高压反应和非反应喷雾剂在各种汽油混合物中的实验研究

IF 1 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Ankith Ullal, Bastian Lehnert, Shengrong Zhu, Stephan Révidat, Mark Shirley, Kyoung Pyo Ha, Michael Wensing, Johannes Ullrich
{"title":"高压反应和非反应喷雾剂在各种汽油混合物中的实验研究","authors":"Ankith Ullal, Bastian Lehnert, Shengrong Zhu, Stephan Révidat, Mark Shirley, Kyoung Pyo Ha, Michael Wensing, Johannes Ullrich","doi":"10.4271/04-17-02-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>Research into efficient internal combustion (IC) engines need to continue as the majority of vehicles will still be powered by IC or hybrid powertrains in the foreseeable future. Recently, lean-burn gasoline compression ignition (GCI) with high-pressure direct injection has been receiving considerable attention among the research community due to its ability to improve thermal efficiency and reduce emissions. To maximize GCI benefits in engine efficiency and emissions tradeoff, co-optimization of the combustion system and fuel formation is required. Thus, it is essential to study the spray characteristics of different fuels under engine-like operating conditions. In this work, high-pressure spray characteristics are experimentally studied for three blends of gasoline, namely, Naphtha, E30, and research octane number (RON) 98. A single-hole custom-built injector was used to inject fuel into a constant volume chamber with injection pressure varying from 40 MPa to 100 MPa. The chamber pressure was varied from 4 MPa to 7 MPa. The spray parameters measured were liquid and vapor penetration, liquid and vapor spray plume angle, and spray and flame luminosity area for reacting and non-reacting sprays. The measurement techniques used were shadowgraphy, Schlieren method, and flame luminosity area measurement. Liquid penetration followed the fuel density pattern and was shortest for Naphtha, followed by RON 98 and E30. The increase in injection pressure did not significantly affect liquid penetration, but improved atomization as well as reduced soot intensity. In addition, vapor penetration was increased on account of higher injection velocity and vaporized mass. The higher chamber pressure drastically reduced liquid and vapor penetration on account of increased drag. Compared to non-reacting sprays, vapor penetration and spray plume angle for reacting sprays deviated according to the fuel type. Ignition of the fuel increased vapor penetration and spray plume angle due to the expansion of hot gases. Naphtha ignited the earliest on account of its low RON and high volatility. It had the highest deviation from the corresponding non-reacting case for vapor penetration. RON 98 fuel only showed a slight increase in vapor plume angle indicating the start of reaction, whereas E30 did not show any deviation.</div>","PeriodicalId":21365,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Study of High-Pressure Reacting and Non-reacting Sprays for Various Gasoline Blends\",\"authors\":\"Ankith Ullal, Bastian Lehnert, Shengrong Zhu, Stephan Révidat, Mark Shirley, Kyoung Pyo Ha, Michael Wensing, Johannes Ullrich\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/04-17-02-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>Research into efficient internal combustion (IC) engines need to continue as the majority of vehicles will still be powered by IC or hybrid powertrains in the foreseeable future. Recently, lean-burn gasoline compression ignition (GCI) with high-pressure direct injection has been receiving considerable attention among the research community due to its ability to improve thermal efficiency and reduce emissions. To maximize GCI benefits in engine efficiency and emissions tradeoff, co-optimization of the combustion system and fuel formation is required. Thus, it is essential to study the spray characteristics of different fuels under engine-like operating conditions. In this work, high-pressure spray characteristics are experimentally studied for three blends of gasoline, namely, Naphtha, E30, and research octane number (RON) 98. A single-hole custom-built injector was used to inject fuel into a constant volume chamber with injection pressure varying from 40 MPa to 100 MPa. The chamber pressure was varied from 4 MPa to 7 MPa. The spray parameters measured were liquid and vapor penetration, liquid and vapor spray plume angle, and spray and flame luminosity area for reacting and non-reacting sprays. The