Olaia Fontal, Marta Martínez-Rodríguez, Silvia García-Ceballos
{"title":"教育维度作为遗产管理中的一个新兴话题:绘制科学生产,1991-2022","authors":"Olaia Fontal, Marta Martínez-Rodríguez, Silvia García-Ceballos","doi":"10.3390/heritage6110372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heritage is increasingly present in educational discourses, yet research on heritage education still lacks literature overviews that identify trends in its scientific production worldwide in order to get to know the discipline’s advances, evolution, and impact. This article collected a bibliographic review of n = 223 documents indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science between 1991 and 2022. The analysis was carried out in two phases. During the first phase, distance-based maps were constructed using the VOSviewer 1.6.16 software. During the second phase, a systematic review was carried out based on methodological classification and a content analysis. The study identified thematic networks of (C1) heritage education in formal education, (C2) heritage education, cultural heritage, and educational innovation, (C3) archaeological heritage education, (C4) heritage education, case studies, and historical awareness, and (C5) heritage education, and classified research genealogies and methodologies, which, in turn, led to the definition of two emerging genealogies: teacher training and instrumental, which were added to re-conceptualizing, contextual didactic, and evaluative, and ultimately identified a predominantly qualitative methodology. A classification of the methodologies, methods, and techniques of heritage education research was also made. This study constitutes a clear and pioneering contribution to our understanding of this discipline.","PeriodicalId":12934,"journal":{"name":"Heritage","volume":" 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Educational Dimension as an Emergent Topic in the Management of Heritage: Mapping Scientific Production, 1991–2022\",\"authors\":\"Olaia Fontal, Marta Martínez-Rodríguez, Silvia García-Ceballos\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/heritage6110372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Heritage is increasingly present in educational discourses, yet research on heritage education still lacks literature overviews that identify trends in its scientific production worldwide in order to get to know the discipline’s advances, evolution, and impact. This article collected a bibliographic review of n = 223 documents indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science between 1991 and 2022. The analysis was carried out in two phases. During the first phase, distance-based maps were constructed using the VOSviewer 1.6.16 software. During the second phase, a systematic review was carried out based on methodological classification and a content analysis. The study identified thematic networks of (C1) heritage education in formal education, (C2) heritage education, cultural heritage, and educational innovation, (C3) archaeological heritage education, (C4) heritage education, case studies, and historical awareness, and (C5) heritage education, and classified research genealogies and methodologies, which, in turn, led to the definition of two emerging genealogies: teacher training and instrumental, which were added to re-conceptualizing, contextual didactic, and evaluative, and ultimately identified a predominantly qualitative methodology. A classification of the methodologies, methods, and techniques of heritage education research was also made. This study constitutes a clear and pioneering contribution to our understanding of this discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heritage\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6110372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6110372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
遗产越来越多地出现在教育话语中,但关于遗产教育的研究仍然缺乏文献综述,以确定其在世界范围内的科学生产趋势,以便了解该学科的进步、演变和影响。本文收集了1991年至2022年间在Scopus和Web of Science中索引的n = 223篇文献的书目综述。分析分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,使用VOSviewer 1.6.16软件构建基于距离的地图。在第二阶段,在方法分类和内容分析的基础上进行系统综述。研究确定了(C1)正规教育中的遗产教育、(C2)遗产教育、文化遗产与教育创新、(C3)考古遗产教育、(C4)遗产教育、案例研究与历史意识、(C5)遗产教育的专题网络,并对研究谱系和方法进行了分类,进而定义了两个新兴谱系:教师培训和工具性,这些内容被添加到重新概念化,情境教学和评估中,并最终确定了一种主要的定性方法。对遗产教育研究的方法论、方法和技术进行了分类。这项研究对我们对这一学科的理解做出了明确而开创性的贡献。
The Educational Dimension as an Emergent Topic in the Management of Heritage: Mapping Scientific Production, 1991–2022
Heritage is increasingly present in educational discourses, yet research on heritage education still lacks literature overviews that identify trends in its scientific production worldwide in order to get to know the discipline’s advances, evolution, and impact. This article collected a bibliographic review of n = 223 documents indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science between 1991 and 2022. The analysis was carried out in two phases. During the first phase, distance-based maps were constructed using the VOSviewer 1.6.16 software. During the second phase, a systematic review was carried out based on methodological classification and a content analysis. The study identified thematic networks of (C1) heritage education in formal education, (C2) heritage education, cultural heritage, and educational innovation, (C3) archaeological heritage education, (C4) heritage education, case studies, and historical awareness, and (C5) heritage education, and classified research genealogies and methodologies, which, in turn, led to the definition of two emerging genealogies: teacher training and instrumental, which were added to re-conceptualizing, contextual didactic, and evaluative, and ultimately identified a predominantly qualitative methodology. A classification of the methodologies, methods, and techniques of heritage education research was also made. This study constitutes a clear and pioneering contribution to our understanding of this discipline.