三级模型中的TC世界

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Stephen T. Garner
{"title":"三级模型中的TC世界","authors":"Stephen T. Garner","doi":"10.1175/jas-d-22-0089.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Three-level and thee-layer models of tropical cyclones (TCs) have provided a more conceptual view of TC dynamics than conventional numerical models. They have been purpose-built, with special treatments of boundary layers and/or convection. We show that a further simplification with minimal parameterization and a seamless connection to higher resolution captures TCs about as well. The framework of radiative–convective equilibrium avoids ambiguities from temporal and spatial boundaries. For the TCs, the minimal grid provides one level for outflow and one level for most of the inflow. A version with 10 levels is used for comparison. For the same average pressure intensity, the wind field is slightly broader around the three-level vortices, with stronger subsidence in the core and 25% more mass and moisture flux. However, thermodynamic efficiency, mechanical efficiency, and TC counts are about the same. Across runs with different surface temperatures and cooling rates, global energy scaling makes reasonable predictions of the maximum velocity allowing for variations in the effective forcing/dissipation area and surface humidity. TC count is inconsistent with theories for size as a function of Coriolis parameter. An overturning circuit is isolated within a composite vortex and analyzed using energy and entropy budgets to mirror analytical models. Effective radiation and dissipation temperatures are less extreme than often assumed in such models, yielding a smaller thermodynamic efficiency near the global value of ∼0.1. The pressure deficit arises mostly from inflow enthalpy increase, as expected, but dissipation reduces the contribution from an outflow pressure increase. The influence of ambient CAPE makes up most of the difference.","PeriodicalId":17231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","volume":"140 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TC Worlds in a Three-Level Model\",\"authors\":\"Stephen T. Garner\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jas-d-22-0089.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Three-level and thee-layer models of tropical cyclones (TCs) have provided a more conceptual view of TC dynamics than conventional numerical models. They have been purpose-built, with special treatments of boundary layers and/or convection. We show that a further simplification with minimal parameterization and a seamless connection to higher resolution captures TCs about as well. The framework of radiative–convective equilibrium avoids ambiguities from temporal and spatial boundaries. For the TCs, the minimal grid provides one level for outflow and one level for most of the inflow. A version with 10 levels is used for comparison. For the same average pressure intensity, the wind field is slightly broader around the three-level vortices, with stronger subsidence in the core and 25% more mass and moisture flux. However, thermodynamic efficiency, mechanical efficiency, and TC counts are about the same. Across runs with different surface temperatures and cooling rates, global energy scaling makes reasonable predictions of the maximum velocity allowing for variations in the effective forcing/dissipation area and surface humidity. TC count is inconsistent with theories for size as a function of Coriolis parameter. An overturning circuit is isolated within a composite vortex and analyzed using energy and entropy budgets to mirror analytical models. Effective radiation and dissipation temperatures are less extreme than often assumed in such models, yielding a smaller thermodynamic efficiency near the global value of ∼0.1. The pressure deficit arises mostly from inflow enthalpy increase, as expected, but dissipation reduces the contribution from an outflow pressure increase. The influence of ambient CAPE makes up most of the difference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences\",\"volume\":\"140 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-22-0089.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-22-0089.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热带气旋的三层和三层模式提供了比传统数值模式更概念化的热带气旋动力学视图。它们是专门建造的,对边界层和/或对流进行了特殊处理。我们表明,通过最小参数化和无缝连接到更高分辨率的进一步简化也可以捕获tc。辐射对流平衡的框架避免了时间和空间边界的模糊性。对于tc,最小网格为流出提供一层,为大部分流入提供一层。使用10个级别的版本进行比较。在相同的平均压力强度下,三水平涡周围的风场略宽,核心下沉更强,质量和水分通量增加25%。然而,热力学效率,机械效率,和TC计数是差不多的。在不同的地表温度和冷却速率下,全球能量标度可以合理地预测最大速度,考虑到有效强迫/消散面积和地表湿度的变化。TC计数与大小作为科里奥利参数函数的理论不一致。一个翻转电路被隔离在一个复合涡旋和分析使用能量和熵预算,以反映分析模型。有效辐射和耗散温度不像在这种模式中通常假设的那样极端,在全球值约0.1附近产生较小的热力学效率。正如预期的那样,压力赤字主要是由流入焓增加引起的,但耗散减少了流出压力增加的贡献。环境CAPE的影响弥补了大部分差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TC Worlds in a Three-Level Model
Abstract Three-level and thee-layer models of tropical cyclones (TCs) have provided a more conceptual view of TC dynamics than conventional numerical models. They have been purpose-built, with special treatments of boundary layers and/or convection. We show that a further simplification with minimal parameterization and a seamless connection to higher resolution captures TCs about as well. The framework of radiative–convective equilibrium avoids ambiguities from temporal and spatial boundaries. For the TCs, the minimal grid provides one level for outflow and one level for most of the inflow. A version with 10 levels is used for comparison. For the same average pressure intensity, the wind field is slightly broader around the three-level vortices, with stronger subsidence in the core and 25% more mass and moisture flux. However, thermodynamic efficiency, mechanical efficiency, and TC counts are about the same. Across runs with different surface temperatures and cooling rates, global energy scaling makes reasonable predictions of the maximum velocity allowing for variations in the effective forcing/dissipation area and surface humidity. TC count is inconsistent with theories for size as a function of Coriolis parameter. An overturning circuit is isolated within a composite vortex and analyzed using energy and entropy budgets to mirror analytical models. Effective radiation and dissipation temperatures are less extreme than often assumed in such models, yielding a smaller thermodynamic efficiency near the global value of ∼0.1. The pressure deficit arises mostly from inflow enthalpy increase, as expected, but dissipation reduces the contribution from an outflow pressure increase. The influence of ambient CAPE makes up most of the difference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (JAS) publishes basic research related to the physics, dynamics, and chemistry of the atmosphere of Earth and other planets, with emphasis on the quantitative and deductive aspects of the subject. The links provide detailed information for readers, authors, reviewers, and those who wish to submit a manuscript for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信