairs. Professor Willard’s disquisition on the antediluvian history of Grover’s Corners was delivered with the aid of an artist’s easel with nothing on it. And when George and Emily discussed their math homework from their respective rooms, the actors stood on chairs in opposite-corner elevated voms. (Ironically, while the production eschewed the typical ladders for George and Emily’s windows, the production poster features the silhouette of a young woman standing on a ladder in front of a full moon, which speaks to the iconic power of Wilder’s image.)The production’s heightened theatricality emphasized its chosen theme of community. From the very first scene, the production physically demonstrated how intimately the residents of Grover’s Corners are involved in one another’s lives. While Wilder calls for the Webb and Gibbs breakfast tables to occupy the down-left and down-right corners of a proscenium stage, respectively, with the gardens facing each other toward center, Kent’s production placed the two breakfast tables literally side by side, center stage, separated by at most two inches. This meant that, for the intercut breakfast scene, it appeared that the two families sat at one large table together, rather than in separate houses—a foreshadowing of the literal joining of the families via Emily and George’s wedding in Act 2 (Fig. 2).The most interesting way in which the production emphasized community was in its attempts to make the audience feel like a part of the community of Grover’s Corners. This was most apparent in the production’s lighting design—or lack thereof. As Kent wrote in his director’s note, the production had “blessed few light cues,” and his team chose to keep the house lights up throughout the play to encourage the audience “to feel as though you are also a resident of our town because we all are.” Although the level of ambient light varied throughout the performance—the nighttime sequence of Act 1 and the entirety of Act 3 were noticeably dimmer than the rest—the house was lit throughout at just below the level of the stage. When the Stage Manager handed random audience members questions written on cards to ask Editor Webb in Act 1, it was not startling or surprising, as the audience already felt like members of the community.The costume design (by Meghan Anderson Doyle) further emphasized the connection between the audience and the actors. While there was a general early twentieth-century feel to the dresses and suits, the costumes strove for evocation rather than technical accuracy, and the simple lines downplayed the extent to which this was meant to seem like a “period” piece. And no effort was made to place the Stage Manager in a historically accurate period: Kent’s untucked white button-down shirt, jeans off the rack, glasses on a lanyard around his neck, long hair tied in a bun, and close-cropped beard would be more at home in a coffee shop in 2023 than in Mr. Morgan’s soda fountain in 1901.The casting of the production also showed an effort to reflect the community of Arvada and greater Denver. Mrs. Gibbs (Emily Van Fleet) and Mrs. Webb (Diana Dresser) were both played by white actors. Dr. Gibbs (Lavour Addison) was played by a Black actor, and for George (Teej Morgan-Arzola) the team cast an actor who appeared to be of blended heritage. Editor Webb (Matt Zambrano) was played by an actor of Latin descent, and Emily (Claylish Coldiron) also seemed a member of that community. These casting choices further closed the distance between Wilder’s world and ours, and they worked well.The performances were, on the whole, very strong. As the Stage Manager, Kent