第九条是硕士的工具:(重新)概念化美国教育中的性别和种族平等

Tori Justin, Katelyn E. Foltz
{"title":"第九条是硕士的工具:(重新)概念化美国教育中的性别和种族平等","authors":"Tori Justin, Katelyn E. Foltz","doi":"10.1353/bsr.2023.a910427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In this conceptual article, we theorize Title IX as colorblind policy that functions as the master’s tool. Specifically, we contend that due to Title IX’s colorblind approach and its roots in white feminism, its ability to eliminate sex discrimination in education is ineffective. We begin our argument by discussing the origins of Title IX and its race-based limitations. We then offer a brief history of the relationship between whiteness, education, and Black learners, and conclude with a critique of the usefulness of policies like Title IX and question their ability to create meaningful change.","PeriodicalId":73626,"journal":{"name":"Journal of black sexuality and relationships","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Title IX is the Master’s Tool: (Re)conceptualizing Gender and Race Equity in U.S. Education\",\"authors\":\"Tori Justin, Katelyn E. Foltz\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/bsr.2023.a910427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: In this conceptual article, we theorize Title IX as colorblind policy that functions as the master’s tool. Specifically, we contend that due to Title IX’s colorblind approach and its roots in white feminism, its ability to eliminate sex discrimination in education is ineffective. We begin our argument by discussing the origins of Title IX and its race-based limitations. We then offer a brief history of the relationship between whiteness, education, and Black learners, and conclude with a critique of the usefulness of policies like Title IX and question their ability to create meaningful change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of black sexuality and relationships\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of black sexuality and relationships\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/bsr.2023.a910427\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of black sexuality and relationships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bsr.2023.a910427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在这篇概念性的文章中,我们将《教育法修正案第九条》理论化为一种作为校长工具的色盲政策。具体而言,我们认为,由于《教育法修正案第九条》的不分肤色的做法及其根源于白人女权主义,它消除教育中的性别歧视的能力是无效的。我们首先讨论第九条的起源及其基于种族的限制。然后,我们简要介绍了白人、教育和黑人学习者之间的关系,最后对第九条等政策的有用性进行了批评,并质疑它们创造有意义变革的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Title IX is the Master’s Tool: (Re)conceptualizing Gender and Race Equity in U.S. Education
Abstract: In this conceptual article, we theorize Title IX as colorblind policy that functions as the master’s tool. Specifically, we contend that due to Title IX’s colorblind approach and its roots in white feminism, its ability to eliminate sex discrimination in education is ineffective. We begin our argument by discussing the origins of Title IX and its race-based limitations. We then offer a brief history of the relationship between whiteness, education, and Black learners, and conclude with a critique of the usefulness of policies like Title IX and question their ability to create meaningful change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信