Roberto Avilés, Diego Brito de Souza, José Pino-Ortega, Julen Castellano
{"title":"基于惯性传感器惯性数据集成的方向角变化检测新算法的一致性、准确性和可靠性","authors":"Roberto Avilés, Diego Brito de Souza, José Pino-Ortega, Julen Castellano","doi":"10.3390/a16110496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of algorithms applied to new technologies allows a better understanding of many of the movements in team sports. The purpose of this work was to analyze the validity, precision, and reproducibility of an algorithm to detect angulation of changes of direction (CoDs) while running, of between 45° and 180°, both to the left and the right at different speeds, in a standardized context. For this, five participants performed a total of 200 CoDs at 13 km/h and 128 CoDs at 18 km/h while wearing three inertial sensors. The information obtained from the sensors was contrasted with observation and coding using high-resolution video. Agreement between systems was assessed using Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement as well as effect size (ES) and % difference between means. Reproducibility was evaluated using the standard error (CV%). The algorithm overestimated the angulation of 90° and 135° to the right (Cohen’s d > 0.91). The algorithm showed high precision when the angulations recorded at 13 km/h and 18 km/h were compared, except at 45° to the left (mean bias = −2.6°; Cohen’s d = −0.57). All angulations showed excellent reproducibility (CV < 5%) except at 45° (CV = 11%), which worsened when the pre-CoD speed was 18 km/h (CV < 16%). The algorithm showed a high degree of validity and reproducibility to detect angles during CoDs.","PeriodicalId":7636,"journal":{"name":"Algorithms","volume":"21 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement, Accuracy, and Reliability of a New Algorithm for the Detection of Change of Direction Angle Based on Integrating Inertial Data from Inertial Sensors\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Avilés, Diego Brito de Souza, José Pino-Ortega, Julen Castellano\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/a16110496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of algorithms applied to new technologies allows a better understanding of many of the movements in team sports. The purpose of this work was to analyze the validity, precision, and reproducibility of an algorithm to detect angulation of changes of direction (CoDs) while running, of between 45° and 180°, both to the left and the right at different speeds, in a standardized context. For this, five participants performed a total of 200 CoDs at 13 km/h and 128 CoDs at 18 km/h while wearing three inertial sensors. The information obtained from the sensors was contrasted with observation and coding using high-resolution video. Agreement between systems was assessed using Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement as well as effect size (ES) and % difference between means. Reproducibility was evaluated using the standard error (CV%). The algorithm overestimated the angulation of 90° and 135° to the right (Cohen’s d > 0.91). The algorithm showed high precision when the angulations recorded at 13 km/h and 18 km/h were compared, except at 45° to the left (mean bias = −2.6°; Cohen’s d = −0.57). All angulations showed excellent reproducibility (CV < 5%) except at 45° (CV = 11%), which worsened when the pre-CoD speed was 18 km/h (CV < 16%). The algorithm showed a high degree of validity and reproducibility to detect angles during CoDs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algorithms\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algorithms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/a16110496\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/a16110496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
应用于新技术的算法的发展可以更好地理解团队运动中的许多动作。这项工作的目的是分析一种算法的有效性、精度和可重复性,该算法可以检测在45°到180°之间的方向变化(CoDs),在不同的速度下,在标准化的环境中向左和向右。为此,五名参与者在佩戴三个惯性传感器的情况下,以13公里/小时的速度进行了200次CoDs,以18公里/小时的速度进行了128次CoDs。从传感器获得的信息与高分辨率视频的观察和编码进行对比。采用Bland-Altman 95%一致性限以及效应大小(ES)和均数差异%评估系统间的一致性。用标准误差(CV%)评价重现性。该算法高估了向右90°和135°的角度(Cohen 's d >0.91)。将13 km/h和18 km/h记录的角度进行比较,该算法显示出较高的精度,但向左45°处除外(平均偏差=−2.6°;Cohen’s d = - 0.57)。所有角度均表现出良好的再现性(CV <(CV = 11%),当预cod速度为18 km/h时(CV <16%)。该算法具有较高的有效性和可重复性,可用于cod过程中的角度检测。
Agreement, Accuracy, and Reliability of a New Algorithm for the Detection of Change of Direction Angle Based on Integrating Inertial Data from Inertial Sensors
The development of algorithms applied to new technologies allows a better understanding of many of the movements in team sports. The purpose of this work was to analyze the validity, precision, and reproducibility of an algorithm to detect angulation of changes of direction (CoDs) while running, of between 45° and 180°, both to the left and the right at different speeds, in a standardized context. For this, five participants performed a total of 200 CoDs at 13 km/h and 128 CoDs at 18 km/h while wearing three inertial sensors. The information obtained from the sensors was contrasted with observation and coding using high-resolution video. Agreement between systems was assessed using Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement as well as effect size (ES) and % difference between means. Reproducibility was evaluated using the standard error (CV%). The algorithm overestimated the angulation of 90° and 135° to the right (Cohen’s d > 0.91). The algorithm showed high precision when the angulations recorded at 13 km/h and 18 km/h were compared, except at 45° to the left (mean bias = −2.6°; Cohen’s d = −0.57). All angulations showed excellent reproducibility (CV < 5%) except at 45° (CV = 11%), which worsened when the pre-CoD speed was 18 km/h (CV < 16%). The algorithm showed a high degree of validity and reproducibility to detect angles during CoDs.