签署投票请愿书对投票率的影响

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Samuel Franklin Harper
{"title":"签署投票请愿书对投票率的影响","authors":"Samuel Franklin Harper","doi":"10.1080/17457289.2023.2281374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDo ballot initiatives increase voter turnout? Some studies find a strong impact while others find the relationship to be modest and/or conditional. Either way, the underlying mechanism is not well understood. Here, we build on past work by hypothesizing that signing a ballot petition acts as a personalized form of campaign contact, increasing the likelihood of turnout. Previous investigations have been aggregate in nature, or have had to rely on either samples of petition signers or county-level inferences. We procured the complete lists of initiative petitions signers for two recent, high-profile state ballot measures in Arkansas, among the most frequent direct democracy users among the American states. By supplementing these individual-level data with the state voter file, we assess the impact of having signed a petition, controlling for age and vote history. Our results confirm earlier findings that signing a petition increases the probability of voter turnout, especially among irregular voters. This has consequences for both candidate and initiative elections in jurisdictions that, like Arkansas, conduct both elections at the same time. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Still other thinkers have hypothesized a role for ideology in the initiative-turnout relationship. Popularly-initiated same-sex marriage bans and marijuana-legalization measures, for example, have been said to have energized conservative and progressive turnout, respectively (e.g., Smith, DeSantis, and Kassel Citation2006). However, Biggers (Citation2014) finds no evidence that such measures increased turnout for any particular group, nor were there marked turnout increases among voters generally perceived as being concerned with moral issues, such as poorer, older, or fundamentalist Christian voters.2 The 2014 minimum-wage initiative was “An Act to Increase the Arkansas Minimum Wage.” The measure gradually increased the state’s minimum wage from $6.25 an hour to $8.50 an hour by 2017 (UADA Public Policy Center Citation2014). The 2016 marijuana initiative was “The Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment of 2016,” and stood to legalize the medical use of cannabis in the State of Arkansas (UADA Public Policy Center Citation2016).3 Arkansas law establishes the minimum number of signers for a petition to be put to vote as eight percent of the number of voters in the last gubernatorial election for initiated acts. The 2014 petition therefore required 62,547 signatures (eight percent of the 2010 election), and the 2016 petition, a constitutional amendment, required 67,887 (eight percent of the 2014 election).4 To test the robustness of these models, we conducted four additional analyses with controls for county-level percent Black and Hispanic and county median income. The results of these models are reported in the appendix and do not affect the robustness of the individual-level-only models.5 We estimate marginal effects for continuous variables as the difference in predicted probability shifting the variable two standard deviations across the mean (i.e. x̄ ± σ).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by University of Arkansas.","PeriodicalId":46791,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties","volume":" 92","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of signing ballot petitions on turnout\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Franklin Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17457289.2023.2281374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTDo ballot initiatives increase voter turnout? Some studies find a strong impact while others find the relationship to be modest and/or conditional. Either way, the underlying mechanism is not well understood. Here, we build on past work by hypothesizing that signing a ballot petition acts as a personalized form of campaign contact, increasing the likelihood of turnout. Previous investigations have been aggregate in nature, or have had to rely on either samples of petition signers or county-level inferences. We procured the complete lists of initiative petitions signers for two recent, high-profile state ballot measures in Arkansas, among the most frequent direct democracy users among the American states. By supplementing these individual-level data with the state voter file, we assess the impact of having signed a petition, controlling for age and vote history. Our results confirm earlier findings that signing a petition increases the probability of voter turnout, especially among irregular voters. This has consequences for both candidate and initiative elections in jurisdictions that, like Arkansas, conduct both elections at the same time. