合作策略阅读在英语语境下的实施:熟练程度与视角

Rozanah Katrina Herda, Teguh Setiawan, Regine Aguilar Principe
{"title":"合作策略阅读在英语语境下的实施:熟练程度与视角","authors":"Rozanah Katrina Herda, Teguh Setiawan, Regine Aguilar Principe","doi":"10.24071/llt.v26i2.6408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The students are mostly unmotivated in the EFL reading classrooms since they have problems reading English texts. They feel stressed as they consider themselves alone, readers who cannot understand the text content well. This mixed-method study aimed to (1) investigate the significant difference between the mean scores of the pretest and the post-test in reading using Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) and (2) describe the students' reflections using CSR in the reading classroom. The data were collected by using a pretest-posttest and students' reflection sheets. The participants were 32 students from a private university in Indonesia. The pretest and post-test results indicated that CSR significantly improved students' reading skills in collaborative classrooms. The written reflections showed students were highly motivated to join collaborative reading, as the strategies were beneficial for improving their vocabulary, reading understanding, and critical thinking. This study greatly influences improving students' reading proficiency and social skills.","PeriodicalId":31957,"journal":{"name":"LLT Journal A Journal on Language and Language Teaching","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INVESTIGATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING (CSR) IN EFL CONTEXT: PROFICIENCY AND PERSPECTIVES\",\"authors\":\"Rozanah Katrina Herda, Teguh Setiawan, Regine Aguilar Principe\",\"doi\":\"10.24071/llt.v26i2.6408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The students are mostly unmotivated in the EFL reading classrooms since they have problems reading English texts. They feel stressed as they consider themselves alone, readers who cannot understand the text content well. This mixed-method study aimed to (1) investigate the significant difference between the mean scores of the pretest and the post-test in reading using Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) and (2) describe the students' reflections using CSR in the reading classroom. The data were collected by using a pretest-posttest and students' reflection sheets. The participants were 32 students from a private university in Indonesia. The pretest and post-test results indicated that CSR significantly improved students' reading skills in collaborative classrooms. The written reflections showed students were highly motivated to join collaborative reading, as the strategies were beneficial for improving their vocabulary, reading understanding, and critical thinking. This study greatly influences improving students' reading proficiency and social skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LLT Journal A Journal on Language and Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LLT Journal A Journal on Language and Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LLT Journal A Journal on Language and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i2.6408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英语阅读课堂上,学生大多缺乏阅读动机,因为他们在阅读英语文本方面存在问题。他们感到压力,因为他们认为自己是一个人,读者不能很好地理解文本内容。本混合方法研究旨在(1)调查使用协同策略阅读(CSR)的阅读前测和后测平均分的显著差异;(2)描述学生在阅读课堂中使用协同策略阅读的反思。数据收集采用前测后测法和学生反思表。参与者是来自印度尼西亚一所私立大学的32名学生。测试前和测试后的结果表明,企业社会责任显著提高了学生在合作课堂上的阅读技能。书面反思表明,学生们参与合作阅读的积极性很高,因为这种策略有利于提高他们的词汇量、阅读理解和批判性思维。本研究对提高学生的阅读能力和社交能力有很大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
INVESTIGATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING (CSR) IN EFL CONTEXT: PROFICIENCY AND PERSPECTIVES
The students are mostly unmotivated in the EFL reading classrooms since they have problems reading English texts. They feel stressed as they consider themselves alone, readers who cannot understand the text content well. This mixed-method study aimed to (1) investigate the significant difference between the mean scores of the pretest and the post-test in reading using Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) and (2) describe the students' reflections using CSR in the reading classroom. The data were collected by using a pretest-posttest and students' reflection sheets. The participants were 32 students from a private university in Indonesia. The pretest and post-test results indicated that CSR significantly improved students' reading skills in collaborative classrooms. The written reflections showed students were highly motivated to join collaborative reading, as the strategies were beneficial for improving their vocabulary, reading understanding, and critical thinking. This study greatly influences improving students' reading proficiency and social skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信