区块链技术在外贸管理中的应用:哪个区块链更适合?

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Yunus Emre Topcu, İbrahim Enes Can, Atilla Özçınar
{"title":"区块链技术在外贸管理中的应用:哪个区块链更适合?","authors":"Yunus Emre Topcu, İbrahim Enes Can, Atilla Özçınar","doi":"10.1108/dprg-05-2023-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to determine the order of importance of blockchain technology gains for foreign trade management. The second aim of the research is to select the most suitable blockchain type for the foreign trade process. Design/methodology/approach The data required for the research analysis were collected through comparison matrices scored by foreign trade experts. The data were analyzed with the analytical hierarchy process method, and the gains of blockchain technology for the foreign trade process were prioritized. Finally, the most suitable type of blockchain technology was selected with the PROMETHEE method. Findings As a result of the study, subject matter experts perceived that the most critical blockchain gain for the foreign trade process would be cost savings. In addition, it has been observed that the general trade process differs compared to the logistics and payment processes. Finally, open blockchain was the most suitable blockchain type for foreign trade processes. Research limitations/implications In this study, the positive gains of blockchain technology are considered. In future studies, it is recommended to consider the existing negative factors to be able to use blockchain technology in foreign trade processes. In addition, it is suggested to conduct a study by dividing foreign trade into two, import and export. Practical implications All stakeholders who want to integrate blockchain technology into their foreign trade processes, including foreign trade companies, software developers, policymakers and international institutions, can benefit from the results of this study. A blockchain technology software created for foreign trade management can be shaped according to the results of this study. Originality/value Although the gains that blockchain technology provides to foreign trade processes are frequently emphasized in the literature, which gain would be greater has not been examined. The lack of an answer to the issue of how blockchain technology should be designed for foreign trade processes has been the missing part of the relevant literature. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first experimental study in the literature that prioritizes blockchain gains and selects the appropriate blockchain type for foreign trade processes.","PeriodicalId":56357,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blockchain technology in foreign trade management: which blockchain alternative is more suitable?\",\"authors\":\"Yunus Emre Topcu, İbrahim Enes Can, Atilla Özçınar\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dprg-05-2023-0064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This study aims to determine the order of importance of blockchain technology gains for foreign trade management. The second aim of the research is to select the most suitable blockchain type for the foreign trade process. Design/methodology/approach The data required for the research analysis were collected through comparison matrices scored by foreign trade experts. The data were analyzed with the analytical hierarchy process method, and the gains of blockchain technology for the foreign trade process were prioritized. Finally, the most suitable type of blockchain technology was selected with the PROMETHEE method. Findings As a result of the study, subject matter experts perceived that the most critical blockchain gain for the foreign trade process would be cost savings. In addition, it has been observed that the general trade process differs compared to the logistics and payment processes. Finally, open blockchain was the most suitable blockchain type for foreign trade processes. Research limitations/implications In this study, the positive gains of blockchain technology are considered. In future studies, it is recommended to consider the existing negative factors to be able to use blockchain technology in foreign trade processes. In addition, it is suggested to conduct a study by dividing foreign trade into two, import and export. Practical implications All stakeholders who want to integrate blockchain technology into their foreign trade processes, including foreign trade companies, software developers, policymakers and international institutions, can benefit from the results of this study. A blockchain technology software created for foreign trade management can be shaped according to the results of this study. Originality/value Although the gains that blockchain technology provides to foreign trade processes are frequently emphasized in the literature, which gain would be greater has not been examined. The lack of an answer to the issue of how blockchain technology should be designed for foreign trade processes has been the missing part of the relevant literature. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first experimental study in the literature that prioritizes blockchain gains and selects the appropriate blockchain type for foreign trade processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-05-2023-0064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-05-2023-0064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定区块链技术收益对外贸管理的重要性排序。研究的第二个目的是为外贸过程选择最合适的区块链类型。研究分析所需的数据是通过外贸专家打分的比较矩阵来收集的。采用层次分析法对数据进行分析,优先考虑区块链技术在外贸过程中的收益。最后,采用PROMETHEE方法选择最合适的区块链技术类型。作为这项研究的结果,主题专家认为,区块链对外贸过程最关键的好处将是节省成本。此外,据观察,一般贸易过程与物流和支付过程不同。最后,开放区块链是最适合外贸流程的区块链类型。在本研究中,考虑了区块链技术的积极收益。在未来的研究中,建议考虑现有的负面因素,以便能够在外贸流程中使用区块链技术。此外,建议将对外贸易分为进口和出口两部分进行研究。所有希望将区块链技术整合到外贸流程中的利益相关者,包括外贸公司、软件开发商、政策制定者和国际机构,都可以从本研究的结果中受益。根据本研究的结果,可以塑造为外贸管理创建的区块链技术软件。虽然文献中经常强调区块链技术为外贸过程提供的收益,但尚未研究哪种收益会更大。对于如何为外贸流程设计区块链技术这一问题,缺乏答案一直是相关文献中缺失的部分。据作者所知,这项研究是文献中第一个优先考虑区块链收益并为外贸流程选择适当区块链类型的实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blockchain technology in foreign trade management: which blockchain alternative is more suitable?
Purpose This study aims to determine the order of importance of blockchain technology gains for foreign trade management. The second aim of the research is to select the most suitable blockchain type for the foreign trade process. Design/methodology/approach The data required for the research analysis were collected through comparison matrices scored by foreign trade experts. The data were analyzed with the analytical hierarchy process method, and the gains of blockchain technology for the foreign trade process were prioritized. Finally, the most suitable type of blockchain technology was selected with the PROMETHEE method. Findings As a result of the study, subject matter experts perceived that the most critical blockchain gain for the foreign trade process would be cost savings. In addition, it has been observed that the general trade process differs compared to the logistics and payment processes. Finally, open blockchain was the most suitable blockchain type for foreign trade processes. Research limitations/implications In this study, the positive gains of blockchain technology are considered. In future studies, it is recommended to consider the existing negative factors to be able to use blockchain technology in foreign trade processes. In addition, it is suggested to conduct a study by dividing foreign trade into two, import and export. Practical implications All stakeholders who want to integrate blockchain technology into their foreign trade processes, including foreign trade companies, software developers, policymakers and international institutions, can benefit from the results of this study. A blockchain technology software created for foreign trade management can be shaped according to the results of this study. Originality/value Although the gains that blockchain technology provides to foreign trade processes are frequently emphasized in the literature, which gain would be greater has not been examined. The lack of an answer to the issue of how blockchain technology should be designed for foreign trade processes has been the missing part of the relevant literature. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first experimental study in the literature that prioritizes blockchain gains and selects the appropriate blockchain type for foreign trade processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance
Digital Policy Regulation and Governance INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Emerald holds journals from the current and previous year. We hold all older back volumes and can supply high quality reprints for most volumes that were previously out-of-print. Complete list of titles we can supply from this publisher Publisher''s web page and subscription information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信