基于10Be的全球景观演化模型优化

IF 2.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Gregory A. Ruetenik, John D. Jansen, Pedro Val, Lotta Ylä-Mella
{"title":"基于10Be的全球景观演化模型优化","authors":"Gregory A. Ruetenik, John D. Jansen, Pedro Val, Lotta Ylä-Mella","doi":"10.5194/esurf-11-865-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. By simulating erosion and deposition, landscape evolution models (LEMs) offer powerful insights into Earth surface processes and dynamics. Stream-power-based LEMs are often constructed from parameters describing drainage area (m), slope (n), substrate erodibility (K), hillslope diffusion (D), and a critical drainage area (Ac) that signifies the downslope transition from hillslope diffusion to advective fluvial processes. In spite of the widespread success of such models, the parameter values are highly uncertain mainly because the advection and diffusion equations amalgamate physical processes and material properties that span widely differing spatial and temporal scales. Here, we use a global catalogue of catchment-averaged cosmogenic 10Be-derived denudation rates with the aim to optimise a set of LEMs via a Monte Carlo-based parameter search. We consider three model scenarios: advection-only, diffusion-only, and an advection–diffusion hybrid. In each case, we search for a parameter set that best approximates denudation rates at the global scale, and we directly compare denudation rates from the modelled scenarios with those derived from 10Be data. We find that optimised ranges can be defined for many LEM parameters at the global scale. In the absence of diffusion, n∼1.3, and with increasing diffusivity the optimal n increases linearly to a global maximum of n∼2.3. Meanwhile, we find that the diffusion-only model yields a slightly lower misfit when comparing model outputs with observed erosion rates than the advection-only model and is optimised when the concavity parameter is raised to a power of 2. With these examples, we suggest that our approach provides baseline parameter estimates for large-scale studies spanning long timescales and diverse landscape properties. Moreover, our direct comparison of model-predicted versus observed denudation rates is preferable to methods that rely upon catchment-scale averaging or amalgamation of topographic metrics. We also seek to optimise the K and D parameters in LEMs with respect to precipitation and substrate lithology. Despite the potential bias due to factors such as lithology, these optimised models allow us to effectively control for topography and specifically target the relationship between denudation and precipitation. All models suggest a general increase in exponents with precipitation in line with previous studies. When isolating K under globally optimised models, we observe a positive correlation between K or D and precipitation &gt; 1500 mm yr−1, plus a local maximum at ∼300 mm yr−1, which is compatible with the long-standing hypothesis that semi-arid environments are among the most erodible.","PeriodicalId":48749,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Dynamics","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising global landscape evolution models with <sup>10</sup>Be\",\"authors\":\"Gregory A. Ruetenik, John D. Jansen, Pedro Val, Lotta Ylä-Mella\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/esurf-11-865-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. By simulating erosion and deposition, landscape evolution models (LEMs) offer powerful insights into Earth surface processes and dynamics. Stream-power-based LEMs are often constructed from parameters describing drainage area (m), slope (n), substrate erodibility (K), hillslope diffusion (D), and a critical drainage area (Ac) that signifies the downslope transition from hillslope diffusion to advective fluvial processes. In spite of the widespread success of such models, the parameter values are highly uncertain mainly because the advection and diffusion equations amalgamate physical processes and material properties that span widely differing spatial and temporal scales. Here, we use a global catalogue of catchment-averaged cosmogenic 10Be-derived denudation rates with the aim to optimise a set of LEMs via a Monte Carlo-based parameter search. We consider three model scenarios: advection-only, diffusion-only, and an advection–diffusion hybrid. In each case, we search for a parameter set that best approximates denudation rates at the global scale, and we directly compare denudation rates from the modelled scenarios with those derived from 10Be data. We find that optimised ranges can be defined for many LEM parameters at the global scale. In the absence of diffusion, n∼1.3, and with increasing diffusivity the optimal n increases linearly to a global maximum of n∼2.3. Meanwhile, we find that the diffusion-only model yields a slightly lower misfit when comparing model outputs with observed erosion rates than the advection-only model and is optimised when the concavity parameter is raised to a power of 2. With these examples, we suggest that our approach provides baseline parameter estimates for large-scale studies spanning long timescales and diverse landscape