conveyed a warm, wry sensibility and visibly enjoyed being our guide through Grover’s Corners and Emily’s life. Particular standouts were the Gibbs and Webb parents, all four of whom found a loving if slightly world-weary gear that conveyed great caring, but also a wistful awareness that their children would soon grow up and leave them. All four parents were also up to the challenge of carrying most of the more comedic bits of the text; Zambrano’s delivery of Mr. Webb’s father’s advice to George on his wedding day in Act 2 was a particular standout. As Emily, Coldiron shifted adeptly between young girl and young woman, demonstrating a keen intelligence and steel as well as a deep reservoir of love for her family and for George. As George, Morgan-Arzola had a boundless energy and excitement for the future. The remainder of the company (Samantha Piel, Archer Rosenkrantz, Tresha Farris, Kate Gleason, Frank Oden, and Josh Robinson) ably filled out the world of Grover’s Corners, rising eagerly to the challenge, whether it was singing in the choir, making the offstage sound of a horse neighing, or appearing as a solemn mourner at Emily’s funeral. Kent’s direction focused on moving quickly and nimbly through the text, ensuring that the production never dragged.In Act 3, the staging worked to pull the audience fully into the world of the cemetery. While Wilder calls for the dead characters to be seated in three rows of chairs together right of center facing downstage, Kent’s production situated the primary four dead—Mrs. Gibbs, Mrs. Soames, Mr. Stimson, and Wally Webb—in chairs next to the front row of each of the four audience seating banks, facing in toward the stage. Then, as Emily was brought in by a parade of umbrella-bearing mourners, she ultimately sat down in a chair dead center. No audience member could effectively see all four dead characters, so as the dead spoke to Emily, it was almost as if we, too, were among the dead greeting our latest companion. Act 3 is the most abstract section of the play, and staging it in this way enhanced the disconnection between audience and narrative that is inherent in Wilder’s text. It was an effective choice.After Emily traveled back to her birthday and returned to the cemetery, the Stage Manager appeared directly upstage of her during her final colloquy with the dead, rolling the ghost light—idle next to the organ throughout the evening, but now lit once more—along with him. As he sent the audience off with a friendly, “Good night” (Collected Plays 209), he flipped off the ghost light, and we were plunged into darkness for the first time since the play began. In that moment, the heightened theatricality merged with the creative team’s work to build a community, and served as an emphatic conclusion to an excellent production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":478170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thornton Wilder journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thornton Wilder journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/thorntonwilderj.4.1.0123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thornton Wilder journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/thorntonwilderj.4.1.0123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《我们的小镇》将于2023年在阿瓦达艺术与人文中心上演,该中心的总裁兼首席执行官菲利普·斯尼德在节目说明中表示,该剧的核心关注点是“成为社区的一部分意味着什么”。他认为这反映在两个明显的意义上,即戏剧是对一个特定社区的探索,在一个短暂的一生之后。但在更微妙的意义上,这也是正确的,因为像Arvada中心这样的艺术组织慢慢地从COVID-19大流行中崛起,并开始努力重建维持它们的社区。斯尼德(和阿瓦达中心艺术总监琳恩·柯林斯)选择我们的小镇作为重新点燃社区火花的工具,邀请观众再次“与他人一起观看现场戏剧的公共体验”。导演杰弗里·肯特(他也扮演舞台经理)和他的艺术团队做出了几个重要的选择,以加强这个社区主题的两个方面(凯特·格里森担任助理导演)。