measurement techniques used were shadowgraphy, Schlieren method, and flame luminosity area measurement. Liquid penetration followed the fuel density pattern and was shortest for Naphtha, followed by RON 98 and E30. The increase in injection pressure did not significantly affect liquid penetration, but improved atomization as well as reduced soot intensity. In addition, vapor penetration was increased on account of higher injection velocity and vaporized mass. The higher chamber pressure drastically reduced liquid and vapor penetration on account of increased drag. Compared to non-reacting sprays, vapor penetration and spray plume angle for reacting sprays deviated according to the fuel type. Ignition of the fuel increased vapor penetration and spray plume angle due to the expansion of hot gases. Naphtha ignited the earliest on account of its low RON and high volatility. It had the highest deviation from the corresponding non-reacting case for vapor penetration. RON 98 fuel only showed a slight increase in vapor plume angle indicating the start of reaction, whereas E30 did not show any deviation.</div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/04-17-02-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/04-17-02-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对高效内燃机(IC)发动机的研究需要继续,因为在可预见的未来,大多数车辆仍将由IC或混合动力系统提供动力。近年来,采用高压直喷的稀燃汽油压缩点火技术(GCI)因其能够提高热效率和降低排放而受到了研究界的广泛关注。为了最大限度地提高发动机效率和排放平衡的GCI效益,需要对燃烧系统和燃料形成进行共同优化。因此,研究不同燃料在类似发动机工况下的喷雾特性是十分必要的。本文对石脑油、E30和研究辛烷值(RON) 98三种汽油的高压喷雾特性进行了实验研究。采用定制的单孔喷油器将燃油喷射到定容室中,喷射压力在40 ~ 100 MPa之间。箱体压力在4 ~ 7 MPa之间变化。测量的喷雾参数为反应和非反应喷雾的液体和蒸汽穿透度、液体和蒸汽喷雾羽角、喷雾和火焰亮度面积。测量技术主要有影影法、纹影法和火焰光度面积法。液体渗透符合燃料密度规律,石脑油最短,其次是RON 98和E30。喷射压力的增加对液体渗透没有显著影响,但提高了雾化效果,降低了烟尘强度。此外,由于喷射速度和汽化质量的增加,蒸汽渗透也增加了。由于阻力增加,较高的腔室压力大大减少了液体和蒸汽的渗透。与非反应喷雾剂相比,反应喷雾剂的蒸气穿透度和喷流角随燃料类型的不同而发生偏差。由于热气体的膨胀,燃料的点火增加了蒸汽渗透和喷雾羽角。石脑油因其挥发性高、挥发率低而最早引燃。对于蒸汽渗透,它与相应的非反应情况的偏差最大。RON 98燃料仅显示蒸汽羽流角略有增加,表明反应开始,而E30没有显示任何偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Study of High-Pressure Reacting and Non-reacting Sprays for Various Gasoline Blends
Research into efficient internal combustion (IC) engines need to continue as the majority of vehicles will still be powered by IC or hybrid powertrains in the foreseeable future. Recently, lean-burn gasoline compression ignition (GCI) with high-pressure direct injection has been receiving considerable attention among the research community due to its ability to improve thermal efficiency and reduce emissions. To maximize GCI benefits in engine efficiency and emissions tradeoff, co-optimization of the combustion system and fuel formation is required. Thus, it is essential to study the spray characteristics of different fuels under engine-like operating conditions. In this work, high-pressure spray characteristics are experimentally studied for three blends of gasoline, namely, Naphtha, E30, and research octane number (RON) 98. A single-hole custom-built injector was used to inject fuel into a constant volume chamber with injection pressure varying from 40 MPa to 100 MPa. The chamber pressure was varied from 4 MPa to 7 MPa. The spray parameters measured were liquid and vapor penetration, liquid and vapor spray plume angle, and spray and flame luminosity area for reacting and non-reacting sprays. The measurement techniques used were shadowgraphy, Schlieren method, and flame luminosity area measurement. Liquid penetration followed the fuel density pattern and was shortest for Naphtha, followed by RON 98 and E30. The increase in injection pressure did not significantly affect liquid penetration, but improved atomization as well as reduced soot intensity. In addition, vapor penetration was increased on account of higher injection velocity and vaporized mass. The higher chamber pressure drastically reduced liquid and vapor penetration on account of increased drag. Compared to non-reacting sprays, vapor penetration and spray plume angle for reacting sprays deviated according to the fuel type. Ignition of the fuel increased vapor penetration and spray plume angle due to the expansion of hot gases. Naphtha ignited the earliest on account of its low RON and high volatility. It had the highest deviation from the corresponding non-reacting case for vapor penetration. RON 98 fuel only showed a slight increase in vapor plume angle indicating the start of reaction, whereas E30 did not show any deviation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信