{"title":"遗嘱执行中遗嘱人、受益人和继承人之间的平衡:以Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB)为例","authors":"Raouane Azziz","doi":"10.17576/islamiyyat-2023-4501-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The arrival of Islam ensured balance in all its legislation. The property owner has the right of implementing the will and protecting the rights of the heirs, whereby a balance is achieved between the owner and those entitled to the property inheritance. Islam allows the property owner the right to dispose of a third of his ownership by will for whomever he wished during his life and the remaining property belongs to the heirs is not valid to be dispose of. This right is God’s commandment that enjoined the inheritance to those who deserve it according to the shares determined by the Sharia. Herein lies the research problem; the Shariah did not give freedom to the property owner to do as he wish to. Rather, Islam specified the recommended amount which he should not exceed. The aim of this study is to discuss and analyze the case of will writing in Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB), and the conditions for its implementation. This study relied on inductive approach, by following the opinions of the jurists and their evidence regarding the conditions of entitlement to the will and the validity of its contract for the benefactor. An analytical method is used in discussing and analyzing the opinions and evidence of the jurists to the provisions with what is done in the Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB). This study reached important results: Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB) did not acknowledge the obligatory bequest (wasiat wajibah) if the owner of the property did not make a will. This contrasts with the Fatwa Department in Malaysia. Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB) prohibits the will of the heir and suspended its implementation on the consent of the heirs. It permitted a non-Muslim to make a will and freedom to carry out his will.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving A Balance in the Execution of the Will Between the Testator, the Beneficiary, And the Heir: A Case Study of Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB)\",\"authors\":\"Raouane Azziz\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/islamiyyat-2023-4501-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The arrival of Islam ensured balance in all its legislation. The property owner has the right of implementing the will and protecting the rights of the heirs, whereby a balance is achieved between the owner and those entitled to the property inheritance. Islam allows the property owner the right to dispose of a third of his ownership by will for whomever he wished during his life and the remaining property belongs to the heirs is not valid to be dispose of. This right is God’s commandment that enjoined the inheritance to those who deserve it according to the shares determined by the Sharia. Herein lies the research problem; the Shariah did not give freedom to the property owner to do as he wish to. Rather, Islam specified the recommended amount which he should not exceed. The aim of this study is to discuss and analyze the case of will writing in Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB), and the conditions for its implementation. This study relied on inductive approach, by following the opinions of the jurists and their evidence regarding the conditions of entitlement to the will and the validity of its contract for the benefactor. An analytical method is used in discussing and analyzing the opinions and evidence of the jurists to the provisions with what is done in the Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB). This study reached important results: Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB) did not acknowledge the obligatory bequest (wasiat wajibah) if the owner of the property did not make a will. This contrasts with the Fatwa Department in Malaysia. Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB) prohibits the will of the heir and suspended its implementation on the consent of the heirs. It permitted a non-Muslim to make a will and freedom to carry out his will.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2023-4501-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2023-4501-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
伊斯兰教的到来确保了所有立法的平衡。财产所有人有履行遗嘱和保护继承人权利的权利,实现了财产所有人和财产受继承者之间的平衡。伊斯兰教允许财产所有人有权通过遗嘱将其财产的三分之一转让给他生前希望转让给的任何人,其余属于继承人的财产不得转让。这种权利是上帝的命令,要求那些根据伊斯兰教法确定的份额配得继承权的人继承。这就是研究的问题所在;伊斯兰教法并没有给予财产所有人做他想做的事的自由。相反,伊斯兰指定了他不应超过的推荐量。本研究的目的是讨论和分析遗嘱写作在阿曼纳拉亚Berhad (ARB)的情况,并为其实施的条件。本研究采用归纳法,遵循法学家的意见及其关于遗嘱权利条件和受益人合同有效性的证据。在讨论和分析法学家对Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB)中所做的规定的意见和证据时,采用了分析方法。这项研究得出了重要的结论:如果财产所有者没有立遗嘱,Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB)就不承认强制性遗赠(wasiat wajibah)。这与马来西亚的法特瓦部形成鲜明对比。Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB)禁止继承人的遗嘱,并在继承人同意后暂停执行遗嘱。它允许非穆斯林立下遗嘱并自由地执行他的遗嘱。
Achieving A Balance in the Execution of the Will Between the Testator, the Beneficiary, And the Heir: A Case Study of Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB)
The arrival of Islam ensured balance in all its legislation. The property owner has the right of implementing the will and protecting the rights of the heirs, whereby a balance is achieved between the owner and those entitled to the property inheritance. Islam allows the property owner the right to dispose of a third of his ownership by will for whomever he wished during his life and the remaining property belongs to the heirs is not valid to be dispose of. This right is God’s commandment that enjoined the inheritance to those who deserve it according to the shares determined by the Sharia. Herein lies the research problem; the Shariah did not give freedom to the property owner to do as he wish to. Rather, Islam specified the recommended amount which he should not exceed. The aim of this study is to discuss and analyze the case of will writing in Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB), and the conditions for its implementation. This study relied on inductive approach, by following the opinions of the jurists and their evidence regarding the conditions of entitlement to the will and the validity of its contract for the benefactor. An analytical method is used in discussing and analyzing the opinions and evidence of the jurists to the provisions with what is done in the Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB). This study reached important results: Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB) did not acknowledge the obligatory bequest (wasiat wajibah) if the owner of the property did not make a will. This contrasts with the Fatwa Department in Malaysia. Amanah Raya Berhad (ARB) prohibits the will of the heir and suspended its implementation on the consent of the heirs. It permitted a non-Muslim to make a will and freedom to carry out his will.