PABLO DIANGIENDA, Dieudonné Molamba Moningo, Alain Ngoma, Mathieu Nkumu Loposso, Michel Daudon
{"title":"资源有限环境下尿石症的管理:刚果民主共和国的一项多中心回顾性研究","authors":"PABLO DIANGIENDA, Dieudonné Molamba Moningo, Alain Ngoma, Mathieu Nkumu Loposso, Michel Daudon","doi":"10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i03/1630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Despite the increasing use of minimally invasive surgery techniques in the management of urolithiasis worldwide, resource-limited countries are still experiencing various challenges. This study aims to analyze different therapeutic modalities used in the treatment of urolithiasis in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, records of 194 patients who presented with documented urolithiasis in 13 hospitals across 4 provinces from January 2010 through September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The different layers of stones were analyzed by infrared spectrophotometry. Results: Urolithiasis was symptomatic in 52.6% (n=194) of patients. Overall, 86.1% (i.e. 167 out of 194) of stones were removed by surgery, 9.8% spontaneously resolved; 3.1% were extracted after ureteroscopy and 1% of patients had undergone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Lumbotomy was the most used route (45.2% of cases) in conventional surgery. Conclusion: Most patients in this study were treated by conventional surgery. These results suggest the need to increase the use of minimally invasive surgery.","PeriodicalId":94374,"journal":{"name":"International journal of innovative research in medical science","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urolithiasis Management in Resource-Limited Settings: A Multicentric Retrospective Study in the Democratic Republic of Congo\",\"authors\":\"PABLO DIANGIENDA, Dieudonné Molamba Moningo, Alain Ngoma, Mathieu Nkumu Loposso, Michel Daudon\",\"doi\":\"10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i03/1630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Despite the increasing use of minimally invasive surgery techniques in the management of urolithiasis worldwide, resource-limited countries are still experiencing various challenges. This study aims to analyze different therapeutic modalities used in the treatment of urolithiasis in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, records of 194 patients who presented with documented urolithiasis in 13 hospitals across 4 provinces from January 2010 through September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The different layers of stones were analyzed by infrared spectrophotometry. Results: Urolithiasis was symptomatic in 52.6% (n=194) of patients. Overall, 86.1% (i.e. 167 out of 194) of stones were removed by surgery, 9.8% spontaneously resolved; 3.1% were extracted after ureteroscopy and 1% of patients had undergone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Lumbotomy was the most used route (45.2% of cases) in conventional surgery. Conclusion: Most patients in this study were treated by conventional surgery. These results suggest the need to increase the use of minimally invasive surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of innovative research in medical science\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of innovative research in medical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i03/1630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of innovative research in medical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol08-i03/1630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Urolithiasis Management in Resource-Limited Settings: A Multicentric Retrospective Study in the Democratic Republic of Congo
Introduction: Despite the increasing use of minimally invasive surgery techniques in the management of urolithiasis worldwide, resource-limited countries are still experiencing various challenges. This study aims to analyze different therapeutic modalities used in the treatment of urolithiasis in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, records of 194 patients who presented with documented urolithiasis in 13 hospitals across 4 provinces from January 2010 through September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The different layers of stones were analyzed by infrared spectrophotometry. Results: Urolithiasis was symptomatic in 52.6% (n=194) of patients. Overall, 86.1% (i.e. 167 out of 194) of stones were removed by surgery, 9.8% spontaneously resolved; 3.1% were extracted after ureteroscopy and 1% of patients had undergone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Lumbotomy was the most used route (45.2% of cases) in conventional surgery. Conclusion: Most patients in this study were treated by conventional surgery. These results suggest the need to increase the use of minimally invasive surgery.