基于电子健康记录的社区获得性肺炎住院患者抗生素治疗识别

David Yang, Leigh Cressman, Keith Hamilton, Lauren Dutcher
{"title":"基于电子健康记录的社区获得性肺炎住院患者抗生素治疗识别","authors":"David Yang, Leigh Cressman, Keith Hamilton, Lauren Dutcher","doi":"10.1017/ash.2023.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common. Although antibiotic stewardship activities require real-time, accurate identification of patients being treated for CAP, there are few reliable methods to identify such patients using the electronic health record (EHR). We conducted a retrospective study to assess the performance of provider-selected antibiotic indication in identifying patients being treated for CAP among a cohort of hospitalized adults. Methods: We randomly selected 440 patients from a cohort of patients who received at least 1 systemic antibiotic within 48 hours of admission between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, at 3 acute-care hospitals. The reference standard for treatment of CAP was defined as intention to treat for pneumonia by inpatient provider(s) within 48 hours of admission, as assessed by chart review of provider notes. Treatment for pneumonia using any terminology except with “hospital-acquired pneumonia” (HAP) or “ventilator-associated pneumonia” (VAP) were counted. Provider-selected indication of CAP (in an antibiotic order) was compared against this reference standard; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Performance characteristics of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for pneumonia in identifying CAP patients were assessed against the same reference standard. A secondary analysis including terms HAP and VAP in the reference standard was performed. Results: Provider-selected antibiotic indication for CAP had a sensitivity of 64.4%, specificity of 96.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1%, giving comparable performance to ICD-10 codes (Table 1). Of those with 21 false-negative results, 13 (61.9%) had a healthcare-associated lower respiratory tract infection and 14 (66.7%) had sepsis indicated in at least 1 antibiotic order. Conclusions: Provider-selected antibiotic indication showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity for identifying CAP-treated cases. Importantly, use of this method can be deployed for real-time antibiotic stewardship interventions for CAP. Disclosures: None","PeriodicalId":7953,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic health record–based identification of inpatients receiving antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia\",\"authors\":\"David Yang, Leigh Cressman, Keith Hamilton, Lauren Dutcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2023.253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common. Although antibiotic stewardship activities require real-time, accurate identification of patients being treated for CAP, there are few reliable methods to identify such patients using the electronic health record (EHR). We conducted a retrospective study to assess the performance of provider-selected antibiotic indication in identifying patients being treated for CAP among a cohort of hospitalized adults. Methods: We randomly selected 440 patients from a cohort of patients who received at least 1 systemic antibiotic within 48 hours of admission between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, at 3 acute-care hospitals. The reference standard for treatment of CAP was defined as intention to treat for pneumonia by inpatient provider(s) within 48 hours of admission, as assessed by chart review of provider notes. Treatment for pneumonia using any terminology except with “hospital-acquired pneumonia” (HAP) or “ventilator-associated pneumonia” (VAP) were counted. Provider-selected indication of CAP (in an antibiotic order) was compared against this reference standard; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Performance characteristics of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for pneumonia in identifying CAP patients were assessed against the same reference standard. A secondary analysis including terms HAP and VAP in the reference standard was performed. Results: Provider-selected antibiotic indication for CAP had a sensitivity of 64.4%, specificity of 96.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1%, giving comparable performance to ICD-10 codes (Table 1). Of those with 21 false-negative results, 13 (61.9%) had a healthcare-associated lower respiratory tract infection and 14 (66.7%) had sepsis indicated in at least 1 antibiotic order. Conclusions: Provider-selected antibiotic indication showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity for identifying CAP-treated cases. Importantly, use of this method can be deployed for real-time antibiotic stewardship interventions for CAP. Disclosures: None\",\"PeriodicalId\":7953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的不适当抗生素使用是常见的。尽管抗生素管理活动需要实时、准确地识别正在接受CAP治疗的患者,但使用电子健康记录(EHR)识别此类患者的可靠方法很少。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估在一组住院成人中,提供者选择的抗生素指征在确定接受CAP治疗的患者中的表现。方法:我们从2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间入院48小时内至少接受过1种全身性抗生素治疗的患者队列中随机选择440例患者,这些患者来自3家急症医院。CAP治疗的参考标准被定义为住院医生在入院48小时内治疗肺炎的意向,通过对医生说明的图表审查进行评估。除“医院获得性肺炎”(HAP)或“呼吸机相关性肺炎”(VAP)外的任何术语的肺炎治疗均被计算在内。将供应商选择的CAP指征(在抗生素订单中)与本参考标准进行比较;计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。根据相同的参考标准评估国际疾病分类第十版(ICD-10)肺炎代码在识别CAP患者中的表现特征。进行二次分析,包括参考标准中的HAP和VAP。结果:CAP的提供者选择的抗生素指征的敏感性为64.4%,特异性为96.3%,阳性预测值(PPV)为73.1%,阴性预测值(NPV)为96.1%,与ICD-10代码具有相当的性能(表1)。在21个假阴性结果中,13个(61.9%)有医疗保健相关的下呼吸道感染,14个(66.7%)有败血症至少有一个抗生素指示。结论:提供者选择的抗生素指征对cap治疗的病例具有中等敏感性和高特异性。重要的是,使用这种方法可以用于CAP的实时抗生素管理干预。披露:无
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electronic health record–based identification of inpatients receiving antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia
Background: Inappropriate antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is common. Although antibiotic stewardship activities require real-time, accurate identification of patients being treated for CAP, there are few reliable methods to identify such patients using the electronic health record (EHR). We conducted a retrospective study to assess the performance of provider-selected antibiotic indication in identifying patients being treated for CAP among a cohort of hospitalized adults. Methods: We randomly selected 440 patients from a cohort of patients who received at least 1 systemic antibiotic within 48 hours of admission between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, at 3 acute-care hospitals. The reference standard for treatment of CAP was defined as intention to treat for pneumonia by inpatient provider(s) within 48 hours of admission, as assessed by chart review of provider notes. Treatment for pneumonia using any terminology except with “hospital-acquired pneumonia” (HAP) or “ventilator-associated pneumonia” (VAP) were counted. Provider-selected indication of CAP (in an antibiotic order) was compared against this reference standard; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Performance characteristics of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for pneumonia in identifying CAP patients were assessed against the same reference standard. A secondary analysis including terms HAP and VAP in the reference standard was performed. Results: Provider-selected antibiotic indication for CAP had a sensitivity of 64.4%, specificity of 96.3%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.1%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.1%, giving comparable performance to ICD-10 codes (Table 1). Of those with 21 false-negative results, 13 (61.9%) had a healthcare-associated lower respiratory tract infection and 14 (66.7%) had sepsis indicated in at least 1 antibiotic order. Conclusions: Provider-selected antibiotic indication showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity for identifying CAP-treated cases. Importantly, use of this method can be deployed for real-time antibiotic stewardship interventions for CAP. Disclosures: None
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信