《中心不能坚持:国会议员威廉·h·英格利希和他的战前政治时代》艾略特·希梅尔著(书评)

{"title":"《中心不能坚持:国会议员威廉·h·英格利希和他的战前政治时代》艾略特·希梅尔著(书评)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/imh.2023.a899503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: The Center Could Not Hold: Congressman William H. English and His Antebellum Political Times by Elliott Schimmel A. James Fuller The Center Could Not Hold: Congressman William H. English and His Antebellum Political Times By Elliott Schimmel (Ocala, Fl.: Atlantic Publishing, 2020. Pp. 562. Illustrations, appendix, works cited, index. Paperbound, $29.95.) In one sense, Elliott Schimmel has done a great service with this book. We need a biography of William H. English, four-term congressman and the Democratic Party's vice-presidential candidate in 1880. Not only was English a rising political star in the 1850s, he was also a prominent banker and real estate developer in Indianapolis. His real estate projects helped build the city, a fact marked today by English Avenue, which still bears his name. Meanwhile, from its opening on the downtown Circle in 1880 until its closing in 1948, his English's Hotel and Opera House served as a center of the city's social and cultural life. In providing us with a deeply researched political biography, Schimmel has helped fill the need for a study of English. In another sense, this book is a disappointment. Schimmel rightly argues that English tried to lead the country to a compromise over the extension of slavery into Kansas, the issue that brought on the Civil War. Even the title points to placing the subject in the context of his political times. But the book ultimately fails to give us what we need from a study of William H. English. The author clearly states that this is a study of one half of one man's life, focused on his political career. However, the argument that English was a moderate Democrat who failed in his effort to bring about a compromise ultimately falls short of the mark, as does the book's limited scope. Born in Scott County, Indiana, William English attended Hanover College but left the school to start a law practice. A lifelong Jacksonian Democrat, he was elected to the state legislature in 1851 and in the following year to Congress, where he served four terms. His [End Page 193] time there was dominated by the issue of slavery, as the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 opened the door to the expansion of slavery by overturning the Missouri Compromise. English voted for the measure and then helped vote down the admission of Kansas as a slave state under the Lecompton Constitution. He subsequently introduced the English Bill, a compromise that would allow Kansas to be admitted as a slave state if its voters approved the act, which substantially curtailed the amount of federal land gifted to the new state. Kansas voters rejected the measure and Kansas did not become a slave state. English did not seek reelection in 1860 and became a \"War Democrat\" who supported the Union effort during the Rebellion. Although he thereafter remained focused mostly on his business interests, he was the Democratic nominee for vice president in 1880, running unsuccessfully with Winfield Scott Hancock. Schimmel covers all this in great detail, perhaps too much detail. Still, the volume fails to show us fully the man in his times, and it is insufficiently conversant with the wide literature on the period. Many footnotes reference important titles but other works are missing, and the text lacks sufficient context to explain persuasively how and why English failed. The author offers strong coverage of English and his politics; he explains the issues of slavery's expansion and English's personal racism. But the need for more context is perhaps best seen in the slim final chapter. English's later career—the rest of his interesting life—needs more attention. Seeing more of English would better explain him and also allow us to see more of Indiana, more of the Midwest, and more of that time in U.S. history. [End Page 194] A. James Fuller University of Indianapolis Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University","PeriodicalId":81518,"journal":{"name":"Indiana magazine of history","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Center Could Not Hold: Congressman William H. English and His Antebellum Political Times by Elliott Schimmel (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/imh.2023.a899503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: The Center Could Not Hold: Congressman William H. English and His Antebellum Political Times by Elliott Schimmel A. James Fuller The Center Could Not Hold: Congressman William H. English and His Antebellum Political Times By Elliott Schimmel (Ocala, Fl.: Atlantic Publishing, 2020. Pp. 562. Illustrations, appendix, works