征文:游戏,一个游戏化的工具,为工科学生的科学写作教学

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Rosa Núñez-Pacheco, Elizabeth Vidal Duarte, Osbaldo Turpo-Gebera, Eveling Castro-Gutiérrez
{"title":"征文:游戏,一个游戏化的工具,为工科学生的科学写作教学","authors":"Rosa Núñez-Pacheco, Elizabeth Vidal Duarte, Osbaldo Turpo-Gebera, Eveling Castro-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.37467/revhuman.v21.5067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the evaluation of the alpha version of a gamified tool called Call for Papers: The Game (CfP:TG), specially designed for teaching scientific writing in the training of future engineers. A non-probabilistic convenience sampling was carried out with the participation of engineering students from a Peruvian public university. The short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) was applied, and usability was qualitatively evaluated. The main results indicate that the Pragmatic Quality of CfP:TG is in the neutral range with a value of 0.729, and the Hedonic Quality receives a positive evaluation with a value of 1.089.","PeriodicalId":36097,"journal":{"name":"Human Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Call for Papers: The Game, a Gamified Tool for Teaching Scientific Writing in Engineering Students\",\"authors\":\"Rosa Núñez-Pacheco, Elizabeth Vidal Duarte, Osbaldo Turpo-Gebera, Eveling Castro-Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.37467/revhuman.v21.5067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the evaluation of the alpha version of a gamified tool called Call for Papers: The Game (CfP:TG), specially designed for teaching scientific writing in the training of future engineers. A non-probabilistic convenience sampling was carried out with the participation of engineering students from a Peruvian public university. The short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) was applied, and usability was qualitatively evaluated. The main results indicate that the Pragmatic Quality of CfP:TG is in the neutral range with a value of 0.729, and the Hedonic Quality receives a positive evaluation with a value of 1.089.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v21.5067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v21.5067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了对游戏化工具的alpha版本的评估,该工具名为“论文征集:游戏”(CfP:TG),专门用于在培训未来工程师时教授科学写作。在秘鲁一所公立大学的工科学生的参与下,进行了非概率方便抽样。采用用户体验问卷(UEQ)的简化版,对可用性进行定性评价。主要结果表明,CfP:TG的语用质量处于中性范围,评价值为0.729,而享乐质量得到了积极评价,评价值为1.089。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Call for Papers: The Game, a Gamified Tool for Teaching Scientific Writing in Engineering Students
This paper presents the evaluation of the alpha version of a gamified tool called Call for Papers: The Game (CfP:TG), specially designed for teaching scientific writing in the training of future engineers. A non-probabilistic convenience sampling was carried out with the participation of engineering students from a Peruvian public university. The short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ) was applied, and usability was qualitatively evaluated. The main results indicate that the Pragmatic Quality of CfP:TG is in the neutral range with a value of 0.729, and the Hedonic Quality receives a positive evaluation with a value of 1.089.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Review
Human Review Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信