某城市污水处理厂的技术经济分析:SBR、MLE和amp的比较A2O工艺

IF 1.4 4区工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Scientia Iranica Pub Date : 2023-10-09 DOI:10.24200/sci.2023.61323.7250

Alireza Rabani mehr, Hasan Nikkhah, Mehrdad Farhadian

{"title":"某城市污水处理厂的技术经济分析:SBR、MLE和amp的比较A2O工艺","authors":"Alireza Rabani mehr, Hasan Nikkhah, Mehrdad Farhadian","doi":"10.24200/sci.2023.61323.7250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sequencing batch reactor (SBR), modified Ludzak Ettinger (MLE), and anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O), were modeled and simulated using the data of the Konarak-Iran wastewater treatment plant. GPS-X and CapdetWorks software were used for technical and economic evaluation, respectively. The cost of MLE treatment per cubic meter of effluent with a flow rate of 900 cubic meters per day was $ 0.96 per cubic meter, which was 36.4% and 12.5% lower than SBR and A2O, respectively. The removal efficiency of pollutants using the A2O method was above 90%, which has the best efficiency compared to the other two methods. However, since the quality of the effluent is also met by the MLE method, the choice of the same method can be desirable. Therefore, modeling and technical and economic simulation of wastewater treatment to perform comparisons between different methods lead to better engineering decisions based on the cost and quality of effluent.","PeriodicalId":21605,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Iranica","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic analysis of a municipal wastewater treatment plant: A comparison among SBR, MLE & A2O Processes\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Rabani mehr, Hasan Nikkhah, Mehrdad Farhadian\",\"doi\":\"10.24200/sci.2023.61323.7250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sequencing batch reactor (SBR), modified Ludzak Ettinger (MLE), and anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O), were modeled and simulated using the data of the Konarak-Iran wastewater treatment plant. GPS-X and CapdetWorks software were used for technical and economic evaluation, respectively. The cost of MLE treatment per cubic meter of effluent with a flow rate of 900 cubic meters per day was $ 0.96 per cubic meter, which was 36.4% and 12.5% lower than SBR and A2O, respectively. The removal efficiency of pollutants using the A2O method was above 90%, which has the best efficiency compared to the other two methods. However, since the quality of the effluent is also met by the MLE method, the choice of the same method can be desirable. Therefore, modeling and technical and economic simulation of wastewater treatment to perform comparisons between different methods lead to better engineering decisions based on the cost and quality of effluent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Iranica\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Iranica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2023.61323.7250\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Iranica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2023.61323.7250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

采用科纳拉克-伊朗污水处理厂的数据，对序批式反应器(SBR)、改良Ludzak Ettinger反应器(MLE)和厌氧/缺氧/好氧反应器(A2O)进行了建模和模拟。采用GPS-X和CapdetWorks软件分别进行技术和经济评价。每日流量为900立方米的污水，MLE处理成本为每立方米0.96元，比SBR和A2O分别低36.4%和12.5%。A2O法对污染物的去除率在90%以上，与其他两种方法相比效率最好。但是，由于MLE方法也能满足出水的质量，因此选择相同的方法是可取的。因此，对污水处理进行建模和技术经济模拟，以在不同方法之间进行比较，从而根据污水的成本和质量做出更好的工程决策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Techno-economic analysis of a municipal wastewater treatment plant: A comparison among SBR, MLE & A2O Processes

Sequencing batch reactor (SBR), modified Ludzak Ettinger (MLE), and anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic (A2O), were modeled and simulated using the data of the Konarak-Iran wastewater treatment plant. GPS-X and CapdetWorks software were used for technical and economic evaluation, respectively. The cost of MLE treatment per cubic meter of effluent with a flow rate of 900 cubic meters per day was $ 0.96 per cubic meter, which was 36.4% and 12.5% lower than SBR and A2O, respectively. The removal efficiency of pollutants using the A2O method was above 90%, which has the best efficiency compared to the other two methods. However, since the quality of the effluent is also met by the MLE method, the choice of the same method can be desirable. Therefore, modeling and technical and economic simulation of wastewater treatment to perform comparisons between different methods lead to better engineering decisions based on the cost and quality of effluent.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Scientia Iranica 工程技术-工程：综合

CiteScore

2.90

自引率

7.10%

发文量

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： The objectives of Scientia Iranica are two-fold. The first is to provide a forum for the presentation of original works by scientists and engineers from around the world. The second is to open an effective channel to enhance the level of communication between scientists and engineers and the exchange of state-of-the-art research and ideas. The scope of the journal is broad and multidisciplinary in technical sciences and engineering. It encompasses theoretical and experimental research. Specific areas include but not limited to chemistry, chemical engineering, civil engineering, control and computer engineering, electrical engineering, material, manufacturing and industrial management, mathematics, mechanical engineering, nuclear engineering, petroleum engineering, physics, nanotechnology.