《反对林肯:克莱门特·l·瓦兰狄甘、总统权力和战时异议的法律斗争》作者:托马斯·c·麦基(书评)

{"title":"《反对林肯:克莱门特·l·瓦兰狄甘、总统权力和战时异议的法律斗争》作者:托马斯·c·麦基(书评)","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/imh.2023.a899504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime by Thomas C. Mackey Joshua A. Lynn Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime By Thomas C. Mackey (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2020. Pp. ix, 188. Bibliographical essay, index. Clothbound, $55.00; paperbound, $24.95.) Recent scholarship has blurred the sharp distinctions that Americans have traditionally relied on to make sense of their civil war. The differences between North and South, home front and battlefield, and combatant and non-combatant have become muddied. Studies of women's and enslaved Americans' wartime roles, along with the recognition of the war as a humanitarian and environmental crisis, have recast the conflict as an all-encompassing experience shaping daily life far beyond the battlefield. Diverse Americans unexpectedly found themselves combatants, and diverse locales became sites of conflict. Legal and constitutional history has reinforced these insights, as wartime legal developments underscored how the statuses of enslaved and free, combatant and non-combatant, and Unionist and traitor oscillated with the tides of war. Thomas C. Mackey's Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime adds to this discussion by situating legal history amid the Civil War's shifting landscape. Mackey recounts the legal saga of Ohio politician Clement L. Vallandigham. In 1863, the United States military arrested Vallandigham for a speech criticizing the war effort. After Vallandigham's conviction by a military commission, Abraham Lincoln banished the rabble-rouser to the Confederacy. His ordeal raised questions about the suspension of habeas corpus and whether military commissions could try civilians in wartime. Mackey explains how Vallandigham, a midwestern Copperhead Democrat, became an outspoken opponent of the Lincoln administration. From the war's beginning, Lincoln worried about potentially treasonous citizens like Vallandigham. Mackey relates important developments prior to Vallandigham's arrest, such as Lincoln's 1861 suspension of habeas corpus, as the president wrestled with how to use his war powers to tamp down disloyalty and dissent. Mackey finds coherence in Lincoln's policies, especially through analyzing his \"Corning letter\" and \"Birchard letter,\" texts in which the president defended his actions after Vallandigham's arrest. Given genuine fears over disloyal citizens on the home front, Lincoln articulated a policy that protected the Union while also showing restraint. Mackey applauds Lincoln for operating within [End Page 195] the Constitution and the democratic political order. Lincoln did not crush dissent or stymie his political opposition. The Democratic Party itself was not curtailed, but Vallandigham, as an extreme Copperhead Democrat, did find himself arrested, hauled before a military commission, denied a writ of habeas corpus, and, somewhat whimsically, banished. His prosecution, Mackey suggests, even benefited Democrats by removing a figure whose extremism impugned the party's Unionism. Mackey's work dovetails with a growing scholarship that investigates the war's ambiguities, especially regarding loyalty and disloyalty, by focusing on a geographical region that was ambiguous itself: the Midwest. This was a region where North and South intermingled. The Midwest included slaveholding states that remained in the Union alongside free states, such as Indiana and Ohio, that housed significant pro-Southern populations. As such, the Midwest was particularly volatile during wartime and is an ideal place to explore how the distinctions between combatants and non-combatants and loyal and disloyal citizens were never clear cut. Legal and military authorities struggled to impose order amid fluid conditions along the North-South border, a region beset by irregular warfare and