飞机地面处理过程中机场地勤人员声负荷的卫生评价

Q4 Medicine
Alexander O. Karelin, Olga E. Filipchick, Gennadiy B. Yeremin
{"title":"飞机地面处理过程中机场地勤人员声负荷的卫生评价","authors":"Alexander O. Karelin, Olga E. Filipchick, Gennadiy B. Yeremin","doi":"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-8-796-799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Among the occupational factors having a harmful effect on the body of airport ground staff, noise dominates, the levels of which may exceed normative values. 
 The purpose of the study. To assess the acoustic loads on airport ground staff when working on the platform of a modern airport.
 Materials and methods. Noise measurements at the workplaces of airport ground staff of the profession “Duty “follow me” Driver” (hereinafter referred to as the Duty Driver) were carried out in accordance with GOST ISO 9612–2016. On the basis of the analysis of the working situation and the typical structure of the working day a measurement strategy based on the labour function was adopted. The CENTER 322 noise meter was used to measure the noise.
 Results. The basic duration of the Duty Driver’s working shift is 10.5 hours and the effective duration of the working day in the sector of the installation of the aircraft (AC) at the parking place (PP) is 4 hours. It is revealed that the greatest noise load on the Duty Officer occurs at the time of coordination of the AC on PP. The main and basic sources of noise in this case are the working turbines of the aircraft. The maximum sound pressure levels depended on the type of aircraft and ranged from 91.2 dBA for the Boeing-747 to 111.0 dBA for the AN-26. The equivalent sound pressure level for a 10.5-hour working day was 
 92.3 ± 3.4 dBA, for the effective duration of the working day (4 hours) – 96.5 ± 3.4 dBA. The maximum sound levels for most brands of modern aircraft do not exceed the standard parameters. Equivalent sound pressure levels exceed the established standards by 12.3–16.5 dBA.
 Limitations of the study. Since the Duty Driver was wearing a microphone on himself, there were uncertainties caused by the shielding and reflecting effects of the body.
 Conclusion. Duty Drivers are exposed to noise exceeding hygienic standards. This makes it possible to attribute the workplace of the Duty Officers to the harmful class of working conditions 3.2 according to the acoustic factor and makes it necessary for them to use personal protective equipment against noise when working on the platform.","PeriodicalId":12550,"journal":{"name":"Gigiena i sanitariia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hygienic assessment of the acoustic load on airport ground staff during ground handling of aircrafts\",\"authors\":\"Alexander O. Karelin, Olga E. Filipchick, Gennadiy B. Yeremin\",\"doi\":\"10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-8-796-799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Among the occupational factors having a harmful effect on the body of airport ground staff, noise dominates, the levels of which may exceed normative values. 
 The purpose of the study. To assess the acoustic loads on airport ground staff when working on the platform of a modern airport.
 Materials and methods. Noise measurements at the workplaces of airport ground staff of the profession “Duty “follow me” Driver” (hereinafter referred to as the Duty Driver) were carried out in accordance with GOST ISO 9612–2016. On the basis of the analysis of the working situation and the typical structure of the working day a measurement strategy based on the labour function was adopted. The CENTER 322 noise meter was used to measure the noise.
 Results. The basic duration of the Duty Driver’s working shift is 10.5 hours and the effective duration of the working day in the sector of the installation of the aircraft (AC) at the parking place (PP) is 4 hours. It is revealed that the greatest noise load on the Duty Officer occurs at the time of coordination of the AC on PP. The main and basic sources of noise in this case are the working turbines of the aircraft. The maximum sound pressure levels depended on the type of aircraft and ranged from 91.2 dBA for the Boeing-747 to 111.0 dBA for the AN-26. The equivalent sound pressure level for a 10.5-hour working day was 
 92.3 ± 3.4 dBA, for the effective duration of the working day (4 hours) – 96.5 ± 3.4 dBA. The maximum sound levels for most brands of modern aircraft do not exceed the standard parameters. Equivalent sound pressure levels exceed the established standards by 12.3–16.5 dBA.