cited, index. Paperbound, $29.95.) In one sense, Elliott Schimmel has done a great service with this book. We need a biography of William H. English, four-term congressman and the Democratic Party's vice-presidential candidate in 1880. Not only was English a rising political star in the 1850s, he was also a prominent banker and real estate developer in Indianapolis. His real estate projects helped build the city, a fact marked today by English Avenue, which still bears his name. Meanwhile, from its opening on the downtown Circle in 1880 until its closing in 1948, his English's Hotel and Opera House served as a center of the city's social and cultural life. In providing us with a deeply researched political biography, Schimmel has helped fill the need for a study of English. In another sense, this book is a disappointment. Schimmel rightly argues that English tried to lead the country to a compromise over the extension of slavery into Kansas, the issue that brought on the Civil War. Even the title points to placing the subject in the context of his political times. But the book ultimately fails to give us what we need from a study of William H. English. The author clearly states that this is a study of one half of one man's life, focused on his political career. However, the argument that English was a moderate Democrat who failed in his effort to bring about a compromise ultimately falls short of the mark, as does the book's limited scope. Born in Scott County, Indiana, William English attended Hanover College but left the school to start a law practice. A lifelong Jacksonian Democrat, he was elected to the state legislature in 1851 and in the following year to Congress, where he served four terms. His [End Page 193] time there was dominated by the issue of slavery, as the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 opened the door to the expansion of slavery by overturning the Missouri Compromise. English voted for the measure and then helped vote down the admission of Kansas as a slave state under the Lecompton Constitution. He subsequently introduced the English Bill, a compromise that would allow Kansas to be admitted as a slave state if its voters approved the act, which substantially curtailed the amount of federal land gifted to the new state. Kansas voters rejected the measure and Kansas did not become a slave state. English did not seek reelection in 1860 and became a \\\"War Democrat\\\" who supported the Union effort during the Rebellion. Although he thereafter remained focused mostly on his business interests, he was the Democratic nominee for vice president in 1880, running unsuccessfully with Winfield Scott Hancock. Schimmel covers all this in great detail, perhaps too much detail. Still, the volume fails to show us fully the man in his times, and it is insufficiently conversant with the wide literature on the period. Many footnotes reference important titles but other works are missing, and the text lacks sufficient context to explain persuasively how and why English failed. The author offers strong coverage of English and his politics; he explains the issues of slavery's expansion and English's personal racism. But the need for more context is perhaps best seen in the slim final chapter. English's later career—the rest of his interesting life—needs more attention. Seeing more of English would better explain him and also allow us to see more of Indiana, more of the Midwest, and more of that time in U.S. history. [End Page 194] A. James Fuller University of Indianapolis Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University\",\"PeriodicalId\":81518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana magazine of history\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana magazine of history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/imh.2023.a899503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana magazine of history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/imh.2023.a899503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《中心不能坚持:国会议员威廉·h·英格利希和他的战前政治时代》作者:埃利奥特·希梅尔A.詹姆斯·富勒《中心不能坚持:国会议员威廉·h·英格利希和他的战前政治时代》作者:埃利奥特·希梅尔(奥卡拉,佛罗里达州:大西洋出版社,2020年)。562页。插图,附录,引用的作品,索引。平装书,29.95美元)。从某种意义上说,艾略特·希梅尔在这本书中做出了巨大贡献。我们需要一本威廉·h·英格利希的传记,他曾连任四届国会议员,也是1880年民主党副总统候选人。英格利斯在19世纪50年代不仅是一颗冉冉升起的政治明星,他还是印第安纳波利斯著名的银行家和房地产开发商。他的房地产项目帮助建立了这座城市,这一事实今天以英国大道(English Avenue)为标志,这条大道仍以他的名字命名。与此同时,从1880年开业到1948年关闭,他的英国酒店和歌剧院一直是城市社会和文化生活的中心。施梅尔为我们提供了一本经过深入研究的政治传记,帮助我们填补了学习英语的需要。从另一个意义上说,这本书令人失望。希梅尔正确地指出,英格利希试图领导国家在奴隶制扩展到堪萨斯的问题上达成妥协,这一问题引发了内战。就连标题都指向将主题置于他的政治时代背景中。但是这本书最终没有给我们提供我们需要从威廉·h·英格利希的研究中得到的东西。作者明确指出,这是对一个人的一半人生的研究,重点是他的政治生涯。然而,认为英格利希是一位温和的民主党人,未能促成妥协的说法最终是站不住脚的,就像这本书有限的范围一样。威廉·英格利希出生在印第安纳州的斯科特县,曾就读汉诺威学院,但后来离开了学校,开始从事法律业务。作为一名终身信奉杰克逊主义的民主党人,他于1851年当选为州议会议员,并于次年进入国会,在那里他连任了四届。