首先,他们选择提高本已高度戏剧化的作品的戏剧性,从而使只能在现场获得的体验类型加倍。其次,他们的制作突出了角色和观众都是格罗弗角落社区成员的方式。这些选择大部分都成功了,并结合在一起,形成了一部简洁而抒情,但又极具戏剧性的作品,这是怀尔德最重要的一部戏剧。从一开始,肯特和他的团队就强调这部作品将是一部戏剧作品。阿瓦达中心的黑盒子剧场是一个可容纳200人的圆形空间。在晚上开始的时候,舞台经理并没有像怀尔德的舞台指导那样走进空荡荡的舞台,把场景布置好,而是在演员入场时混在观众中间。幕布即将落幕时,一位真正的舞台监督(舞台监督是克里斯汀·摩尔(Christine Moore),助理舞台监督是梅丽莎·j·迈克尔森(Melissa J. Michelson))走了进来,宣布给演员五分钟,他们回了一句“谢谢,五分钟”。这里没有布景,只有一个小电子琴和舞台中央的一盏幽灵灯(布景设计师是布莱恩·马尔格雷夫)。整个礼堂——舞台和房子——灯火通明(灯光设计由乔恩·邓克尔(Jon Dunkle)设计)。幕布时间到了,演员们聚集在舞台中央的幽灵灯周围,围成一圈,进行简短的身体和声音热身(图1)。几分钟后,他们开始合唱我们小镇的标志性圣歌——“祝福领带”——而不是唱歌词(同样扮演吉布斯夫人的艾米丽·范·弗利特是音乐总监)。赞美诗唱完后,舞台监督立刻行动起来,走上三四级台阶,进入其中一个包厢,开始他的开场独白。他一边谈论着即将到来的黎明,一边走回了圈子的中心。他告诉观众:“晨星总是在它即将离去的前一分钟变得非常明亮,不是吗?”(剧集第149页),他按下开关,关掉了鬼灯,演出正式开始。一旦格罗弗角的居民开始他们的一天,另一个戏剧化的方面的生产显露出来。除了少数例外,整个制作过程没有使用任何道具;相反,演员们用哑剧表演了他们所有的舞台表演(同样扮演韦伯的哑剧编舞是马特·桑布拉诺(Matt Zambrano))。在某些商业场景中,台下但仍能看到的演员会配合假演提供音效:在第一幕中,吉布斯太太帮韦伯太太拿豆子时,演员们模仿了咬豆子的动作,台下的同胞们也跟着假演一起拍了起来。当乔·克罗威尔(Joe Crowell)扔报纸时,公司成员把卷成的剧本拍到他们的掌心,这样观众就能“听到”报纸落在前面的台阶上;当舞台经理(摩根先生)在第二幕为艾米丽和乔治制作冰淇淋苏打水时,舞台经理拉苏打水龙头时,台下的演员发出嘶嘶声。伴随着声音效果的哑剧片段更引人注目,但最终比舞台上的普通哑剧(打开橱柜,倒咖啡等)更有效。有些演员比其他人更擅长哑剧表演——桑布拉诺毫无疑问是其中的佼佼者——但这是一个令人欢迎的提醒,提醒人们现场戏剧的力量和多样性。道具的极简主义也延续到了布景的其他部分。两张小桌子和四把椅子构成了使徒行传第一章和第二章中韦伯和吉布斯家的全部。在各自母亲的花园里,有两条长凳充当坐椅。摩根先生的苏打柜台是横跨在两把椅子背后的一块长木板。威拉德教授那篇关于格罗弗街角的上古历史的论文,是借助一个什么也没有的画架完成的。 当乔治和艾米丽在各自的房间里讨论他们的数学作业时,演员们站在对面角落高处的椅子上。(具有讽刺意味的是,虽然制作人员没有在乔治和艾米丽的窗户上使用典型的梯子,但制作海报上有一个年轻女子站在满月前的梯子上的剪影,这说明了怀尔德形象的标志性力量。)这出戏的高度戏剧性强调了它所选择的社会主题。从第一个场景开始,这部作品就展示了格罗弗角落的居民是如何密切地参与彼此的生活。怀尔德要求韦伯和吉布斯的早餐桌分别占据前台舞台的左下和右下两个角落,花园面向中心,而肯特的作品则把两张早餐桌并排放在舞台中心,最多相隔两英寸。这意味着,在交错的早餐场景中,这两个家庭似乎一起坐在一张大桌子旁,而不是在不同的房子里——这是第二幕中艾米丽和乔治的婚礼中两个家庭真正结合的预兆(图2)。该剧强调社区的最有趣的方式是试图让观众感觉自己是格罗弗角落社区的一部分。这一点在影片的灯光设计(或者说缺乏灯光设计)上表现得最为明显。正如肯特在他的导演说明中所写的那样,这部剧“很少有灯光提示”,他的团队选择在整部戏中保持灯光亮着,以鼓励观众“觉得你也是我们小镇的居民,因为我们都是”。尽管在整个演出过程中,环境光线的水平是不同的——第一幕和第三幕的夜间镜头明显比其他部分要暗——但整个房子的灯光始终低于舞台的水平。在第一幕中,当舞台经理把写在卡片上的问题随机交给观众,让他们问编辑韦伯时,观众并不感到吃惊或惊讶,因为他们已经觉得自己是社区的一员。服装设计(由Meghan Anderson Doyle设计)进一步强调了观众和演员之间的联系。虽然礼服和套装有一种20世纪早期的感觉,但服装力求唤起人们的共鸣,而不是技术上的精确,简单的线条淡化了它看起来像一个“时代”作品的程度。他们也没有刻意把舞台经理放在一个准确的历史时期:肯特的白色衬衫没有收好,牛仔裤没有放在架子上,眼镜挂在脖子上,长发扎成一个发髻,胡子剪得很短,在2023年的咖啡馆里比在1901年的摩根的饮水机里更自在。这部作品的选角也显示了反映阿瓦达和大丹佛社区的努力。吉布斯夫人(艾米丽·范·弗利特饰)和韦伯夫人(戴安娜·德莱塞饰)都由白人演员饰演。吉布斯医生(拉沃·艾迪生饰)由一位黑人演员饰演,乔治(蒂吉·摩根-阿佐拉饰)则由一位混血演员饰演。编辑韦伯(马特·桑布拉诺饰)由一位拉丁裔演员扮演,艾米丽(克莱利什·科尔迪隆饰)似乎也是拉丁裔。这些选角进一步拉近了怀尔德的世界和我们的世界之间的距离,而且效果很好。总的来说,演出非常精彩。作为舞台经理,肯特表现出一种温暖、讽刺的情感,显然他很享受作为我们在格罗弗角落和艾米丽生活中的向导。特别突出的是吉布斯和韦伯的父母,他们四个人都找到了一个充满爱的,虽然有点厌倦世界的齿轮,传达了极大的关怀,但也有一种渴望的意识,即他们的孩子很快就会长大并离开他们。这四位家长也都接受了挑战,承担了书中大部分比较喜剧的部分;在第二幕中,桑布拉诺在乔治婚礼当天向他传达韦布父亲的建议,这一幕尤其引人注目。饰演艾米丽的科尔迪伦在年轻女孩和年轻女人之间巧妙地转换,展现出敏锐的智慧和钢铁,以及对家人和乔治的深爱。作为乔治,摩根-阿佐拉对未来充满了无限的活力和激情。剧团的其他成员(萨曼莎·皮尔、阿彻·罗森克兰茨、特蕾莎·法里斯、凯特·格里森、弗兰克·奥登和乔希·罗宾逊)巧妙地填补了《格罗弗的角落》的世界,他们热切地迎接挑战,无论是在唱诗班唱歌,在舞台下发出马的嘶鸣声,还是在艾米丽的葬礼上作为一个庄严的哀悼者出现。肯特的指导重点是快速灵活地通过文本,确保生产不会拖。在第3幕中,舞台设计将观众完全带入墓地的世界。 怀尔德要求死去的角色一起坐在三排椅子上,面朝舞台下方,而肯特的作品则安排了四位死去的夫人。吉布斯、索姆斯太太、斯廷森先生和沃利·韦伯坐在四个观众席前排的椅子上,面朝舞台。然后,当一群拿着雨伞的哀悼者把艾米丽带进来时,她最终坐在了正中间的一张椅子上。没有观众能看到所有四个死去的角色,所以当死去的角色和艾米丽说话的时候,就好像我们也在和死去的角色打招呼一样。第三幕是全剧最抽象的部分,以这种方式上演加强了观众和叙事之间的脱节,这是怀尔德文本中固有的。这是一个有效的选择。艾米丽回到她的生日现场,回到墓地,在她与死者的最后一次对话中,舞台经理直接出现在她的舞台后面,整晚都在风琴旁边转动着幽灵灯,但现在又和他一起点燃了。他友好地说了一声“晚安”(剧集209)送走了观众,关掉了鬼灯,我们自开演以来第一次陷入黑暗。在那一刻,高度的戏剧性与创意团队的工作相结合,建立了一个社区,并作为一个优秀作品的有力结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Our Town, Arvada Center for the Arts and Humanities, Arvada, Colorado
