替代含铅黄铜合金的环保型低铅与无铅黄铜合金的加工性能比较研究

IF 0.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nima ZOGHIPOUR
{"title":"替代含铅黄铜合金的环保型低铅与无铅黄铜合金的加工性能比较研究","authors":"Nima ZOGHIPOUR","doi":"10.14744/sigma.2023.00107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of brass alloys in pipelines and other fluid-carrying systems is widely recognized. The rolled or extruded bars are often machined to produce the manufactured products from these materials. When incredible machinability is required, leaded brasses are frequently employed. Leaded brass usage is prohibited, nevertheless, in systems that deal with environmental and human health hazards. In this study, three types of available brasses in EUA7038 (Brass for European Potable Water Applications List) leaded (CW617N), low-leaded (CW511L) and lead-free (CW724R) brasses haves been taken into consideration in terms of machinability; cutting forces, entry and exit burr height, subsurface microhardness, and microstructures. Experiments have been performed using several levels of feed and cutting speed on the mentioned materials during drilling tests. According to the obtained results, compared to leaded brass materials, low-leaded and lead-free brass materials showed more subsurface deformation. CW511L displays a sharper amendment rate of the in both entry and exit burr height with an increase in feed compared to CW724R and CW617N. It is significant to note that the machinability values for CW511L, CW724R, and CW617N are 1.4, 1.8, and 1.95 times, respectively.","PeriodicalId":45000,"journal":{"name":"Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences-Sigma Muhendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study on the machining performance of eco-friendly low-lead and lead-free brass alloys in replacement for leaded ones\",\"authors\":\"Nima ZOGHIPOUR\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/sigma.2023.00107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of brass alloys in pipelines and other fluid-carrying systems is widely recognized. The rolled or extruded bars are often machined to produce the manufactured products from these materials. When incredible machinability is required, leaded brasses are frequently employed. Leaded brass usage is prohibited, nevertheless, in systems that deal with environmental and human health hazards. In this study, three types of available brasses in EUA7038 (Brass for European Potable Water Applications List) leaded (CW617N), low-leaded (CW511L) and lead-free (CW724R) brasses haves been taken into consideration in terms of machinability; cutting forces, entry and exit burr height, subsurface microhardness, and microstructures. Experiments have been performed using several levels of feed and cutting speed on the mentioned materials during drilling tests. According to the obtained results, compared to leaded brass materials, low-leaded and lead-free brass materials showed more subsurface deformation. CW511L displays a sharper amendment rate of the in both entry and exit burr height with an increase in feed compared to CW724R and CW617N. It is significant to note that the machinability values for CW511L, CW724R, and CW617N are 1.4, 1.8, and 1.95 times, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences-Sigma Muhendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences-Sigma Muhendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2023.00107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences-Sigma Muhendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2023.00107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study on the machining performance of eco-friendly low-lead and lead-free brass alloys in replacement for leaded ones
The use of brass alloys in pipelines and other fluid-carrying systems is widely recognized. The rolled or extruded bars are often machined to produce the manufactured products from these materials. When incredible machinability is required, leaded brasses are frequently employed. Leaded brass usage is prohibited, nevertheless, in systems that deal with environmental and human health hazards. In this study, three types of available brasses in EUA7038 (Brass for European Potable Water Applications List) leaded (CW617N), low-leaded (CW511L) and lead-free (CW724R) brasses haves been taken into consideration in terms of machinability; cutting forces, entry and exit burr height, subsurface microhardness, and microstructures. Experiments have been performed using several levels of feed and cutting speed on the mentioned materials during drilling tests. According to the obtained results, compared to leaded brass materials, low-leaded and lead-free brass materials showed more subsurface deformation. CW511L displays a sharper amendment rate of the in both entry and exit burr height with an increase in feed compared to CW724R and CW617N. It is significant to note that the machinability values for CW511L, CW724R, and CW617N are 1.4, 1.8, and 1.95 times, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信