1854年的《堪萨斯-内布拉斯加法案》推翻了《密苏里妥协案》,为奴隶制的扩张打开了大门。英格利希投票赞成这项措施,然后又投票反对根据《莱康普顿宪法》承认堪萨斯为蓄奴州。随后,他提出了《英国法案》(English Bill),这是一个妥协方案,如果堪萨斯的选民批准该法案,它将允许堪萨斯成为一个奴隶制州,这大大减少了联邦政府赠予这个新州的土地数量。堪萨斯选民拒绝了这项措施,堪萨斯没有成为一个奴隶州。1860年,英格利希没有寻求连任,他成为了一名“战时民主党人”,在叛乱期间支持联邦的努力。尽管此后他主要专注于自己的商业利益,但他还是在1880年被民主党提名为副总统候选人,与温菲尔德·斯科特·汉考克(Winfield Scott Hancock)竞选失败。Schimmel非常详细地描述了这一切,也许是过于详细了。然而,这本书并没有向我们充分展示他那个时代的人物,也没有充分了解那个时期的广泛文献。许多脚注引用了重要的标题,但缺少其他作品,并且文本缺乏足够的上下文来令人信服地解释英语如何以及为什么失败。作者对英语和他的政治有很强的报道;他解释了奴隶制扩张和英国个人种族主义的问题。不过,在篇幅较短的最后一章中,我们或许可以最好地看到对更多背景的需要。英格利希后来的事业——他有趣的余生——需要更多的关注。多学习英语可以更好地解释他,也可以让我们更多地了解印第安纳州、中西部地区,以及美国历史上的那段时间。[End Page 194] A. James Fuller University of Indianapolis版权所有©2023印第安纳大学董事会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Center Could Not Hold: Congressman William H. English and His Antebellum Political Times by Elliott Schimmel (review)
Reviewed by: The Center Could Not Hold: Congressman William H. English and His Antebellum Political Times by Elliott Schimmel A. James Fuller The Center Could Not Hold: Congressman William H. English and His Antebellum Political Times By Elliott Schimmel (Ocala, Fl.: Atlantic Publishing, 2020. Pp. 562. Illustrations, appendix, works cited, index. Paperbound, $29.95.) In one sense, Elliott Schimmel has done a great service with this book. We need a biography of William H. English, four-term congressman and the Democratic Party's vice-presidential candidate in 1880. Not only was English a rising political star in the 1850s, he was also a prominent banker and real estate developer in Indianapolis. His real estate projects helped build the city, a fact marked today by English Avenue, which still bears his name. Meanwhile, from its opening on the downtown Circle in 1880 until its closing in 1948, his English's Hotel and Opera House served as a center of the city's social and cultural life. In providing us with a deeply researched political biography, Schimmel has helped fill the need for a study of English. In another sense, this book is a disappointment. Schimmel rightly argues that English tried to lead the country to a compromise over the extension of slavery into Kansas, the issue that brought on the Civil War. Even the title points to placing the subject in the context of his political times. But the book ultimately fails to give us what we need from a study of William H. English. The author clearly states that this is a study of one half of one man's life, focused on his political career. However, the argument that English was a moderate Democrat who failed in his effort to bring about a compromise ultimately falls short of the mark, as does the book's limited scope. Born in Scott County, Indiana, William English attended Hanover College but left the school to start a law practice. A lifelong Jacksonian Democrat, he was elected to the state legislature in 1851 and in the following year to Congress, where he served four terms. His [End Page 193] time there was dominated by the issue of slavery, as the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 opened the door to the expansion of slavery by overturning the Missouri Compromise. English voted for the measure and then helped vote down the admission of Kansas as a slave state under the Lecompton Constitution. He subsequently introduced the English Bill, a compromise that would allow Kansas to be admitted as a slave state if its voters approved the act, which substantially curtailed the amount of federal land gifted to the new state. Kansas voters rejected the measure and Kansas did not become a slave state. English did not seek reelection in 1860 and became a "War Democrat" who supported the Union effort during the Rebellion. Although he thereafter remained focused mostly on his business interests, he was the Democratic nominee for vice president in 1880, running unsuccessfully with Winfield Scott Hancock. Schimmel covers all this in great detail, perhaps too much detail. Still, the volume fails to show us fully the man in his times, and it is insufficiently conversant with the wide literature on the period. Many footnotes reference important titles but other works are missing, and the text lacks sufficient context to explain persuasively how and why English failed. The author offers strong coverage of English and his politics; he explains the issues of slavery's expansion and English's personal racism. But the need for more context is perhaps best seen in the slim final chapter. English's later career—the rest of his interesting life—needs more attention. Seeing more of English would better explain him and also allow us to see more of Indiana, more of the Midwest, and more of that time in U.S. history. [End Page 194] A. James Fuller University of Indianapolis Copyright © 2023 Trustees of Indiana University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信