{"title":"碳税的合法性分析——以哈贝马斯的合法性理论为视角","authors":"","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.020906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legality of carbon tariffs has been highly controversial since their inception. Habermas's discussion legitimation theory believes that the legitimacy of a rule depends on three requirements: the acceptability of its value, the legality of the rule itself, and intersubjectivity. The existing carbon tariff rules do not meet the above three requirements at the same time, so they are not legal, but they may have legality in the future. When designing a system, it can be permitted if it meets the above requirements.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the legitimacy of carbon tariffs—from the perspective of Habermas's legitimacy theory\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.23977/law.2023.020906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The legality of carbon tariffs has been highly controversial since their inception. Habermas's discussion legitimation theory believes that the legitimacy of a rule depends on three requirements: the acceptability of its value, the legality of the rule itself, and intersubjectivity. The existing carbon tariff rules do not meet the above three requirements at the same time, so they are not legal, but they may have legality in the future. When designing a system, it can be permitted if it meets the above requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of the legitimacy of carbon tariffs—from the perspective of Habermas's legitimacy theory
The legality of carbon tariffs has been highly controversial since their inception. Habermas's discussion legitimation theory believes that the legitimacy of a rule depends on three requirements: the acceptability of its value, the legality of the rule itself, and intersubjectivity. The existing carbon tariff rules do not meet the above three requirements at the same time, so they are not legal, but they may have legality in the future. When designing a system, it can be permitted if it meets the above requirements.