unstable loyalties. Vallandigham's political identity as an antebellum Jacksonian Democrat, which made him wary of federal power and committed to white supremacy, fused with the political culture of the lower North to produce one of the most virulent domestic critics of the Lincoln administration. Midwestern Copperhead Democrats, Mackey concludes, posed an \"internal security threat\" (p. 46). Mackey's account reminds us that the Civil War was also waged in midwestern states like Indiana, even if they were spared large-scale conflict between regular armies. By placing legal history in its wartime context and within a midwestern setting, Mackey delivers a spirited defense of Lincoln's war powers and...","PeriodicalId":81518,"journal":{"name":"Indiana magazine of history","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime by Thomas C. Mackey (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/imh.2023.a899504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime by Thomas C. Mackey Joshua A. Lynn Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime By Thomas C. Mackey (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2020. Pp. ix, 188. Bibliographical essay, index. Clothbound, $55.00; paperbound, $24.95.) Recent scholarship has blurred the sharp distinctions that Americans have traditionally relied on to make sense of their civil war. The differences between North and South, home front and battlefield, and combatant and non-combatant have become muddied. Studies of women's and enslaved Americans' wartime roles, along with the recognition of the war as a humanitarian and environmental crisis, have recast the conflict as an all-encompassing experience shaping daily life far beyond the battlefield. Diverse Americans unexpectedly found themselves combatants, and diverse locales became sites of conflict. Legal and constitutional history has reinforced these insights, as wartime legal developments underscored how the statuses of enslaved and free, combatant and non-combatant, and Unionist and traitor oscillated with the tides of war. Thomas C. Mackey's Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime adds to this discussion by situating legal history amid the Civil War's shifting landscape. Mackey recounts the legal saga of Ohio politician Clement L. Vallandigham. In 1863, the United States military arrested Vallandigham for a speech criticizing the war effort. After Vallandigham's conviction by a military commission, Abraham Lincoln banished the rabble-rouser to the Confederacy. His ordeal raised questions about the suspension of habeas corpus and whether military commissions could try civilians in wartime. Mackey explains how Vallandigham, a midwestern Copperhead Democrat, became an outspoken opponent of the Lincoln administration. From the war's beginning, Lincoln worried about potentially treasonous citizens like Vallandigham. Mackey relates important developments prior to Vallandigham's arrest, such as Lincoln's 1861 suspension of habeas corpus, as the president wrestled with how to use his war powers to tamp down disloyalty and dissent. Mackey finds coherence in Lincoln's policies, especially through analyzing his \\\"Corning letter\\\" and \\\"Birchard letter,\\\" texts in which the president defended his actions after Vallandigham's arrest. Given genuine fears over disloyal citizens on the home front, Lincoln articulated a policy that protected the Union while also showing restraint. Mackey applauds Lincoln for operating within [End Page 195] the Constitution and the democratic political order. Lincoln did not crush dissent or stymie his political opposition. The Democratic Party itself was not curtailed, but Vallandigham, as an extreme Copperhead Democrat, did find himself arrested, hauled before a military commission, denied a writ of habeas corpus, and, somewhat whimsically, banished. His prosecution, Mackey suggests, even benefited Democrats by removing a figure whose extremism impugned the party's Unionism. Mackey's work dovetails with a growing