结合5×2cv F检验的分类回归树与逻辑回归算法比较实证研究

None Fayza Annisa Febrianti, None Dodi Vionanda, None Yenni Kurniawati, None Fadhilah Fitri
{"title":"结合5×2cv F检验的分类回归树与逻辑回归算法比较实证研究","authors":"None Fayza Annisa Febrianti, None Dodi Vionanda, None Yenni Kurniawati, None Fadhilah Fitri","doi":"10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification is a method to estimate the class of an object based on its characteristics. Several learning algorithms can be applied in classification, such as Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and logistic regression. The main goal of classification is to find the best learning algorithm that can be applied to get the best classifier. In comparing two learning algorithms, a direct comparison by seeing the smaller prediction error rate may be possible when the difference is very clear. In this case, direct comparison is misleading and resulting inadequate conclusions. Therefore, a statistical test is needed to determine whether the difference is real or random. The results of the 5×2cv paired t-test sometimes reject and sometimes fail to reject the hypothesis. It is distracting because the changing of the error rate difference should not affect the test result. Meanwhile, the overall results of the combined 5×2cv F test show that the tests fail to reject the hypothesis. This indicates that CART and logistic regression perform identically in this case.","PeriodicalId":220933,"journal":{"name":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emprical Study for Algorithms Comparison of Classification and Regression Tree and Logistic Regression Using Combined 5×2cv F Test\",\"authors\":\"None Fayza Annisa Febrianti, None Dodi Vionanda, None Yenni Kurniawati, None Fadhilah Fitri\",\"doi\":\"10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classification is a method to estimate the class of an object based on its characteristics. Several learning algorithms can be applied in classification, such as Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and logistic regression. The main goal of classification is to find the best learning algorithm that can be applied to get the best classifier. In comparing two learning algorithms, a direct comparison by seeing the smaller prediction error rate may be possible when the difference is very clear. In this case, direct comparison is misleading and resulting inadequate conclusions. Therefore, a statistical test is needed to determine whether the difference is real or random. The results of the 5×2cv paired t-test sometimes reject and sometimes fail to reject the hypothesis. It is distracting because the changing of the error rate difference should not affect the test result. Meanwhile, the overall results of the combined 5×2cv F test show that the tests fail to reject the hypothesis. This indicates that CART and logistic regression perform identically in this case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":220933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/85\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNP Journal of Statistics and Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/ujsds/vol1-iss4/85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分类是一种根据对象的特征来估计其类别的方法。分类中可以应用几种学习算法,如分类与回归树(CART)和逻辑回归。分类的主要目标是找到最佳的学习算法,从而得到最佳的分类器。在比较两种学习算法时,当差异非常明显时,可以通过观察较小的预测错误率进行直接比较。在这种情况下,直接比较会产生误导,并得出不充分的结论。因此,需要统计检验来确定差异是真实的还是随机的。5×2cv配对t检验的结果有时拒绝,有时不能拒绝假设。因为错误率差的变化不应该影响测试结果,所以会让人分心。同时,综合5×2cv F检验的总体结果表明,检验不能拒绝假设。这表明CART和逻辑回归在这种情况下执行相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emprical Study for Algorithms Comparison of Classification and Regression Tree and Logistic Regression Using Combined 5×2cv F Test
Classification is a method to estimate the class of an object based on its characteristics. Several learning algorithms can be applied in classification, such as Classification and Regression Tree (CART) and logistic regression. The main goal of classification is to find the best learning algorithm that can be applied to get the best classifier. In comparing two learning algorithms, a direct comparison by seeing the smaller prediction error rate may be possible when the difference is very clear. In this case, direct comparison is misleading and resulting inadequate conclusions. Therefore, a statistical test is needed to determine whether the difference is real or random. The results of the 5×2cv paired t-test sometimes reject and sometimes fail to reject the hypothesis. It is distracting because the changing of the error rate difference should not affect the test result. Meanwhile, the overall results of the combined 5×2cv F test show that the tests fail to reject the hypothesis. This indicates that CART and logistic regression perform identically in this case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信