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Still other thinkers have hypothesized a role for ideology in the initiative-turnout relationship. Popularly-initiated same-sex marriage bans and marijuana-legalization measures, for example, have been said to have energized conservative and progressive turnout, respectively (e.g., Smith, DeSantis, and Kassel Citation2006). However, Biggers (Citation2014) finds no evidence that such measures increased turnout for any particular group, nor were there marked turnout increases among voters generally perceived as being concerned with moral issues, such as poorer, older, or fundamentalist Christian voters.2 The 2014 minimum-wage initiative was “An Act to Increase the Arkansas Minimum Wage.” The measure gradually increased the state’s minimum wage from $6.25 an hour to $8.50 an hour by 2017 (UADA Public Policy Center Citation2014). The 2016 marijuana initiative was “The Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment of 2016,” and stood to legalize the medical use of cannabis in the State of Arkansas (UADA Public Policy Center Citation2016).3 Arkansas law establishes the minimum number of signers for a petition to be put to vote as eight percent of the number of voters in the last gubernatorial election for initiated acts. The 2014 petition therefore required 62,547 signatures (eight percent of the 2010 election), and the 2016 petition, a constitutional amendment, required 67,887 (eight percent of the 2014 election).4 To test the robustness of these models, we conducted four additional analyses with controls for county-level percent Black and Hispanic and county median income. The results of these models are reported in the appendix and do not affect the robustness of the individual-level-only models.5 We estimate marginal effects for continuous variables as the difference in predicted probability shifting the variable two standard deviations across the mean (i.e. x̄ ± σ).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by University of Arkansas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties\",\"volume\":\" 92\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2023.2281374\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2023.2281374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要投票倡议会增加选民投票率吗?一些研究发现了强烈的影响,而另一些研究发现这种关系是适度的和/或有条件的。不管怎样,潜在的机制都没有被很好地理解。在这里,我们以过去的工作为基础,假设在投票请愿书上签名是一种个性化的竞选联系形式,增加了投票率的可能性。以前的调查本质上是汇总的,或者不得不依赖于请愿签名者的样本或县级的推断。我们获得了阿肯色州最近两项引人注目的州投票措施的倡议请愿签名者的完整名单,阿肯色州是美国最经常使用直接民主的州之一。通过用州选民档案补充这些个人层面的数据,我们评估了签署请愿书的影响,控制了年龄和投票历史。我们的研究结果证实了先前的发现,即在请愿书上签名会增加选民投票率的可能性,尤其是在非正规选民中。在像阿肯色州这样同时进行候选人选举和倡议选举的司法管辖区,这对候选人和倡议选举都有影响。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1还有一些思想家假设了意识形态在主动性-投票率关系中的作用。例如,普遍发起的同性婚姻禁令和大麻合法化措施,据说分别激发了保守派和进步派的投票率(例如,Smith、DeSantis和Kassel Citation2006)。然而,Biggers (Citation2014)没有发现任何证据表明这些措施增加了任何特定群体的投票率,也没有明显的投票率增加通常被认为是关心道德问题的选民,如穷人、老年人或原教旨主义基督徒选民2014年的最低工资倡议是“提高阿肯色州最低工资法案”。该措施逐步将该州的最低工资从每小时6.25美元提高到2017年的每小时8.50美元(UADA公共政策中心引文2014)。2 . 2016年的大麻倡议是“2016年阿肯色州医用大麻修正案”,主张在阿肯色州将大麻的医疗用途合法化(UADA公共政策中心引文2016)阿肯色州法律规定,提交投票的请愿书的最低签名人数为上次州长选举中发起法案的选民人数的8%。因此,2014年的请愿书需要62547个签名(占2010年选举的8%),2016年的请愿书是一项宪法修正案,需要67887个签名(占2014年选举的8%)为了测试这些模型的稳健性,我们进行了四个额外的分析,控制了县一级的黑人和西班牙裔百分比和县的中位数收入。这些模型的结果在附录中报告,并且不影响仅限个人水平的模型的稳健性我们将连续变量的边际效应估计为变量在平均值上移动两个标准差的预测概率之差(即x′±σ)。本研究得到了阿肯色大学的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of signing ballot petitions on turnout
ABSTRACTDo ballot initiatives increase voter turnout? Some studies find a strong impact while others find the relationship to be modest and/or conditional. Either way, the underlying mechanism is not well understood. Here, we build on past work by hypothesizing that signing a ballot petition acts as a personalized form of campaign contact, increasing the likelihood of turnout. Previous investigations have been aggregate in nature, or have had to rely on either samples of petition signers or county-level inferences. We procured the complete lists of initiative petitions signers for two recent, high-profile state ballot measures in Arkansas, among the most frequent direct democracy users among the American states. By supplementing these individual-level data with the state voter file, we assess the impact of having signed a petition, controlling for age and vote history. Our results confirm earlier findings that signing a petition increases the probability of voter turnout, especially among irregular voters. This has consequences for both candidate and initiative elections in jurisdictions that, like Arkansas, conduct both elections at the same time. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Still other thinkers have hypothesized a role for ideology in the initiative-turnout relationship. Popularly-initiated same-sex marriage bans and marijuana-legalization measures, for example, have been said to have energized conservative and progressive turnout, respectively (e.g., Smith, DeSantis, and Kassel Citation2006). However, Biggers (Citation2014) finds no evidence that such measures increased turnout for any particular group, nor were there marked turnout increases among voters generally perceived as being concerned with moral issues, such as poorer, older, or fundamentalist Christian voters.2 The 2014 minimum-wage initiative was “An Act to Increase the Arkansas Minimum Wage.” The measure gradually increased the state’s minimum wage from $6.25 an hour to $8.50 an hour by 2017 (UADA Public Policy Center Citation2014). The 2016 marijuana initiative was “The Arkansas Medical Marijuana Amendment of 2016,” and stood to legalize the medical use of cannabis in the State of Arkansas (UADA Public Policy Center Citation2016).3 Arkansas law establishes the minimum number of signers for a petition to be put to vote as eight percent of the number of voters in the last gubernatorial election for initiated acts. The 2014 petition therefore required 62,547 signatures (eight percent of the 2010 election), and the 2016 petition, a constitutional amendment, required 67,887 (eight percent of the 2014 election).4 To test the robustness of these models, we conducted four additional analyses with controls for county-level percent Black and Hispanic and county median income. The results of these models are reported in the appendix and do not affect the robustness of the individual-level-only models.5 We estimate marginal effects for continuous variables as the difference in predicted probability shifting the variable two standard deviations across the mean (i.e. x̄ ± σ).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by University of Arkansas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信