scholarship that investigates the war's ambiguities, especially regarding loyalty and disloyalty, by focusing on a geographical region that was ambiguous itself: the Midwest. This was a region where North and South intermingled. The Midwest included slaveholding states that remained in the Union alongside free states, such as Indiana and Ohio, that housed significant pro-Southern populations. As such, the Midwest was particularly volatile during wartime and is an ideal place to explore how the distinctions between combatants and non-combatants and loyal and disloyal citizens were never clear cut. Legal and military authorities struggled to impose order amid fluid conditions along the North-South border, a region beset by irregular warfare and unstable loyalties. Vallandigham's political identity as an antebellum Jacksonian Democrat, which made him wary of federal power and committed to white supremacy, fused with the political culture of the lower North to produce one of the most virulent domestic critics of the Lincoln administration. Midwestern Copperhead Democrats, Mackey concludes, posed an \\\"internal security threat\\\" (p. 46). Mackey's account reminds us that the Civil War was also waged in midwestern states like Indiana, even if they were spared large-scale conflict between regular armies. By placing legal history in its wartime context and within a midwestern setting, Mackey delivers a spirited defense of Lincoln's war powers and...\",\"PeriodicalId\":81518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana magazine of history\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana magazine of history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/imh.2023.a899504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana magazine of history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/imh.2023.a899504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

书评:《反对林肯:克莱门特·l·瓦兰狄甘,总统权力和战时异议的法律斗争》,作者:托马斯·c·麦基(劳伦斯:堪萨斯大学出版社,2020年)。第9页,188页。参考文献论文,索引。精装的,55.00美元;平装书,24.95美元)。最近的学术研究模糊了美国人传统上用来解释内战的尖锐区别。南北、后方和战场、战斗人员和非战斗人员的区别变得模糊不清。对妇女和被奴役的美国人在战争中的角色的研究,以及对这场战争是一场人道主义和环境危机的认识,已经将这场冲突重塑为一场全面的经历,影响着远远超出战场的日常生活。不同的美国人意外地发现自己是战斗人员,不同的地区成为冲突的场所。法律和宪法的历史强化了这些见解,因为战时法律的发展强调了奴隶和自由人、战斗人员和非战斗人员、联合主义者和叛徒的地位如何随着战争的浪潮而波动。托马斯·c·麦基的《反对林肯:克莱门特·l·瓦兰狄甘、总统权力和战时异议的法律斗争》通过将法律史置于内战不断变化的环境中,为这一讨论增添了内容。麦基讲述了俄亥俄州政治家克莱门特·l·瓦兰狄甘的法律传奇。1863年,美国军方逮捕了瓦兰狄甘,因为他发表了批评战争努力的演讲。在巴兰狄甘被军事委员会定罪后,亚伯拉罕·林肯将这个煽动群众的人驱逐到南部联盟。他的遭遇引发了人们对人身保护令中止的质疑,以及军事委员会是否可以在战时审判平民。麦基解释了瓦兰狄甘这个来自中西部的民主党人是如何成为林肯政府直言不讳的反对者的。从战争一开始,林肯就担心像瓦兰狄甘这样的潜在叛国者。麦基讲述了在瓦兰狄甘被捕之前的一些重要事件,比如林肯在1861年暂停人身保护令,当时总统正在努力解决如何使用他的战争权力来镇压不忠和异见。麦基在林肯的政策中找到了连贯性,特别是通过分析他的“康宁信”和“伯查德信”,总统在这些文本中为他在瓦兰狄甘被捕后的行为辩护。考虑到对国内不忠公民的真正担忧,林肯阐述了一项保护联邦同时也表现出克制的政策。麦基赞扬林肯在宪法和民主政治秩序的范围内行事。林肯没有镇压异议或阻碍他的政治反对派。民主党本身并没有受到限制,但作为一个极端的铜头党民主党人,瓦兰狄甘却被逮捕了,被拖到军事委员会面前,他的人身保护令被驳回,而且有点异想天开地被驱逐了。麦基认为,对他的起诉甚至使民主党受益,因为他除掉了一个极端主义抨击该党统一制的人物。麦基的工作与越来越多的学术研究相吻合,这些学术研究通过关注一个本身就模棱两可的地理区域:中西部,来调查这场战争的模糊性,特别是关于忠诚和不忠诚的问题。这是一个南北混居的地区。中西部地区包括保留奴隶制的州和自由州,如印第安纳州和俄亥俄州,这些州居住着大量的亲南方人口。因此,中西部地区在战争期间特别不稳定,是一个理想的地方,可以探索战斗人员和非战斗人员以及忠诚和不忠诚的公民之间的区别是如何从来没有明确过的。法律和军事当局努力在南北边境的动荡局势中维持秩序,该地区受到非正规战争和不稳定忠诚的困扰。瓦兰狄甘在内战前的政治身份是杰克逊派民主党人,这使他对联邦权力保持警惕,并致力于白人至上主义,他与北方下游的政治文化融合在一起,成为林肯政府在国内最激烈的批评者之一。麦基总结说,中西部的铜头党民主党人构成了“内部安全威胁”(第46页)。麦基的叙述提醒我们,内战也发生在印第安纳州等中西部各州,尽管这些州没有发生正规军之间的大规模冲突。麦基将法律历史置于战争时期的背景和中西部的背景下,为林肯的战争权力和……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime by Thomas C. Mackey (review)
Reviewed by: Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime by Thomas C. Mackey Joshua A. Lynn Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime By Thomas C. Mackey (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2020. Pp. ix, 188. Bibliographical essay, index. Clothbound, $55.00; paperbound, $24.95.) Recent scholarship has blurred the sharp distinctions that Americans have traditionally relied on to make sense of their civil war. The differences between North and South, home front and battlefield, and combatant and non-combatant have become muddied. Studies of women's and enslaved Americans' wartime roles, along