properties. Moreover, our direct comparison of model-predicted versus observed denudation rates is preferable to methods that rely upon catchment-scale averaging or amalgamation of topographic metrics. We also seek to optimise the K and D parameters in LEMs with respect to precipitation and substrate lithology. Despite the potential bias due to factors such as lithology, these optimised models allow us to effectively control for topography and specifically target the relationship between denudation and precipitation. All models suggest a general increase in exponents with precipitation in line with previous studies. When isolating K under globally optimised models, we observe a positive correlation between K or D and precipitation &gt; 1500 mm yr−1, plus a local maximum at ∼300 mm yr−1, which is compatible with the long-standing hypothesis that semi-arid environments are among the most erodible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Surface Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Surface Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-865-2023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-865-2023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要通过模拟侵蚀和沉积,景观演化模型(LEMs)提供了对地球表面过程和动力学的有力见解。基于水流动力的LEMs通常由以下参数构建:流域面积(m)、坡度(n)、基材可蚀性(K)、山坡扩散(D)和临界流域面积(Ac),该区域表示从山坡扩散到平流河流过程的下坡过渡。尽管这些模型取得了广泛的成功,但参数值具有高度的不确定性,主要是因为平流和扩散方程合并了跨越广泛不同空间和时间尺度的物理过程和材料特性。在这里,我们使用全球流域平均宇宙起源10be的剥蚀率目录,目的是通过基于蒙特卡洛的参数搜索来优化一组lem。我们考虑了三种模型情景:仅平流、仅扩散和平流-扩散混合。在每一种情况下,我们寻找一个最接近全球尺度剥蚀率的参数集,并直接将模拟情景的剥蚀率与来自10Be数据的剥蚀率进行比较。我们发现可以在全局尺度上定义许多LEM参数的优化范围。在没有扩散的情况下,n ~ 1.3,随着扩散率的增加,最优n线性增加,达到全局最大值n ~ 2.3。与此同时,我们发现,当将模型输出与观测到的侵蚀率进行比较时,仅扩散模型的失配程度略低于仅平流模型,并且当凹凸度参数提高到2次幂时,该模型得到了优化。通过这些例子,我们认为我们的方法为跨越长时间尺度和不同景观特性的大规模研究提供了基线参数估计。此外,我们对模型预测和观测到的剥蚀率的直接比较比依赖于流域尺度平均或地形指标合并的方法更可取。我们还寻求优化lem中关于沉淀和衬底岩性的K和D参数。尽管由于岩性等因素可能存在偏差,但这些优化模型使我们能够有效地控制地形,并专门针对剥蚀与降水之间的关系。所有模式都表明,与以前的研究一致,指数随降水普遍增加。当在全局优化模式下分离K时,我们观察到K或D与降水>之间呈正相关;1500 mm yr - 1,加上约300 mm yr - 1的局部最大值,这与长期以来的假设相符,即半干旱环境是最易侵蚀的环境之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimising global landscape evolution models with 10Be
Abstract. By simulating erosion and deposition, landscape evolution models (LEMs) offer powerful insights into Earth surface processes and dynamics. Stream-power-based LEMs are often constructed from parameters describing drainage area (m), slope (n), substrate erodibility (K), hillslope diffusion (D), and a critical drainage area (Ac) that signifies the downslope transition from hillslope diffusion to advective fluvial processes. In spite of the widespread success of such models, the parameter values are highly uncertain mainly because the advection and diffusion equations amalgamate physical processes and material properties that span widely differing spatial and temporal scales. Here, we use a global catalogue of catchment-averaged cosmogenic 10Be-derived denudation rates with the aim to optimise a set of LEMs via a Monte Carlo-based parameter search. We consider three model scenarios: advection-only, diffusion-only, and an advection–diffusion hybrid. In each case, we search for a parameter set that best approximates denudation rates at the global scale, and we directly compare denudation rates from the modelled scenarios with those derived from 10Be data. We find that optimised ranges can be defined for many LEM parameters at the global scale. In the absence of diffusion, n∼1.3, and with increasing diffusivity the optimal n increases linearly to a global maximum of n∼2.3. Meanwhile, we find that the diffusion-only model yields a slightly lower misfit when comparing model outputs with observed erosion rates than the advection-only model and is optimised when the concavity parameter is raised to a power of 2. With these examples, we suggest that our approach provides baseline parameter estimates for large-scale studies spanning long timescales and diverse landscape properties. Moreover, our direct comparison of model-predicted versus observed denudation rates is preferable to methods that rely upon catchment-scale averaging or amalgamation of topographic metrics. We also seek to optimise the K and D parameters in LEMs with respect to precipitation and substrate lithology. Despite the potential bias due to factors such as lithology, these optimised models allow us to effectively control for topography and specifically target the relationship between denudation and precipitation. All models suggest a general increase in exponents with precipitation in line with previous studies. When isolating K under globally optimised models, we observe a positive correlation between K or D and precipitation > 1500 mm yr−1, plus a local maximum at ∼300 mm yr−1, which is compatible with the long-standing hypothesis that semi-arid environments are among the most erodible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Surface Dynamics
Earth Surface Dynamics GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICALGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
56
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research on the physical, chemical, and biological processes shaping Earth''s surface and their interactions on all scales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信