 Limitations of the study. Since the Duty Driver was wearing a microphone on himself, there were uncertainties caused by the shielding and reflecting effects of the body.
 Conclusion. Duty Drivers are exposed to noise exceeding hygienic standards. This makes it possible to attribute the workplace of the Duty Officers to the harmful class of working conditions 3.2 according to the acoustic factor and makes it necessary for them to use personal protective equipment against noise when working on the platform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gigiena i sanitariia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gigiena i sanitariia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-8-796-799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gigiena i sanitariia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-8-796-799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。在对机场地勤人员身体产生有害影响的职业因素中,噪音占主导地位,其水平可能超过正常值。& # x0D;研究的目的。评估机场地勤人员在现代机场平台上工作时的声载荷。 材料和方法。按照GOST ISO 9612-2016标准,对“值班”跟我来“司机”职业的机场地勤人员(以下简称“值班司机”)的工作场所进行噪音测量。在分析工作情况和工作日典型结构的基础上,采用了基于劳动函数的测量策略。使用CENTER 322噪声计测量噪声。 结果。值班驾驶员轮班的基本时长为10.5小时,在停机位(PP)安装飞机(AC)扇区的工作日有效时长为4小时。结果表明,值班员的最大噪声负荷发生在飞机上的交流协调时。在这种情况下,主要和基本的噪声源是飞机的工作涡轮。最大声压级取决于飞机的类型,范围从波音747的91.2 dBA到安-26的111.0 dBA。10.5小时工作日的等效声压级为 92.3±3.4 dBA,工作日有效持续时间(4小时)- 96.5±3.4 dBA。大多数品牌的现代飞机的最大声级不超过标准参数。等效声压级超过既定标准12.3-16.5 dBA。本研究的局限性。由于值班司机身上戴着麦克风,因此由于身体的屏蔽和反射作用,存在不确定性。 结论。值班司机暴露在超过卫生标准的噪音中。这使得值班人员的工作场所有可能根据声学因素归为有害工作条件3.2级,并使他们有必要在平台上工作时使用个人防护设备来防止噪音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hygienic assessment of the acoustic load on airport ground staff during ground handling of aircrafts
Introduction. Among the occupational factors having a harmful effect on the body of airport ground staff, noise dominates, the levels of which may exceed normative values. The purpose of the study. To assess the acoustic loads on airport ground staff when working on the platform of a modern airport. Materials and methods. Noise measurements at the workplaces of airport ground staff of the profession “Duty “follow me” Driver” (hereinafter referred to as the Duty Driver) were carried out in accordance with GOST ISO 9612–2016. On the basis of the analysis of the working situation and the typical structure of the working day a measurement strategy based on the labour function was adopted. The CENTER 322 noise meter was used to measure the noise. Results. The basic duration of the Duty Driver’s working shift is 10.5 hours and the effective duration of the working day in the sector of the installation of the aircraft (AC) at the parking place (PP) is 4 hours. It is revealed that the greatest noise load on the Duty Officer occurs at the time of coordination of the AC on PP. The main and basic sources of noise in this case are the working turbines of the aircraft. The maximum sound pressure levels depended on the type of aircraft and ranged from 91.2 dBA for the Boeing-747 to 111.0 dBA for the AN-26. The equivalent sound pressure level for a 10.5-hour working day was 92.3 ± 3.4 dBA, for the effective duration of the working day (4 hours) – 96.5 ± 3.4 dBA. The maximum sound levels for most brands of modern aircraft do not exceed the standard parameters. Equivalent sound pressure levels exceed the established standards by 12.3–16.5 dBA. Limitations of the study. Since the Duty Driver was wearing a microphone on himself, there were uncertainties caused by the shielding and reflecting effects of the body. Conclusion. Duty Drivers are exposed to noise exceeding hygienic standards. This makes it possible to attribute the workplace of the Duty Officers to the harmful class of working conditions 3.2 according to the acoustic factor and makes it necessary for them to use personal protective equipment against noise when working on the platform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gigiena i sanitariia
Gigiena i sanitariia Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信