In his program note to the 2023 production of Our Town at the Arvada Center for the Arts and Humanities, the Center’s President and CEO Phillip Sneed suggests that the play’s central preoccupation is “what it means to be part of a community.” He sees this reflected both in the obvious sense, in that the play is an exploration of a particular community over the course of—and just after—a brief lifetime. But it is also true in a more subtle sense, as arts organizations such as the Arvada Center emerge slowly from the COVID-19 pandemic and embark on the effort to rebuild the communities that sustain them. Sneed (and Arvada Center artistic director Lynne Collins) picked Our Town as a vehicle for reigniting that spark of community, inviting audience members to once again “join with others in the communal experience of watching live theatre.”Director Geoffrey Kent—who also plays the Stage Manager—and his artistic team make several significant choices to reinforce both aspects of this theme of community (Kate Gleason served as assistant director). First, they have chosen to heighten the theatricality of an already highly theatrical work, thus doubling down on the type of experience that can only be had live. And second, their production foregrounds the way in which both the characters and the audience are members of the community of Grover’s Corners. Most of these choices succeed and combine to form a spare and lyrical, yet powerfully theatrical, production of Wilder’s most essential play.From the start, Kent and his team emphasized that this production would be a work of theater. The Black Box Theatre at the Arvada Center is a 200-seat space in the round. At the outset of the evening, rather than the Stage Manager entering onto a bare stage and setting the scene as in Wilder’s stage directions, this production began with the actors mingling among the audience as they entered. As curtain time approached, an actual stage manager (the stage manager was Christine Moore and the assistant stage manager was Melissa J. Michelson) wandered through, announcing five minutes to the actors, who gave back a “thank you, five.” There was no scenery—just a small electric organ next to one of the voms and a ghost light in the center of the stage (the set designer was Brian Mallgrave). The entire auditorium—stage and house—was brightly and generally lit (lighting design was by Jon Dunkle).As curtain time arrived, the cast gathered center stage in a circle around the ghost light to go through an abbreviated physical and vocal warm-up (Fig. 1). After a few minutes, they began singing Our Town’s signature hymn—“Blest Be the Tie that Binds”—on a communal “ooh” rather than singing the words (Emily Van Fleet, also playing Mrs. Gibbs, was musical director). When the hymn was finished, the Stage Manager leaped into action, ascending the three or four steps into one of the voms, beginning his opening monologue. As he discussed the impending dawn, he walked back down into the center of the circle. Telling the audience, “The morning star always gets wonderful bright the minute before it has to go,—doesn’t it?” (Collected Plays 149), he flipped the switch to turn off the ghost light, and the production began in earnest.Once the residents of Grover’s Corners began their day, another theatricalized aspect of the production revealed itself. With a few spare exceptions, the production utilized no props; instead, the actors mimed all of their stage business (the mime choreographer—also playing Mr. Webb—was Matt Zambrano). For certain pieces of business, offstage but still visible actors provided sound effects timed to the miming: when Mrs. Gibbs helped Mrs. Webb with her beans in Act 1, the actors mimed snapping beans and their compatriots offstage snapped in time to the miming. When Joe Crowell threw newspapers, company members slapped rolled-up scripts into their palms, so the audience could “hear” the papers landing on front stoops, and when the Stage Manager (as Mr. Morgan) made ice cream sodas for Emily and George in Act 