Corinne N. Carlton, Emma Larkin, Jolee A. Sloss, Thomas H. Ollendick
{"title":"亲子信息差异与临床医师一致性:青少年社交焦虑障碍评估的意义","authors":"Corinne N. Carlton, Emma Larkin, Jolee A. Sloss, Thomas H. Ollendick","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2023.2261448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe present study had the following aims: 1) Evaluate the degree of discrepancy between parents and their adolescents when reporting social anxiety; 2) Determine if reporting discrepancies between parents and adolescents predict social anxiety severity and impairment ratings following treatment and; 3) Assess if clinician-rated social anxiety severity more strongly aligns with parent- or adolescent-reported social anxiety. Participants included 58 adolescents (12–16 years of age; Mage = 14.29, SD = 1.30; 70.7% female) who participated in a randomized clinical trial. Participants and their parents separately completed the diagnostic interview and self-report measures regarding social anxiety. Results indicate significant parent-adolescent discrepancies regarding the adolescent’s social anxiety; however, parent and adolescent discrepancies were lower on specific feared social situations. Additionally, results demonstrate that correspondence in parent-adolescent reporting was associated with improved treatment outcomes. Lastly, results indicate that clinicians more strongly aligned themselves with parental report of social anxiety. AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge the graduate students, research assistants, and undergraduate students who assisted us with various aspects of this project. We also wish to express appreciation to the adolescents and families who participated in this clinical research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData is available upon request. We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions, all manipulations, and all measures in the study.Statement of human rightsThis study received approval from the Virginia Tech’s Institutional Review Board, and all participants provided informed consent to participant in the study.Notes1 In the original RCT (Ollendick et al., Citation2019) in addition to the above-mentioned age range, inclusion criteria for the original study included: (1) a diagnosis of SAD via clinical interview; (2) an FSIQ of 80+; (3) stable psychotropic medication and; (4) no current treatment for social-anxiety related difficulties.","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parent-Adolescent Informant Discrepancies and Clinician Alignment: Implications for the Assessment of Adolescent Social Anxiety Disorder\",\"authors\":\"Corinne N. Carlton, Emma Larkin, Jolee A. Sloss, Thomas H. Ollendick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23794925.2023.2261448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe present study had the following aims: 1) Evaluate the degree of discrepancy between parents and their adolescents when reporting social anxiety; 2) Determine if reporting discrepancies between parents and adolescents predict social anxiety severity and impairment ratings following treatment and; 3) Assess if clinician-rated social anxiety severity more strongly aligns with parent- or adolescent-reported social anxiety. Participants included 58 adolescents (12–16 years of age; Mage = 14.29, SD = 1.30; 70.7% female) who participated in a randomized clinical trial. Participants and their parents separately completed the diagnostic interview and self-report measures regarding social anxiety. Results indicate significant parent-adolescent discrepancies regarding the adolescent’s social anxiety; however, parent and adolescent discrepancies were lower on specific feared social situations. Additionally, results demonstrate that correspondence in parent-adolescent reporting was associated with improved treatment outcomes. Lastly, results indicate that clinicians more strongly aligned themselves with parental report of social anxiety. AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge the graduate students, research assistants, and undergraduate students who assisted us with various aspects of this project. We also wish to express appreciation to the adolescents and families who participated in this clinical research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData is available upon request. We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions, all manipulations, and all measures in the study.Statement of human rightsThis study received approval from the Virginia Tech’s Institutional Review Board, and all participants provided informed consent to participant in the study.Notes1 In the original RCT (Ollendick et al., Citation2019) in addition to the above-mentioned age range, inclusion criteria for the original study included: (1) a diagnosis of SAD via clinical interview; (2) an FSIQ of 80+; (3) stable psychotropic medication and; (4) no current treatment for social-anxiety related difficulties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2261448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2261448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本研究的目的是:1)评估父母与青少年在社交焦虑报告上的差异程度;2)确定父母和青少年之间的报告差异是否能预测治疗后社交焦虑的严重程度和损害等级;3)评估临床医生评定的社交焦虑严重程度是否与父母或青少年报告的社交焦虑程度更为一致。参与者包括58名青少年(12-16岁;法师= 14.29,SD = 1.30;70.7%女性),她们参加了一项随机临床试验。参与者和他们的父母分别完成了关于社交焦虑的诊断性访谈和自我报告测量。结果表明:青少年社交焦虑存在显著的父母-青少年差异;然而,父母和青少年在特定的恐惧社会情境上的差异较低。此外,结果表明,家长-青少年报告的一致性与治疗结果的改善有关。最后,结果表明临床医生更强烈地与父母报告的社交焦虑一致。我们要感谢在这个项目的各个方面帮助我们的研究生、研究助理和本科生。我们也要对参与这项临床研究的青少年和家庭表示感谢。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明数据可根据要求提供。我们报告我们如何确定我们的样本量,所有数据排除,所有操作,以及研究中的所有措施。人权声明本研究获得了弗吉尼亚理工大学机构审查委员会的批准,所有参与者都提供了参与研究的知情同意书。注1在原始RCT (Ollendick et al., Citation2019)中,除了上述年龄范围外,原始研究的纳入标准还包括:(1)通过临床访谈诊断为SAD;(2) FSIQ为80+;(三)稳定的精神药物;(4)目前没有治疗社交焦虑相关的困难。
Parent-Adolescent Informant Discrepancies and Clinician Alignment: Implications for the Assessment of Adolescent Social Anxiety Disorder
ABSTRACTThe present study had the following aims: 1) Evaluate the degree of discrepancy between parents and their adolescents when reporting social anxiety; 2) Determine if reporting discrepancies between parents and adolescents predict social anxiety severity and impairment ratings following treatment and; 3) Assess if clinician-rated social anxiety severity more strongly aligns with parent- or adolescent-reported social anxiety. Participants included 58 adolescents (12–16 years of age; Mage = 14.29, SD = 1.30; 70.7% female) who participated in a randomized clinical trial. Participants and their parents separately completed the diagnostic interview and self-report measures regarding social anxiety. Results indicate significant parent-adolescent discrepancies regarding the adolescent’s social anxiety; however, parent and adolescent discrepancies were lower on specific feared social situations. Additionally, results demonstrate that correspondence in parent-adolescent reporting was associated with improved treatment outcomes. Lastly, results indicate that clinicians more strongly aligned themselves with parental report of social anxiety. AcknowledgmentsWe would like to acknowledge the graduate students, research assistants, and undergraduate students who assisted us with various aspects of this project. We also wish to express appreciation to the adolescents and families who participated in this clinical research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementData is available upon request. We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions, all manipulations, and all measures in the study.Statement of human rightsThis study received approval from the Virginia Tech’s Institutional Review Board, and all participants provided informed consent to participant in the study.Notes1 In the original RCT (Ollendick et al., Citation2019) in addition to the above-mentioned age range, inclusion criteria for the original study included: (1) a diagnosis of SAD via clinical interview; (2) an FSIQ of 80+; (3) stable psychotropic medication and; (4) no current treatment for social-anxiety related difficulties.