编辑说明

Q2 Social Sciences
Sarah Mason, Bianca Montrosse‐Moorhead
{"title":"编辑说明","authors":"Sarah Mason, Bianca Montrosse‐Moorhead","doi":"10.1002/ev.20563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New Directions for EvaluationVolume 2023, Issue 178-179 p. 7-10 EDITORIAL Editors’ notes Sarah Mason, Sarah Mason University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USASearch for more papers by this authorBianca Montrosse-Moorhead, Corresponding Author Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA Correspondence Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Sarah Mason, Sarah Mason University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USASearch for more papers by this authorBianca Montrosse-Moorhead, Corresponding Author Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA Correspondence Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 03 November 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20563Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Leeuw, F. L. (2020). Program evaluation B: Evaluation, big data, and artificial intelligence: Two sides of one coin. In E. Vigoda-Gadot & D. R. Vashdi (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration, management and policy (pp. 277–297). Elgar. Mason, S. (2023). Finding a safe zone in the highlands: Exploring evaluator competencies in the world of AI. New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(178–179), 11–22. OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT (November 2022 version) [Large language model]. Retrieved from http://chat.openai.com/chat Teasdale, R. M. (2021). Evaluative criteria: An integrated model of domains and sources. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(3), 354–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020955226 Teasdale, R. M. (2022). Representing the values of program participants: Endogenous evaluative criteria. Evaluation and Program Planning, 94, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102123 Teasdale, R., Strasser, M., Moore, C., & Graham, K. (2023). Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in evaluation and program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97, 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102226 Thornton, I. (2023). A special delivery by a fork: Where does Artificial Intelligence come from? New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(178–179), 23–32. Volume2023, Issue178-179Special Issue: Evaluation and Artificial IntelligenceSummer-Fall 2023Pages 7-10 ReferencesRelatedInformation","PeriodicalId":35250,"journal":{"name":"New Directions for Evaluation","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors’ notes\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Mason, Bianca Montrosse‐Moorhead\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ev.20563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New Directions for EvaluationVolume 2023, Issue 178-179 p. 7-10 EDITORIAL Editors’ notes Sarah Mason, Sarah Mason University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USASearch for more papers by this authorBianca Montrosse-Moorhead, Corresponding Author Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA Correspondence Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Sarah Mason, Sarah Mason University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USASearch for more papers by this authorBianca Montrosse-Moorhead, Corresponding Author Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA Correspondence Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 03 November 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20563Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Leeuw, F. L. (2020). Program evaluation B: Evaluation, big data, and artificial intelligence: Two sides of one coin. In E. Vigoda-Gadot & D. R. Vashdi (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration, management and policy (pp. 277–297). Elgar. Mason, S. (2023). Finding a safe zone in the highlands: Exploring evaluator competencies in the world of AI. New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(178–179), 11–22. OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT (November 2022 version) [Large language model]. Retrieved from http://chat.openai.com/chat Teasdale, R. M. (2021). Evaluative criteria: An integrated model of domains and sources. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(3), 354–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020955226 Teasdale, R. M. (2022). Representing the values of program participants: Endogenous evaluative criteria. Evaluation and Program Planning, 94, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102123 Teasdale, R., Strasser, M., Moore, C., & Graham, K. (2023). Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in evaluation and program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97, 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102226 Thornton, I. (2023). A special delivery by a fork: Where does Artificial Intelligence come from? New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(178–179), 23–32. Volume2023, Issue178-179Special Issue: Evaluation and Artificial IntelligenceSummer-Fall 2023Pages 7-10 ReferencesRelatedInformation\",\"PeriodicalId\":35250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Directions for Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Directions for Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20563\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions for Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新方向评估第2023卷,第178-179页7-10编辑编辑的注释Sarah Mason, Sarah Mason密西西比大学,牛津,密西西比州,美国搜索作者Bianca montrose - moorhead的更多论文,通讯作者Bianca montrose - moorhead [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347美国康涅狄格大学,斯托斯,康涅狄格州,美国通信Bianca montrose - moorhead,康涅狄格大学,斯托斯,康涅狄格州,美国。电子邮件:[Email protected]搜索作者Sarah Mason的更多论文,Sarah Mason密西西比大学,牛津,美国。搜索作者Bianca montrose - moorhead的更多论文,通讯作者Bianca montrose - moorhead [Email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347美国康涅狄格大学,斯托斯,康涅狄格通信Bianca montrose - moorhead,康涅狄格大学,斯托斯,康涅狄格,美国。邮箱:[Email protected]搜索该作者的更多论文首次发表:2023年11月3日https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20563Read全文taboutpdf ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare给予accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare全文accessShare请查看我们的使用条款和条件,并在下面的复选框中选择分享文章的全文版本。我已经阅读并接受了Wiley在线图书馆使用共享链接的条款和条件,请使用下面的链接与您的朋友和同事分享本文的全文版本。学习更多的知识。链接共享emailfacebooktwitterlinkedinreddit微信参考文献leeul .(2020)。项目评估B:评估、大数据、人工智能:一枚硬币的两面。参见E. Vigoda-Gadot & D. R. Vashdi(主编),《公共行政、管理和政策研究方法手册》(第277-297页)。埃尔加。梅森,S.(2023)。在高地上寻找安全地带:探索人工智能世界中的评估者能力。评价新方向,2023(178-179),11-22。OpenAI。(2022)。ChatGPT(2022年11月版本)[大型语言模型]。检索自http://chat.openai.com/chat Teasdale, R. M.(2021)。评价标准:域和源的集成模型。评价学报,42(3),354-376。https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020955226 Teasdale, r.m.(2022)。代表项目参与者的价值:内生性评价标准。评价与规划,1994,10(2):123。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102123 Teasdale, R., Strasser, M., Moore, C., & Graham, K.(2023)。实践中的评价标准:对发表在《评价与项目规划》上的评价进行分析得出的结论。评价与规划,1997,102226。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102226桑顿,I.(2023)。用叉子送快递:人工智能从何而来?评价新方向,2023(178-179),23-32。vol . 2023, Issue: 178-179 special Issue: Evaluation and Artificial intelligence, summer - fall, 2023Pages 7-10 ReferencesRelatedInformation
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editors’ notes
New Directions for EvaluationVolume 2023, Issue 178-179 p. 7-10 EDITORIAL Editors’ notes Sarah Mason, Sarah Mason University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USASearch for more papers by this authorBianca Montrosse-Moorhead, Corresponding Author Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA Correspondence Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Sarah Mason, Sarah Mason University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USASearch for more papers by this authorBianca Montrosse-Moorhead, Corresponding Author Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-0347 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA Correspondence Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 03 November 2023 https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20563Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Leeuw, F. L. (2020). Program evaluation B: Evaluation, big data, and artificial intelligence: Two sides of one coin. In E. Vigoda-Gadot & D. R. Vashdi (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in public administration, management and policy (pp. 277–297). Elgar. Mason, S. (2023). Finding a safe zone in the highlands: Exploring evaluator competencies in the world of AI. New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(178–179), 11–22. OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT (November 2022 version) [Large language model]. Retrieved from http://chat.openai.com/chat Teasdale, R. M. (2021). Evaluative criteria: An integrated model of domains and sources. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(3), 354–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020955226 Teasdale, R. M. (2022). Representing the values of program participants: Endogenous evaluative criteria. Evaluation and Program Planning, 94, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102123 Teasdale, R., Strasser, M., Moore, C., & Graham, K. (2023). Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in evaluation and program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 97, 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102226 Thornton, I. (2023). A special delivery by a fork: Where does Artificial Intelligence come from? New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(178–179), 23–32. Volume2023, Issue178-179Special Issue: Evaluation and Artificial IntelligenceSummer-Fall 2023Pages 7-10 ReferencesRelatedInformation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Directions for Evaluation
New Directions for Evaluation Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信