2, an offstage actor vocalized fizzing noises as the Stage Manager pulled the tap of the soda fountain. The bits of mime that had accompanying sound effects were more noticeable, but ultimately more effective than the garden-variety miming of stage business (opening cabinets, pouring coffee, etc.). Some performers were better at the mime than others—Zambrano was unsurprisingly a standout—but it was a welcome reminder of the power and versatility of live theater.The minimalism in the props carried through to the rest of the set as well. Two small tables and four chairs formed the entirety of the Webb and Gibbs homes in Acts 1 and 2. Two benches did duty as the seating in the respective mothers’ gardens. Mr. Morgan’s soda counter was a long plank across the backs of two chairs. Professor Willard’s disquisition on the antediluvian history of Grover’s Corners was delivered with the aid of an artist’s easel with nothing on it. And when George and Emily discussed their math homework from their respective rooms, the actors stood on chairs in opposite-corner elevated voms. (Ironically, while the production eschewed the typical ladders for George and Emily’s windows, the production poster features the silhouette of a young woman standing on a ladder in front of a full moon, which speaks to the iconic power of Wilder’s image.)The production’s heightened theatricality emphasized its chosen theme of community. From the very first scene, the production physically demonstrated how intimately the residents of Grover’s Corners are involved in one another’s lives. While Wilder calls for the Webb and Gibbs breakfast tables to occupy the down-left and down-right corners of a proscenium stage, respectively, with the gardens facing each other toward center, Kent’s production placed the two breakfast tables literally side by side, center stage, separated by at most two inches. This meant that, for the intercut breakfast scene, it appeared that the two families sat at one large table together, rather than in separate houses—a foreshadowing of the literal joining of the families via Emily and George’s wedding in Act 2 (Fig. 2).The most interesting way in which the production emphasized community was in its attempts to make the audience feel like a part of the community of Grover’s Corners. This was most apparent in the production’s lighting design—or lack thereof. As Kent wrote in his director’s note, the production had “blessed few light cues,” and his team chose to keep the house lights up throughout the play to encourage the audience “to feel as though you are also a resident of our town because we all are.” Although the level of ambient light varied throughout the performance—the nighttime sequence of Act 1 and the entirety of Act 3 were noticeably dimmer than the rest—the house was lit throughout at just below the level of the stage. When the Stage Manager handed random audience members questions written on cards to ask Editor Webb in Act 1, it was not startling or surprising, as the audience already felt like members of the community.The costume design (by Meghan Anderson Doyle) further emphasized the connection between the audience and the actors. While there was a general early twentieth-century feel to the dresses and suits, the costumes strove for evocation rather than technical accuracy, and the simple lines downplayed the extent to which this was meant to seem like a “period” piece. And no effort was made to place the Stage Manager in a historically accurate period: Kent’s untucked white button-down shirt, jeans off the rack, glasses on a lanyard around his neck, long hair tied in a bun, and