用5×2cv联合f检验比较分类回归树和逻辑回归算法对糖尿病数据集的影响

None Fashihullisan, None Dodi Vionanda, None Yenni Kurniawati, None Fadhilah Fitri
{"title":"用5×2cv联合f检验比较分类回归树和逻辑回归算法对糖尿病数据集的影响","authors":"None Fashihullisan, None Dodi Vionanda, None Yenni Kurniawati, None Fadhilah Fitri","doi":"10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification is the process of finding a model that describes and distinguishes data classes that aim to be used to predict the class of objects whose class labels are unknown. There are several algorithms in classification, such as classification trees and regression trees (CART) and logistic regression. The k-fold cross validation method has a weakness for algorithm comparison problems it is possible at different folds to produce different error predictions, so that the results of comparing algorithm performance will also be different. There for in the problem of comparison of algorithms, the researcher will apply the 52cv t test method and the 52cv combined F test. Out of 100 iterations the 10-fold cross validation method was only consistent three times which shows that the k-fold cross validation method has poor consistency in comparing the CART algorithm and logistic regression for diabetes mellitus data. In addition, 52cv combined F test and 52cv t test methods that have been carried out show that 52cv combined F test is better used to get conclusions from the results of a comparison of the two algorithms because it only produces one decision, in contrast to 52cv t test which has the possibility to get different decisions from 10 test statistics which results makes it difficult for researchers to draw conclusions in comparing the cart algorithm and logistic regression","PeriodicalId":220933,"journal":{"name":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Classification and Regression Tree and Logistic Regression Algorithms Using 5×2cv Combined F-Test on Diabetes Mellitus Dataset\",\"authors\":\"None Fashihullisan, None Dodi Vionanda, None Yenni Kurniawati, None Fadhilah Fitri\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classification is the process of finding a model that describes and distinguishes data classes that aim to be used to predict the class of objects whose class labels are unknown. There are several algorithms in classification, such as classification trees and regression trees (CART) and logistic regression. The k-fold cross validation method has a weakness for algorithm comparison problems it is possible at different folds to produce different error predictions, so that the results of comparing algorithm performance will also be different. There for in the problem of comparison of algorithms, the researcher will apply the 52cv t test method and the 52cv combined F test. Out of 100 iterations the 10-fold cross validation method was only consistent three times which shows that the k-fold cross validation method has poor consistency in comparing the CART algorithm and logistic regression for diabetes mellitus data. In addition, 52cv combined F test and 52cv t test methods that have been carried out show that 52cv combined F test is better used to get conclusions from the results of a comparison of the two algorithms because it only produces one decision, in contrast to 52cv t test which has the possibility to get different decisions from 10 test statistics which results makes it difficult for researchers to draw conclusions in comparing the cart algorithm and logistic regression\",\"PeriodicalId\":220933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分类是寻找描述和区分数据类的模型的过程,这些数据类旨在用于预测类标签未知的对象的类别。分类中有几种算法,如分类树和回归树(CART)和逻辑回归。k-fold交叉验证方法对于算法比较问题有一个弱点,它可能在不同的折叠处产生不同的误差预测,因此比较算法性能的结果也会有所不同。因此,在算法比较的问题上,研究者将采用52cv t检验方法和52cv组合F检验。在100次迭代中,10倍交叉验证方法的一致性只有3次,说明k倍交叉验证方法在对比CART算法与logistic回归对糖尿病数据的一致性较差。此外,52cv联合F检验和52cv t检验方法表明,52cv联合F检验可以更好地从两种算法的比较结果中得出结论,因为它只产生一个决策,而52cv t检验有可能从10个检验统计量中得出不同的决策,这使得研究人员在比较cart算法和logistic回归时难以得出结论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Classification and Regression Tree and Logistic Regression Algorithms Using 5×2cv Combined F-Test on Diabetes Mellitus Dataset
Classification is the process of finding a model that describes and distinguishes data classes that aim to be used to predict the class of objects whose class labels are unknown. There are several algorithms in classification, such as classification trees and regression trees (CART) and logistic regression. The k-fold cross validation method has a weakness for algorithm comparison problems it is possible at different folds to produce different error predictions, so that the results of comparing algorithm performance will also be different. There for in the problem of comparison of algorithms, the researcher will apply the 52cv t test method and the 52cv combined F test. Out of 100 iterations the 10-fold cross validation method was only consistent three times which shows that the k-fold cross validation method has poor consistency in comparing the CART algorithm and logistic regression for diabetes mellitus data. In addition, 52cv combined F test and 52cv t test methods that have been carried out show that 52cv combined F test is better used to get conclusions from the results of a comparison of the two algorithms because it only produces one decision, in contrast to 52cv t test which has the possibility to get different decisions from 10 test statistics which results makes it difficult for researchers to draw conclusions in comparing the cart algorithm and logistic regression
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信