离开的过程:改编《提图斯·安多尼克斯》的对话与实践

Stephen Drover
{"title":"离开的过程:改编《提图斯·安多尼克斯》的对话与实践","authors":"Stephen Drover","doi":"10.1353/shb.2023.a910441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: While most adaptation scholarship has predominantly concentrated on product—comparing source material to adapted script—there is a noticeable lack of process analysis applied to understanding new adaptations. The focus of this article is to examine the working process of adaptation under the permissive classification of \"departure\" from a rehearsal room perspective, and to propose a framework for analyzing that process. This article endeavors to answer the question of what the working process of intentionally departing from Shakespeare looks like in our contemporary theater practice. Using autoethnography, ethnography, and literature review, I detail and compare the creation processes of two contemporary Shakespeare departures based on Titus Andronicus—The Society for the Destitute Presents Titus Bouffonius and Black Fly—and propose an analytical framework that is based on collaboration between artists, negotiations of fidelity, and a reclamation of narrative.","PeriodicalId":304234,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare Bulletin","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process of Departures: Conversations and Practice in Adapting Titus Andronicus\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Drover\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/shb.2023.a910441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: While most adaptation scholarship has predominantly concentrated on product—comparing source material to adapted script—there is a noticeable lack of process analysis applied to understanding new adaptations. The focus of this article is to examine the working process of adaptation under the permissive classification of \\\"departure\\\" from a rehearsal room perspective, and to propose a framework for analyzing that process. This article endeavors to answer the question of what the working process of intentionally departing from Shakespeare looks like in our contemporary theater practice. Using autoethnography, ethnography, and literature review, I detail and compare the creation processes of two contemporary Shakespeare departures based on Titus Andronicus—The Society for the Destitute Presents Titus Bouffonius and Black Fly—and propose an analytical framework that is based on collaboration between artists, negotiations of fidelity, and a reclamation of narrative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shakespeare Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shakespeare Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2023.a910441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2023.a910441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:虽然大多数改编研究主要集中在产品-将源材料与改编剧本进行比较-但明显缺乏用于理解新改编的过程分析。本文的重点是从排练室的角度考察“离开”容许分类下的适应工作过程,并提出一个分析这一过程的框架。本文试图回答在我们当代戏剧实践中有意背离莎士比亚的工作过程是什么样子的问题。运用民族志、民族志和文献回顾,我详细地比较了以《提图斯·安多罗尼乌斯》为基础的两部当代莎士比亚作品的创作过程——《穷人协会》和《黑苍蝇》——并提出了一个基于艺术家之间合作、忠诚谈判和叙事复兴的分析框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process of Departures: Conversations and Practice in Adapting Titus Andronicus
Abstract: While most adaptation scholarship has predominantly concentrated on product—comparing source material to adapted script—there is a noticeable lack of process analysis applied to understanding new adaptations. The focus of this article is to examine the working process of adaptation under the permissive classification of "departure" from a rehearsal room perspective, and to propose a framework for analyzing that process. This article endeavors to answer the question of what the working process of intentionally departing from Shakespeare looks like in our contemporary theater practice. Using autoethnography, ethnography, and literature review, I detail and compare the creation processes of two contemporary Shakespeare departures based on Titus Andronicus—The Society for the Destitute Presents Titus Bouffonius and Black Fly—and propose an analytical framework that is based on collaboration between artists, negotiations of fidelity, and a reclamation of narrative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信