close-cropped beard would be more at home in a coffee shop in 2023 than in Mr. Morgan’s soda fountain in 1901.The casting of the production also showed an effort to reflect the community of Arvada and greater Denver. Mrs. Gibbs (Emily Van Fleet) and Mrs. Webb (Diana Dresser) were both played by white actors. Dr. Gibbs (Lavour Addison) was played by a Black actor, and for George (Teej Morgan-Arzola) the team cast an actor who appeared to be of blended heritage. Editor Webb (Matt Zambrano) was played by an actor of Latin descent, and Emily (Claylish Coldiron) also seemed a member of that community. These casting choices further closed the distance between Wilder’s world and ours, and they worked well.The performances were, on the whole, very strong. As the Stage Manager, Kent conveyed a warm, wry sensibility and visibly enjoyed being our guide through Grover’s Corners and Emily’s life. Particular standouts were the Gibbs and Webb parents, all four of whom found a loving if slightly world-weary gear that conveyed great caring, but also a wistful awareness that their children would soon grow up and leave them. All four parents were also up to the challenge of carrying most of the more comedic bits of the text; Zambrano’s delivery of Mr. Webb’s father’s advice to George on his wedding day in Act 2 was a particular standout. As Emily, Coldiron shifted adeptly between young girl and young woman, demonstrating a keen intelligence and steel as well as a deep reservoir of love for her family and for George. As George, Morgan-Arzola had a boundless energy and excitement for the future. The remainder of the company (Samantha Piel, Archer Rosenkrantz, Tresha Farris, Kate Gleason, Frank Oden, and Josh Robinson) ably filled out the world of Grover’s Corners, rising eagerly to the challenge, whether it was singing in the choir, making the offstage sound of a horse neighing, or appearing as a solemn mourner at Emily’s funeral. Kent’s direction focused on moving quickly and nimbly through the text, ensuring that the production never dragged.In Act 3, the staging worked to pull the audience fully into the world of the cemetery. While Wilder calls for the dead characters to be seated in three rows of chairs together right of center facing downstage, Kent’s production situated the primary four dead—Mrs. Gibbs, Mrs. Soames, Mr. Stimson, and Wally Webb—in chairs next to the front row of each of the four audience seating banks, facing in toward the stage. Then, as Emily was brought in by a parade of umbrella-bearing mourners, she ultimately sat down in a chair dead center. No audience member could effectively see all four dead characters, so as the dead spoke to Emily, it was almost as if we, too, were among the dead greeting our latest companion. Act 3 is the most abstract section of the play, and staging it in this way enhanced the disconnection between audience and narrative that is inherent in Wilder’s text. It was an effective choice.After Emily traveled back to her birthday and returned to the cemetery, the Stage Manager appeared directly upstage of her during her final colloquy with the dead, rolling the ghost light—idle next to the organ throughout the evening, but now lit once more—along with him. As he sent the audience off with a friendly, “Good night” (Collected Plays 209), he flipped off the ghost light, and we were plunged into darkness for the first time since the play began. In that moment, the heightened theatricality merged with the creative team’s work to build a community, and served as an emphatic conclusion to an excellent production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信