COVID-19与抗菌素耐药性的关系

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tuba MÜDERRİS, Selcuk KAYA, Fulya BAYINDIR BİLMAN, Erkan OZMEN, Bilal Olcay PEKER, Ayşegül AKSOY GÖKMEN, Süreyya GÜL YURTSEVER
{"title":"COVID-19与抗菌素耐药性的关系","authors":"Tuba MÜDERRİS, Selcuk KAYA, Fulya BAYINDIR BİLMAN, Erkan OZMEN, Bilal Olcay PEKER, Ayşegül AKSOY GÖKMEN, Süreyya GÜL YURTSEVER","doi":"10.5472/marumj.1367895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Bacterial and fungal infections, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) results of bacterial agents, and the effect of the pandemic
 on AMR were evaluated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In addition, the detected AMR rates were compared with the AMR rates
 of the pre-pandemic period.
 Patients and Methods: The isolates grown in respiratory and blood samples of adult patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of
 COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The same data in hospitalized patients before the
 pandemic, between March and December 2019, were evaluated retrospectively.
 Results: A total of 724 samples were included in the study. The superinfection rate was found to be 15.3%. The most frequently isolated
 microorganisms are; Acinetobacter baumannii (34.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (10.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.7%) and Pseudomonas
 aeruginosa (7.3%). The lowest resistance rates in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were found for aminoglycosides, in Acinetobacter
 baumannii isolates were found for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were found for amikacin.
 When pre-pandemic and pandemic AMR rates were compared; a significant increase in amikacin resistance was detected only in
 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates during the pandemic period (P:0.049).
 Conclusion: The data we have presented may help clinicians in the selection of antimicrobials for empirical therapy by revealing the
 effect of the pandemic on AMR.","PeriodicalId":43341,"journal":{"name":"Marmara Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance\",\"authors\":\"Tuba MÜDERRİS, Selcuk KAYA, Fulya BAYINDIR BİLMAN, Erkan OZMEN, Bilal Olcay PEKER, Ayşegül AKSOY GÖKMEN, Süreyya GÜL YURTSEVER\",\"doi\":\"10.5472/marumj.1367895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Bacterial and fungal infections, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) results of bacterial agents, and the effect of the pandemic
 on AMR were evaluated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In addition, the detected AMR rates were compared with the AMR rates
 of the pre-pandemic period.
 Patients and Methods: The isolates grown in respiratory and blood samples of adult patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of
 COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The same data in hospitalized patients before the
 pandemic, between March and December 2019, were evaluated retrospectively.
 Results: A total of 724 samples were included in the study. The superinfection rate was found to be 15.3%. The most frequently isolated
 microorganisms are; Acinetobacter baumannii (34.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (10.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.7%) and Pseudomonas
 aeruginosa (7.3%). The lowest resistance rates in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were found for aminoglycosides, in Acinetobacter
 baumannii isolates were found for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were found for amikacin.
 When pre-pandemic and pandemic AMR rates were compared; a significant increase in amikacin resistance was detected only in
 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates during the pandemic period (P:0.049).
 Conclusion: The data we have presented may help clinicians in the selection of antimicrobials for empirical therapy by revealing the
 effect of the pandemic on AMR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marmara Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marmara Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1367895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marmara Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.1367895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨细菌和真菌感染、抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)结果及对疫情的影响;评估住院COVID-19患者的AMR。此外,将检测到的AMR率与AMR率 大流行前时期的情况。 患者和方法:分离株生长在诊断为 的住院成人患者的呼吸和血液样本中;回顾性评估2020年3月至2020年12月期间的COVID-19。入院患者的数据相同 回顾性评估了2019年3月至12月期间的大流行。结果:共纳入724份样本。重复感染率为15.3%。最常被隔离的 微生物;鲍曼不动杆菌(34.4%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(10.8%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(9.7%)和假单胞菌;绿脓杆菌(7.3%)。肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中耐药率最低的是氨基糖苷类,不动杆菌(acinetobacterium 鲍曼尼菌分离物为甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑,铜绿假单胞菌分离物为阿米卡星。 当比较大流行前和大流行时的抗菌素耐药性率;仅在 中检测到阿米卡星耐药性显著增加;大流行期间肺炎克雷伯菌分离株(P:0.049)。 结论:我们提出的数据可能有助于临床医生在选择抗菌素经验治疗通过揭示 大流行对抗生素耐药性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship between COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance
Objective: Bacterial and fungal infections, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) results of bacterial agents, and the effect of the pandemic on AMR were evaluated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. In addition, the detected AMR rates were compared with the AMR rates of the pre-pandemic period. Patients and Methods: The isolates grown in respiratory and blood samples of adult patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 2020 and December 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. The same data in hospitalized patients before the pandemic, between March and December 2019, were evaluated retrospectively. Results: A total of 724 samples were included in the study. The superinfection rate was found to be 15.3%. The most frequently isolated microorganisms are; Acinetobacter baumannii (34.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (10.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.3%). The lowest resistance rates in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were found for aminoglycosides, in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were found for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were found for amikacin. When pre-pandemic and pandemic AMR rates were compared; a significant increase in amikacin resistance was detected only in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates during the pandemic period (P:0.049). Conclusion: The data we have presented may help clinicians in the selection of antimicrobials for empirical therapy by revealing the effect of the pandemic on AMR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marmara Medical Journal
Marmara Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Marmara Medical Journal, Marmara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi tarafından yılda üç kere yayımlanan multidisipliner bir dergidir. Bu dergide tıbbın tüm alanlarına ait orijinal araştırma makaleleri, olgu sunumları ve derlemeler İngilizce veya Türkçe olarak yer alır.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信