基于IEC 61508标准的天然气设施安全仪表系统评价

Q3 Engineering
Nabil Boudjoghra, Fares Innal
{"title":"基于IEC 61508标准的天然气设施安全仪表系统评价","authors":"Nabil Boudjoghra, Fares Innal","doi":"10.18280/ijsse.130504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work presented was aimed primarily at contributing to the control of risks relating to an industrial installation by means of a safety instrumented system (SIS), through a global approach defined by the IEC 61508 standard which goes from risk analysis to the evaluation of SIS. The IEC 61508 approach consists of industrial risk analysis which is a process used to identify the risks inherent in an industrial system and estimate the levels of these risks using several methods, tools and software. Then, the reduction of risks deemed unacceptable in the risk analysis phase to an acceptable level using SIS. The extent of the reduction to be achieved determines the level of performance that the SIS must have to achieve this reduction assigned to it (required SIL). The real performance of SIS (real SIL) must meet the corresponding requirements. Otherwise, technical modifications must be made to the SIS. The application of the IEC 61508 approach addresses the risk analysis of butane product overflow stored in a tank and the verification of the ability of an SIS installed at this tank to control this risk. And if necessary, propose technical modifications to optimize the performance of the SIS. Risk analysis conducted using the HAZOP (HAZard and OPerability) method to identify critical accident scenarios, PHAST (Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool) software and risk matrix to estimate risk level of a given accident. Verification of the ability of an SIS installed at the tank to control the risk deemed unacceptable in the risk analysis phase is carried out by The LOPA (Layer Of Protection Analysis) method for the allocation of the required SIL for the SIS and SIL module of the GRIF (GRaphical Interface for reliability Forecasting) software to calculated real SIL of SIS. Depending on the results obtained (required SIL > real SIL), recommendations likely to strengthen the reliability of SIS are proposed (modification of the test policy and the architecture of the constituent elements of the SIS) in order to achieve the required SIL. And thus secure our system.","PeriodicalId":37802,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering","volume":"113 27","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Safety Instrumented System in a Natural Gas Facility According to IEC 61508 Standard\",\"authors\":\"Nabil Boudjoghra, Fares Innal\",\"doi\":\"10.18280/ijsse.130504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The work presented was aimed primarily at contributing to the control of risks relating to an industrial installation by means of a safety instrumented system (SIS), through a global approach defined by the IEC 61508 standard which goes from risk analysis to the evaluation of SIS. The IEC 61508 approach consists of industrial risk analysis which is a process used to identify the risks inherent in an industrial system and estimate the levels of these risks using several methods, tools and software. Then, the reduction of risks deemed unacceptable in the risk analysis phase to an acceptable level using SIS. The extent of the reduction to be achieved determines the level of performance that the SIS must have to achieve this reduction assigned to it (required SIL). The real performance of SIS (real SIL) must meet the corresponding requirements. Otherwise, technical modifications must be made to the SIS. The application of the IEC 61508 approach addresses the risk analysis of butane product overflow stored in a tank and the verification of the ability of an SIS installed at this tank to control this risk. And if necessary, propose technical modifications to optimize the performance of the SIS. Risk analysis conducted using the HAZOP (HAZard and OPerability) method to identify critical accident scenarios, PHAST (Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool) software and risk matrix to estimate risk level of a given accident. Verification of the ability of an SIS installed at the tank to control the risk deemed unacceptable in the risk analysis phase is carried out by The LOPA (Layer Of Protection Analysis) method for the allocation of the required SIL for the SIS and SIL module of the GRIF (GRaphical Interface for reliability Forecasting) software to calculated real SIL of SIS. Depending on the results obtained (required SIL > real SIL), recommendations likely to strengthen the reliability of SIS are proposed (modification of the test policy and the architecture of the constituent elements of the SIS) in order to achieve the required SIL. And thus secure our system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering\",\"volume\":\"113 27\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.130504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.130504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Safety Instrumented System in a Natural Gas Facility According to IEC 61508 Standard
The work presented was aimed primarily at contributing to the control of risks relating to an industrial installation by means of a safety instrumented system (SIS), through a global approach defined by the IEC 61508 standard which goes from risk analysis to the evaluation of SIS. The IEC 61508 approach consists of industrial risk analysis which is a process used to identify the risks inherent in an industrial system and estimate the levels of these risks using several methods, tools and software. Then, the reduction of risks deemed unacceptable in the risk analysis phase to an acceptable level using SIS. The extent of the reduction to be achieved determines the level of performance that the SIS must have to achieve this reduction assigned to it (required SIL). The real performance of SIS (real SIL) must meet the corresponding requirements. Otherwise, technical modifications must be made to the SIS. The application of the IEC 61508 approach addresses the risk analysis of butane product overflow stored in a tank and the verification of the ability of an SIS installed at this tank to control this risk. And if necessary, propose technical modifications to optimize the performance of the SIS. Risk analysis conducted using the HAZOP (HAZard and OPerability) method to identify critical accident scenarios, PHAST (Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool) software and risk matrix to estimate risk level of a given accident. Verification of the ability of an SIS installed at the tank to control the risk deemed unacceptable in the risk analysis phase is carried out by The LOPA (Layer Of Protection Analysis) method for the allocation of the required SIL for the SIS and SIL module of the GRIF (GRaphical Interface for reliability Forecasting) software to calculated real SIL of SIS. Depending on the results obtained (required SIL > real SIL), recommendations likely to strengthen the reliability of SIS are proposed (modification of the test policy and the architecture of the constituent elements of the SIS) in order to achieve the required SIL. And thus secure our system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering
International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering aims to provide a forum for the publication of papers on the most recent developments in the theoretical and practical aspects of these important fields. Safety and Security Engineering, due to its special nature, is an interdisciplinary area of research and applications that brings together in a systematic way many disciplines of engineering, from the traditional to the most technologically advanced. The Journal covers areas such as crisis management; security engineering; natural disasters and emergencies; terrorism; IT security; man-made hazards; risk management; control; protection and mitigation issues. The Journal aims to attract papers in all related fields, in addition to those listed under the List of Topics, as well as case studies describing practical experiences. The study of multifactor risk impact will be given special emphasis. Due to the multitude and variety of topics included, the List is only indicative of the themes of the expected papers. Authors are encouraged to submit papers in all areas of Safety and Security, with particular attention to integrated and interdisciplinary aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信