with the recognition of the war as a humanitarian and environmental crisis, have recast the conflict as an all-encompassing experience shaping daily life far beyond the battlefield. Diverse Americans unexpectedly found themselves combatants, and diverse locales became sites of conflict. Legal and constitutional history has reinforced these insights, as wartime legal developments underscored how the statuses of enslaved and free, combatant and non-combatant, and Unionist and traitor oscillated with the tides of war. Thomas C. Mackey's Opposing Lincoln: Clement L. Vallandigham, Presidential Power, and the Legal Battle over Dissent in Wartime adds to this discussion by situating legal history amid the Civil War's shifting landscape. Mackey recounts the legal saga of Ohio politician Clement L. Vallandigham. In 1863, the United States military arrested Vallandigham for a speech criticizing the war effort. After Vallandigham's conviction by a military commission, Abraham Lincoln banished the rabble-rouser to the Confederacy. His ordeal raised questions about the suspension of habeas corpus and whether military commissions could try civilians in wartime. Mackey explains how Vallandigham, a midwestern Copperhead Democrat, became an outspoken opponent of the Lincoln administration. From the war's beginning, Lincoln worried about potentially treasonous citizens like Vallandigham. Mackey relates important developments prior to Vallandigham's arrest, such as Lincoln's 1861 suspension of habeas corpus, as the president wrestled with how to use his war powers to tamp down disloyalty and dissent. Mackey finds coherence in Lincoln's policies, especially through analyzing his "Corning letter" and "Birchard letter," texts in which the president defended his actions after Vallandigham's arrest. Given genuine fears over disloyal citizens on the home front, Lincoln articulated a policy that protected the Union while also showing restraint. Mackey applauds Lincoln for operating within [End Page 195] the Constitution and the democratic political order. Lincoln did not crush dissent or stymie his political opposition. The Democratic Party itself was not curtailed, but Vallandigham, as an extreme Copperhead Democrat, did find himself arrested, hauled before a military commission, denied a writ of habeas corpus, and, somewhat whimsically, banished. His prosecution, Mackey suggests, even benefited Democrats by removing a figure whose extremism impugned the party's Unionism. Mackey's work dovetails with a growing scholarship that investigates the war's ambiguities, especially regarding loyalty and disloyalty, by focusing on a geographical region that was ambiguous itself: the Midwest. This was a region where North and South intermingled. The Midwest included slaveholding states that remained in the Union alongside free states, such as Indiana and Ohio, that housed significant pro-Southern populations. As such, the Midwest was particularly volatile during wartime and is an ideal place to explore how the distinctions between combatants and non-combatants and loyal and disloyal citizens were never clear cut. Legal and military authorities struggled to impose order amid fluid conditions along the North-South border, a region beset by irregular warfare and unstable loyalties. Vallandigham's political identity as an antebellum Jacksonian Democrat, which made him wary of federal power and committed to white supremacy, fused with the political culture of the lower North to produce one of the most virulent domestic critics of the Lincoln administration. Midwestern Copperhead Democrats, Mackey concludes, posed an "internal security threat" (p. 46). Mackey's account reminds us that the Civil War was also waged in midwestern states like Indiana, even if they were spared large-scale conflict between regular armies. By placing legal history in its wartime context and within a midwestern setting, Mackey delivers a spirited defense of Lincoln's war powers and...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信